Stop the Trucks!

Public Document Storage Facility

StopTheTrucks BLOG

 


 From the Ojai Valley News:

Stop the Trucks hosting Libbey Bowl show Oct. 3
By Sondra Murphy

     Local activists trying to limit mine transportation through the Ojai Valley have decided to fight gravel with rock. And roll.

     In anticipation of its next round of legal battles, the Stop the Trucks Coalition is throwing a benefit concert in Libbey Park the first weekend in October.
Many have noticed that Stop the Trucks has been a bit quiet since the Ozena Rock and Gravel Mine scoping meeting back in May that packed Chaparral Auditorium. “It’s the calm before the storm,” said Michael Shapiro, coalition chairman.

     “We had a scoping meeting several months ago and that was our opportunity to express to the county specific concerns we had about (California Environmental Quality Act) law, and others as well,” said Shapiro. “The Environmental Impact Report, we understand, is about to be reviewed by an independent environmental consultant chosen by the county .… then it will be submitted before the Ventura Planning Commission and they will probably approve it and then it will go before the Board of Supervisors.”

     Shapiro estimated that at the beginning of 2010, Ojai will have the chance to go over the report and attorneys and air and traffic consultants, “to point out areas we are convinced can never be mitigated,” he said, adding this will generate legal expenses. ‘Rock the Trucks’ is one way to buffer our war chest,” Shapiro said.
He added that the coalition is not against the trucking industry, but strives to limit the number of gravel trucks running through the Ojai Valley.

     “People ask, ‘Where do you get 800 trucks a day?’ There are four mines up there right now and a potential fifth. They know they could have approached Ojai as an industry, but they decided to hit us one at a time so we would have to spend legal fees one mine at a time. Diamond Rock Mine asked for 200 trips a day. Ozena is asking for 200 a day. If all these mines get approved one mine at a time, then 800 is actually accurate.”

     Shapiro feels confident his experience combating the Weldon Canyon dump plans left him qualified to counter the processes associated with such industrial efforts. “To have these gravel trucks plowing through Ojai 24-7 will transform it from the bucolic town whose economy flourishes on arts, education and tourism and turn Ojai into a de facto industrial trucking zone more resembling Mojave, Palmdale or San Bernardino,” said Shapiro. “Years ago, our city founders agreed to never allow industry in. This is the latest monumental fight for Ojai as we know it and the ‘Rock the Trucks’ benefit concert is just our way to try and fund that fight.”

     The ‘Rock the Trucks’ concert is co-sponsored by the Ojai Valley Green Coalition and scheduled for Oct. 3 from 2 to 10 p.m. at Libbey Bowl.

     The talent includes many local artists, plus special guest star Keith Carradine. Scheduled to perform are Jonathan McEuen with Jesse Sibenberg and Teddi Jack, Julie Christensen, Marty Grebb with Bob Glaub, B.B. Chung King and Gary Mallaber, The Jane Does, Lights — a Journey tribute band — and more surprise special guests are promised.


Lawn seating costs $25; premier seating costs $35; and VIP seating in the first three rows costs $50.
For more information or to order tickets, call 646-7980 or visit rockthetrucks.com.



Rock the Trucks

LATEST NEWS
Exciting Concert Line-Up Set
Buy Tickets Online Now!
INFORMATION
WHAT'S AT STAKE?

THE GRAVEL TRUCK THREAT
Over 500 MORE gravel trucks per day may soon be a permanent fixture in our beautiful Ojai Valley unless something is done immediately!


The opening / expansion of several major mining operations in the Cuyama & Lockwood Valleys will require transportation, via large piggy-back trucks, of hundreds of loads each day. Route 33 is the "preferred" road for these operations as it is relatively unmonitored and may be a slightly shorter alternative.
While the Stop the Trucks! Coalition recognizes the importance of mining available gravel, it opposes the increased truck traffic through the Ojai Valley that will result from the opening of new mining operations.

WHAT IS THE THREAT?


Our health and safety
- the trucks pass four schools and our local hospital.


Our air quality

- diesel fumes are highly toxic and a known carcinogenic especially to children and the elderly.


Our economy

- based largely on tourism, agriculture, and education.


Driver's safety
- non-truckers and truckers, alike - Rt. 33 is a winding and aging highway, never built to withstand these trucks and their loads
(in fact, the tunnels are not wide enough for two of these trucks to pass at the same time).


IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE?
Yes, Highway 166 is an established route for heavy trucking.

No one involved in this benefit is against independent truckers. In fact, we are concerned for driver safety. The mines can use safer and more environmentally sound alternatives, and that's what we're arguing for.

Join Our Mailing List

           
Please join us for an exciting event

Saturday, October 3
Libbey Bowl, Ojai, CA.

DO YOU LOVE OJAI LIKE WE LOVE OJAI?
If so, get involved by joining us October 3rd for the
Rock the Trucks! benefit concert at Libbey Bowl!
Come and join some of your favorite stars
at this fun-filled, all-day event featuring a fabulous
line-up of performers and speakers, dancing under
the trees, food and friends. Bring a picnic, bring
your friends and family, and join us,
Saturday, October 3rd  from 2 p.m. to 10 p.m.

DON'T MISS THE LAST BIG SUMMER BASH

AND JOIN THE FIGHT TO SAVE OUR COMMUNITY!

Feel free to forward this message to all your friends.

...PLUS OTHER VERY SPECIAL GUESTS!

     What will happen in the Ojai Valley if the rock and gravel mines, their lobbyists and supporters at Cal Trans, and the planning departments of Santa Barbara and Ventura
counties have their way?

     Each day, 800 double-hopper, 80,000-pound diesel-exhaust polluting, speeding, behemoth trucks could be traveling up and down Highway 33 to and from five different mines located in the Los Padres National Forest.

     After careening back and forth on one of California's designated scenic highways, those trucks will run through the Ojai Valley's most sensitive locations. Ojai will then be
transformed into a heavily industrialized trucking zone - polluting, endangering and destroying a bucolic town that embodies the small-town experience of a California
that has all but vanished elsewhere in the state.

     With your support, The Stop The Trucks! Coalition - in association with the Ojai Valley Green Coalition, the Los Padres Forest Watch, the City of Ojai, the Ojai Chamber of Commerce and the Ojai Unified School District - may be able to prevent the destruction
of a unique town known for the arts, education, tourism, and extraordinary natural beauty.

     In order to avoid widespread industrialization, danger and pollution, we are asking you to join us in enjoying our fundraising benefit concert Rock the Trucks!  to help defray the coalition's legal fees.

Please stand by Ojai during this critical time.

Send your donations of $100 or more to:
Ojai Valley Green Coalition
323 E. Matilija St. Ste. 110-114
Ojai, CA. 93023

Send your donations of under $100 to:
The Ojai Chamber of Commerce
P.O. Box 1134
Ojai, CA, 93024

Be sure to reference the Stop The Trucks! Coalition on the memo line of your check.
Donations of $100.00 or more may be tax-deductible
(ask your tax advisor).
Or you may also walk your contribution into the Chamber's offices anytime during the business week, at 201 S. Signal Street - in the Ojai Festivals building - in downtown Ojai.

Sincerely,

Maureen Clark
MoVents Entertainment on behalf of Stop The Trucks! Coalition

 

Stop the Trucks: Benefit Rock Concert

DO YOU LOVE OJAI  like  WE LOVE OJAI?

If so, get involved by joining us October 3rd for the Rock the Trucks! benefit concert at Libbey Bowl!

Come and join some of your favorite Hollywood stars at this fun-filled, all-day event featuring a fabulous line-up of performers and speakers, dancing under the trees, food and friends. 

Bring a picnic, bring your friends and family, and join us, Saturday, Oct. 3rd, from 2 p.m. to 10 p.m.

DON’T MISS THE LAST BIG SUMMER BASH AND JOIN THE FIGHT TO SAVE OUR COMMUNITY!

Lineup:
  • The JANE DOES
  • MARTY GREBB with BOB GLAUB , B.B. CHUNG KING ,
    and GARY MALLABER
  • LIGHTS – THE PREMIERE TRIBUTE BAND TO JOURNEY
  • JONATHAN McEUEN , TEDDY JACK, and JESSE SIEBENBERG
  • JULIE CHRISTENSEN
  • ...and special guest star KEITH CARRADINE

…PLUS OTHER VERY SPECIAL GUESTS

     Once again, the people of Ojai have come together to defend this unique town known for the arts, education, tourism, and extraordinary natural beauty. On October 3rd, a fantastic line-up of musicians and speakers will perform a benefit concert at Libbey Bowl to join the fight to Stop the Trucks!

     About 800 double-hopper, 80,000-pound, diesel-exhaust polluting, speeding, huge trucks could be traveling – 24 hours a day, six days a week – up and down Highway 33 through the Ojai Valley and the Los Padres National Forest to and from four different mines located in and around the Cuyama Valley. To avoid widespread industrialization, danger and pollution, the coalition is asking the public to participate in “Rock the Trucks!” to help defray mounting legal fees.

Food, beverage, and information booths will fill the park.

The Rock the Trucks! concert will take place on Saturday, October 3, 2-10 p.m., at Libbey Bowl, in the center of town. 

Cost: $25-$50 per person.   

CLICK HERE  For further information or to purchase tickets.

Contact:
Ellen Sklarz
Press Relations

(805) 889-7104


 

From the OVN

Sand Truck Overturns On Maricopa

sandspill2 A truck carrying a load of sand overturned Saturday morning on Highway 33 at mile marker 23. The driver of the truck was uninjured, and one lane of the two-lane highway was blocked until the truck was uprighted about two hours later. The ownership of the truck, its destination, or cause of the accident were not known at the time of this report. The CHP is investigating the incident.

Photo by Maureen Clark

 

 


Scoping Meeting Follow-Up

Kim Rodriguez, Director
Ventura County Resource Management Agency, Planning Division
800 South Victoria Ave., L#1740
Ventura, CA 93009
(Fax: 805-654-2509)

cc: Matt Carroll; Dan Klemann; Ojai Stop The Trucks Coalition

Dear Kim Rodriguez:

     We would like to again reiterate our thanks and appreciation for holding both a Scoping Meeting in Ojai and for also meeting with the Executive Committee for the Stop the Trucks Coalition several weeks earlier.

     It is our earnest hope that the expressions of concern made by the citizens of the Ojai Valley in regards the prospects of a permit renewal for the Ozena Valley Ranch gravel mine were both appropriate in regards the legal issues and the manner and tone with which they were communicated to the Planning Division.

     As part of our follow up to that meeting there are a number of questions, issues and additional concerns that we would like to bring to your attention and hopefully gain your office's response.

     1) Can you,  

          A) confirm that the conversation between Dan Klemann and one of our executive committee members, reflects the most current and accurate information regarding the timetable going forward? And 

          B) will you formally notify "Stop The Trucks" precisely when the work plan noted below is received from the consultants and presented to the Board of Supervisors?

     "Dan Klemann at the Planning Division estimated that we won't see the draft EIR until February 2010 at the earliest. They have forwarded all the comments to the consultant, then the consultant puts together a work plan based on those comments, forwards the work plan to the County and the applicant for review, changes are made, then the County drafts a contract that must be approved by the Board. Then work on the draft EIR begins, which takes several months itself."

     2) Stop the Trucks did a review of the County's one month random sample of weigh tickets and we have some additional concerns on this topic as well.

     Although we had originally hoped for the County to review one full year (2008) of weigh tickets, we were informed that County staff would only pick a month at random. We then suggested that the County look at February or March of 2008 when the trucks were running full steam. Instead the County picked November 15th through December 15th when traffic was at a seemingly all time low due to the recession, bad weather and the holidays.

     Although truck traffic was indeed very low, what we found was still very disturbing. 

     First, the sample was missing all tickets from November 15th through 3:00pm on November 18th. Given daily averages of around 15 trucks total a day, that would amount to about 45 missing tickets from those days.

     Next, after reviewing all of the additional documents turned over to the Coalition, we found that from November 18th through December 15th, there are still about 13 tickets completely missing from the sequence. The combined total of missing tickets amounts to about 20% of all tickets for the month, a fairly significant percentage.

     Third, and most significant, of the thirty-three (33) trucks that supposedly came and went through the Ojai Valley, twenty-two (22) were most likely in violation of the time restraints for the Ojai Restricted Zone as described by the County. That amounts to 2/3 of all trips that were in violation. Most of these violations were on the first northbound trips of the day which County staff have so far refused to consider as violations because they claim there is insufficient evidence on the weigh tickets to determine where they came from or where they were going.

     Please bear in mind though that despite the fact that all of the weigh tickets list Ojai as the point of origin, not a single double hopper gravel truck makes it's home overnight in the Ojai Valley. All of these trucks come from somewhere else, be it Oak View, Ventura, Oxnard, etc. And all of them have to travel through the County's restricted zone in order to reach the mine and then return to Ozena. By any reasonable standard these would all clearly be seen as probable violations.

     Although we appreciate the fact that Dan Klemann has recently instructed the operators to clearly identify both the addresses from which the trucks depart from and head to, we sincerely believe that this new instruction should not give the operators and drivers yet another reason to avoid bearing the responsibility for this potential violations during November and December of last year. 

     We are asking the Planning Division to re-inspect these weigh ticket and act in a judicious manner in regards potential violations. 


     3) The "Stop the Trucks" coalition and our legal representatives appreciate the depth and breadth of our concerns over the draft EIR - nevertheless - we continue to be deeply troubled over what we suspect are continuing and ongoing violations of the current and "expired" CUP regarding truck traveling through the Ojai restricted zone during restricted times. Given that the County has a complaint based review and monitoring system, we are once more compelled to call your attention to several ongoing and potentially serious permit violations of the existing EIR that need to be addressed and reviewed by County staff. 

     During the two weeks of June 8th-13th and June 15th-21st, a fleet of between five to seven double hopper, bottom dumping trucks began making multiple runs every day up and down Route 33. 

     During those two weeks these trucks began running up Route 33 and through the Ojai Restricted Zone (as defined by the County) as early as 3:30am. They also consistently rolled through the zone on each day between the 7:00am to 9:00am black out time period and were often seen returning down Route 33 after the 3:00pm black out period. The vehicles were also observed traveling not only through the zone and up the mountain, but also coming southbound through the zone on round trips to Oxnard on the 101.

     Not only were these vehicles in possible violation of permit restrictions, the trucks used also give rise to several concerns regarding public safety. 

     All of the double hopper, bottom dumping trucks (which were run by several different independent trucking firms) were extremely old, banged up and rusted out. (Very different from the new fleet used by Valley Bulk in the past). 

     Trucks of this age are dangerous. They may have older and more polluting engines; potentially unsafe brakes; have a greater tendency to leak gravel onto the highways due to rust, dings and gaps in their seals; and all of them, at 44 feet in length from king pin to rear axle exceed the Route 33 Road Advisory that recommends no trucks over 30 feet from king pin to rear axle travel up and over the mountains of the Los Padres Forest.

     We are requesting that the County pull the weigh tickets for those two weeks for a full review and that those tickets be shared publicly with the Stop the Trucks Coalition.

Thank you,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Ojai Stop the Trucks Coalition

 

 

Ojai Public Meets the Ventura Planning Commission

   The Ventura County Planning Division got an earful from the citizens of the Ojai and Cuyama valleys on May 6th, at Chapparal School auditorium.

     The commission gathered comments for an Environmental Impact Report on a expansion of the Ozena Rock and Gravel Mine. The EIR is required by California law.

     The mine has filed an application to boost its gravel production, and wants to double the number of truck trips through Ojai to 200.  It's also asking to increase the number of allowed hours from seven to over twenty, and also on Saturdays.

     County Planning Director Kim Rodriguez, Supervisor Steve Bennett, and Associate Planner Dan Klemann listened to over twenty speakers.

    CLICK HERE to listen to them yourself.

 

From the Ojai Valley News

Ozena Seeks 200 Daily Truck Trips

If approved, mine would double traffic through Ojai Valley, May 6 hearing set for Chaparral

By Sondra Murphy

     The next round of battles against increased diesel truck traffic through Ojai is coming soon.

     If approved, Ozena Valley Ranch Mine could bring 200 gravel trucks a day through the Ojai Valley on Highway 33, doubling their current allowance.

     The Ventura County Planning Division has scheduled an environmental impact report scoping meeting for May 6 at 6 p.m. in Chaparral Auditorium, 414 E. Ojai Ave. 

     All interested persons and affected agencies are invited to attend the meeting in order to assist the Resource Management Agency and county planning division identify any issues that should be addressed in the EIR and to provide comments on the scope of analysis of the EIR.

     The proposed project site is located in Lockwood Valley in the northern portion of the unincorporated area of Ventura County, near Highway 33 and Lockwood Valley Road. It seeks to expand the Ozena Valley Ranch Mine, a gravel mine and processing facility, and to introduce fish farm activities on the project site. 

     The latter would include raising for sale bass, catfish, trout and other California Department of Fish and Game-approved species in stock ponds. The mine also hopes to raise mosquito-eating gambusi in separate, above-ground vessels.

     The RMA and Planning Division have determined that the proposed project has the potential to create significant and adverse impacts, which must be analyzed as part of the EIR. Those impacts include transportation, noise, lighting glare, air quality, visual, archaeology, and hydraulic hazards or flooding within proximity to the Cuyama The proposed project includes the continuation of a nine-acre stock pond and processing of sand and rock for sale, as well as the delivery of aggregate products via Highway 33, north- and southbound through Lockwood Valley to Interstate 5. Production limitations are expected to remain at 250,000 tons and a daily average of 66 one-way trips each year.

     The mine also proposes the excavation of a second 15-acre, 40-feet-deep stock pond, resulting in the processing of about 750,000 cubic yards of sand and rock for sale, the importation of recyclable concrete and asphalt with which to process aggregate, the importation of aggregate materials and the increase in the daily maximum, one-way truck trips to 200. It is unclear how many of those trips would pass through the Ojai Valley.

     “We are really busy with our lawyers and consumed with analyzing this project from the angle of the applicable (California Environ-mental Quality Act) laws and that’s really what this hearing is about,” said Michael Shapiro, chairperson of Stop the Trucks! “We are communicating to the scores of people who wish to be in attendance that this is not a lynch mob, but a hearing to evaluate the EIR and what can be done to mitigate the impacts. That’s where our focus should be.”

     Shapiro said there will be another meeting before the Ventura County Planning Division in which concerns may be voiced regarding the impacts to water, air quality and other environmental issues. “Part of the project requires they ship this product and right now they’re choosing to ship down Highway 33,” Shapiro said. “This highway was built in 1933 during the Roosevelt (Work Projects Admin-istration.) People could never have imagined that it would be someday a major industrial corridor … We think there is something very, very wrong in forcing Ojai, that has nothing whatsoever to do with industry, to accept a by-product of industry flowing into this valley, especially since there are other sources of aggregate that Caltrans could get without having to punish Ojai into being an unintended victim to satisfy their need for aggregate. So these are some of the broader issues we’re looking at.”

     Shapiro added that STT’s lawyers are attempting to come up with a compromise with the mine. “If Ozena made an agreement with us, like Diamond Rock, that they would not send aggregate down 33, then we would not press the environmental issues,” said Shapiro. “In short, there’s a way out of expensive litigation that would drag, inevitably, the County of Ventura and Caltrans in; a very big mess and expensive. That potential could all go away the second Ozena says they are not sending trucks out on Highway 33.”

     Besides allowing citizen input, the meeting should help to clarify the details of traffic and operations by Ozena Mine. “We are urging the citizens of all ages throughout the Ojai Valley to attend this Ventura County scoping meeting on May 6 at 6 p.m. in Chaparral Auditorium,” said Shapiro.

 

March 28, 2009

Dear Kim Rodriguez,

     In accordance with the expressed written wishes of the Deputy CEO of Ventura County, Matt Carroll, we are forwarding all of our current complaints directly to you for adjudication. We therefore ask that you add these latest incidents below to our list of formal complaints:

As a preface, please note: 

A) That all of the complaints below apply only if the vehicles in question were either going to or from the Ozena Valley Ranch mining operation.

B) Further, none of the fully loaded double hoppers gravel trucks spotted were covered. Although County staff has echoed John Hecht, the agent for Ozena, and his claims that loaded trucks do not have to be covered under the State Highway Code, a simple reading of the C.U.P. clearly indicates that there is a higher standard in the C.U.P. that Ozena continually fails to meet.

On Page 13, of C.U.P. 5170, Condition 30, (Prevention of Construction Material Spillage) states:

     "Before loaded trucks travel outside the processing area (i.e. before crossing the Cuyama River) as identified on the Site Plan (Exhibit 4), the permitee shall ensure all trucks leaving the area are constructed, covered, loaded to prevent any of the contents from dropping, sifting, leaking blowing, spilling or otherwise escaping from the vehicle onto private or public roadways or the Cuyama River." 

 
     We fully believe that any truck coming from Ozena must comply with the C.U.P. as written.

C) The existing C.U.P. for Ozena indicates that all vehicles must follow Caltrans and the State of California Advisory Guidelines in regards truck length (King Pin To Rear Axle) on rural highways. The 2001 C.U.P. for Ozena incorrectly suggests that this length for Route 33 is 38 feet. In fact, as can be seen from the attached photo, the posted length at the start of Maricopa Highway is actually only 30 feet. 

     According to Brent Beall, manufacturer of the bottom dump trailers that Valley Bulk, Ortiz and other companies use, the measurement from the King Pin of the semi to center of the rear axle of the pull trailer is 535". This translates into 44.4 feet.

     If this is correct, then it would appear that the trailers used by Ortiz, Valley Bulk and other bottom dumpers for all of these years on the Ozena runs over the mountains through Ojai would be in violation not only of the 30 foot advisory posted by CalTrans but also of the 38-foot length incorrectly listed in the 2001 C.U.P. for Ozena. 


D) All of the sightings and complaints below occurred in the narrow definition of the Ojai restricted as was recently promulgated by the Planning Director in a map she created in October of 2008. (see attached) As we discussed at our recent meeting earlier this month with County officials, the Coalition does not accept this narrow interpretation and feels that the discretionary judgment and arcane interpretation of the English language used by County officials to make this claim runs contrary to interests of the public, as it effectively removes safety protections from Nordhoff High School, the Ojai Hospital, a church preschool, our main shopping center at the "Y", several senior citizen housing complexes and the community of Casitas Springs -- a neighborhood so destroyed by traffic that they have been begging for a Route 33 by-pass for years.

 


     In the records turned over to us in response to our second Public Records Requests, we finally learned the source of this narrow re-definition of the restricted zone, a map created by none other than John Hecht, the agent for Ozena, and handed out to drivers last year. (see attached) As Michael Shapiro, our Chairman, noted in regards weigh tickets, allowing Ozena to create this most absurd definition that runs contrary to the interests of public safety and health is a bit like "letting the fox guard the hen house."

E) We believe that the question of whether or not Ozena in regards their C.U.P. has been either , “(A),” a good corporate citizen or, “(B),” they have not been good citizens, can easily be answered by one simple and absolute documentary test of Weigh Tickets. 

     However, in a meeting last July between Matt Carroll and a representative of the Coalition in which we complained about possible violations, the Deputy CEO, indicated that he thought there had only been few recent complaints about Ozena. Our representative disagreed and said that these violations were occurring on a daily basis and should be looked into.

     Had the County Planning Division taken that complaint seriously last summer and had become proactive about investigating Ozena, rather than becoming defensive, there would be no need for "Stop The Trucks" to resort to filing individual complaints.

     Ozena would have either been proven to be “(A),” a good corporate citizen or, “(B),” not a good citizen. All of the time, effort and expense generated by all parties since then, would have been completely unnecessary had the Planning Division taken a "proactive" effort to ascertain the truth.

     We again urge the Planning Division to take the necessary - and well justified - steps to obtain a full year of Ozena Weigh Tickets and work cooperatively with the public to find the truth. 

F) After reviewing the documents Stop the Trucks received from the County several weeks ago, we found:

     - Of the thirty-seven (37) specific days that we have made complaints about and requested investigations, the County has only provided us Weigh Tickets for sixteen (16) of those days. Twenty-one (21) days are missing.

     - The County also failed to enclose any weight tickets from their supposed "One Month" sample from 2008. At six (6) days a week, that is at least another twenty-four (24) weigh tickets they have failed to turn over. This remains a violation of the Public Records guidelines.

     - Of the sixteen (16) days for which they did send weigh tickets, eight (8) days have probably violations, including Bob Walker's complaint of last year.

     - Eight (8) of sixteen (16) days show violations fifty percent (50%) of the time. Of the days that did show violations, most were multiple for that day and constituted a majority of the trips through Ojai.

     In other words, of fifty (51) potential days to review, the County has only provided us with seven (7) that show no violations. That's 14% with no violations and  86% either missing or showing probable violations.

     How is it that the Planning Division keeps excusing Ozena's violations as "minor?"

G) In response to our complaints, John Hecht, the agent for Ozena, provided a Weighmaster Certificate for Alliance but failed to provide one for Tony Virgilio. We have documentation from the state that indicates Mr. Vigilio's certificate may have lapsed for several months prior to Alliance taking over the operation. If this is true, it would indicate serious gap in the credibility of any record keeping by Ozena in regards Weigh Tickets. We challenge Ozena to offer physical proof that Mr. Virgilio's weighmaster license was in full compliance between June of 2008 and October of 2008.

Weighmaster Licensed Locations
Suspense/Delinquent Status

Ventura County

Division Of Measurement Standards
6790 Florin-Perkins Rd. Ste. 100
Sacramento, CA 95828-1812


License   Status   Location
Type  
License Name   City   Telephone   Businesss
Class  
009889   D   Principal   OZENA VALLEY RANCH SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY   (661) 766-2521   56  
HWY 33 LOCKWOOD VALLEY RD.   OZENA VALLEY   93704  

 

Additional Complaints:

#60: On March 9, 2008 an uncovered turquoise Swader double hopper truck was seen cutting east through El Roblar on it's way to Route 33 south. Vehicles of that size are prohibited on El Roblar.

#61: On March 11, 2009, a Swader double hopper truck was seen entering in the restricted zone heading north at 7:17 am, a possible time violation.

#62: On March 13, 2009, a Swader double hopper truck was seen entering the restricted zone heading south at 3:45 pm, another possible time violation.

#63: On March 14, 2009, an uncovered Swader double hopper truck was seen entering the restricted zone heading north at 8:30 am and south at 10:30 am. More possible time violations.

#64: On March 16, 2009, a Swader double hopper truck was seen entering in the restricted zone heading north at 7:33 am, a possible time violation.

#65: On March 17, 2009, a Swader double hopper truck was seen entering in the restricted zone heading south at 3:15 pm, another possible time violation.

#66: On March 18, 2009, three double hopper trucks passed through the restricted zone and headed north towards the mines between 4:00 am and 4:30 am. Later that same day two double hopper trucks were seen entering the restricted zone heading south at 3:45 pm. All are possible time violation.

#67: On March 19, 2009 an uncovered Lawson double hopper truck was seen speeding as it passed the high school and then entered the zone at 1:15 pm, another possible coverage violation.

#68: On March 20, 2009, four double hopper trucks passed through the restricted zone and headed north towards the mines between 3:45 am and 4:45 am. Later two of those double hopper trucks were seen re-entering the restricted zone from the north fully loaded and uncovered between 7:10 am and 7:20 am. The trucks then traveled all the way down the 33 and 101 to Oxnard. Later that same day two more uncovered double hoppers were reported traveling south through the restricted zone at 1:30 pm. We have possible multiple time and coverage violations for this day. 

#69: On March 23, 2009, two double hopper trucks passed through the restricted zone and headed north towards the mines between 5:00 am and 5:15 am. Two double hopper trucks, one of which was an Ortiz bottom dumping style, passed through the restricted zone and headed north towards the mines at 7:15 am. All of these would be time violations as well as possible king pin advisory violations. 

#70: On March 24, 2009, two fully loaded and uncovered double hopper trucks coming south at 7:55 am in the morning drove past the high school and turned south onto Route 33 and then entered the restricted zone. The lead truck (see photos attached) was a turquoise Swader double hopper. The second truck was a white Neilson double. The trucks were tracked going down the 33. They turned south onto the 101 south bound and followed all the way to Oxnard. These were not "local deliveries," and would be clear time violations.

#71: Also on March 24, 2009 at the above vehicles were spotted south bound, three north bound double hoppers vehicles were also seen entering the zone. One - at 8:00 am - was the same frequently seen Ortiz bottom dumper, white with green trim, that was spun out in an accident on upper 33 several years ago. The second was a dark blue double from Lawson at 8:10 am and the third was a Swader at 8:20 am. All would be time violations as well as a possible king pin violation.

#72: On March 25, 2009, three double hoppers violated the zone heading north between 4:30 am and 5:00 am. At 6:04 pm that evening, a fully loaded Swader double hopper may have also violated the zone heading south. 

#73: On March 26, 2009, a white double hopper was spotted violating the zone heading north at 4:35 am and the same vehicle was spotted entering the zone heading south two hours later at 6:40 am. That same afternoon another fully loaded and uncovered white double hopper was spotted going south in the zone at 3:27 pm. A Swader double hopper was also spotted in the zone going south at 3:43 pm. More time violations.

Thank you for reviewing these complaints

Sincerely,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop The Trucks

 

 

March 11, 2009

Dear Kim Rodriguez, Daniel Kleeman, Chris Stephens and Matt Carroll,

Thank you for meeting with our Executive Committee last week. Despite the cordial nature of the meeting, the reality on the roadways through Ojai has only deteriorated since then. We therefore ask that you add these latest incidents below to our list of formal complaints:

#52: We did a quick review of the Reponses to the limited number of our prior complaints that were included in the County's response to our public records request. Unfortunately we found that in almost all cases, blatant and obvious violations of the C.U.P. time schedule existed in almost every instance - and were totally ignored by Planning staff. We will have a more detailed response to all of these Weigh Tickets in the near future. 

#53: Although County staff's echoed John Hecht, the agent for Ozena, and his claims that loaded trucks do not have to be covered under the State Highway Code, a simple reading of the C.U.P. clearly indicates that there is a higher standard in the C.U.P. that Ozena continually fails to meet.

On Page 13, of C.U.P. 5170, Condition 30, (Prevention of Construction Material Spillage) states: "Before loaded trucks travel outside the processing area (i.e. before crossing the Cuyama River) as identified on the Site Plan (Exhibit 4), the permitee shall ensure all trucks leaving the area are constructed, covered, loaded to prevent any of the contents from dropping, sifting, leaking blowing, spilling or otherwise escaping from the vehicle onto private or public roadways or the Cuyama River." 

Is there some other meaning to "covered", that we have failed to understand here? 

#54: On March 3, 2009, the Ventura County Planning Division delivered a large number of documents and records to the Ojai Stop the Trucks which will take the members of the Coalition some time to review. Seemingly missing however from this delivery was the one category of records that could help settle this ongoing dispute, Weigh Tickets from 2008. 

The documents and the accusations on either side are actually just a distraction from the bottom line of this conflict which boils down to one or two very simple questions. Has Ozena in regards their C.U.P. been, “(A),” a good corporate citizen or, “(B),” have they not. 

Fortunately the answer to this question can be easily be determined by one simple and absolute documentary test of Weigh Tickets. 

For example, the one set of weigh tickets that the County has shared with the Coalition so far, the ones for February 8, 2008, show that Ozena was in likely violation that day. In other words, 100% of the weigh tickets now show a 100% probability that Ozena has been in violation, a fact recently confirmed by senior Planning staffer, Dan Kleeman.

Therefore it is easily deduced that any thorough and public analysis of the weigh tickets for Ozena will show whether, (A), they’ve been good corporate citizens, or ,(B), they have not. 

If the records show that Ozena has operated properly over the last year since being informed by the Planning Director, Kim Rodriguez, that the rules will be strictly enforced, then the County will have irrefutably demonstrated that Stop the Trucks has been off base with its complaints. If, however, it turns out that Ozena has been a regular violator of the C.U.P., then the Coalition’s stance will have been shown to be justified.

It is for this reason that the Coalition has repeatedly made requests for a full year’s worth of weight tickets. Let the simple truth be known. Is the answer, (A) or (B)?

We have asked for a full year of data – as opposed to the County’s desire to analyze only one month - in order to get a clear picture of what has been going on up at the mine. Trucking volumes have decreased over the past 12 months due to the recession. 

A one month sample could easily skew the results if the selection included a recession month and a couple of snow storms – such as the month of December 2008, which Kim Rodriguez suggested she might just pick. It might also miss the three - four months between the time this past summer and fall when Tony Virgilio’s Weighmaster Certificate apparently expired and Alliance took over daily operation. Who, for example, was weighing and certifying truck loads in July, August, September and early October? Was it Tony with a possible expired certificate or was Alliance doing it prematurely and in possible violation of the C.U.P. they swore to uphold?

Yes, we’d like for the public to see and be able to analyze one full years worth of weigh tickets from 2008. 

And why wouldn’t the individual staff members of the Planning County Division, the Resource Management Agency, senior administrators, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors also want to settle this dispute once and for all by a simple review of the actual facts embodied in a full years worth of records? 

Everything else before us, every other opinion and document, is merely a distraction based on whether or not one feels that (A) or (B) is correct.

We hope the County government will join us in seeing that this very real and simple test is undertaken and the real truth will become know for all to judge.

 



#55: On Friday, February 27, 2009, a white double hopper truck from Swader left the north end of the restricted zone just after 1:00pm (okay) but them came back down the mountain fully loaded and entered the restricted zone at 3:20 pm. If this truck had been coming form Ozena, this would be another probably violation.

#56: On Monday, March 2, 2009 a red double hopper passed through the zone heading north at 7:05 am. At 7:15 am another Swader double hopper entered the southern end of the restricted zone heading north towards Ozena. At 4:05 pm yet another Swader double hopper was spotted going south through the zone while uncovered. If these trucks here traveling to and form Ozena, this trips would also be potential violations.

#57: On Thursday March 5, 2009 a Swader double hopper truck was spotted headed south bound at 3:30 pm in the restricted zone. Yet another possible violation... 

#58: On Monday, March 9, 2009, there were multiple reports of bottom dumping double hoppers beginning to move through the restricted zone and on up the mountain toward Ozena as early as 3:30 am!!! Several of the trucks spotted were from Ortiz trucking and several others were familiar "rust buckets' -- beat up old double hoppers frequently seen traveling between the mountains, Ojai and Oxnard on Route 33 and the 101 to Vineyard.

#59: On Tuesday, March 10, 2009 trucks again were noted passing north through the restricted zone and elsewhere on 33 in the Ojai Valley heading north. At 7:10 am an Ortiz bottom dumper double hopper was spotted entering the restricted zone form the north fully loaded and uncovered. Just a little over an hour later at 8:05 am the same Ortiz truck was spotted empty running north through the zone.

Between 4:00 pm and 4:30 pm, three more of these bottom dumpers - all of which probably violate the Route 33 "King Pin to Rear Axle" advisory of 30 feet - were spotted going south through the restricted zone while fully loaded and uncovered.

The existing C.U.P. for Ozena indicates that all vehicles must follow Caltrans and the State of California Advisory Guidelines in regards truck length (King Pin To Rear Axle) on rural highways. The 2001 C.U.P. for Ozena incorrectly suggests that this length for Route 33 is 38 feet. In fact, as can be seen from the attached photo, the posted length at the start of Maricopa Highway is actually only 30 feet. 

According to Brent Beall, manufacturer of the bottom dump trailers that Valley Bulk and other companies use, the measurement from the King Pin of the semi to center of the rear axle of the pull trailer is 535". This translates into 44.4 feet.

If this is correct, then it would appear that the trailers used by Ortiz and other bottom dumpers for all of these years on the Ozena runs over the mountains through Ojai would be in violation not only of the 30 foot advisory posted by Caltrans but also of the 38 foot length incorrectly listed in the 2001 C.U.P. for Ozena. 535 inches translates into 44.4 feet.

If any of these vehicles had been coming or going to Ozena, their trips would constitute yet additional potential violations. 


Sincerely,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks

 

 

February 21, 2009

Dan Klemann, M.A., Senior Planner
County of Ventura, Resource Management Agency, Planning Division
800 S. Victoria Avenue, L#1740
Ventura, CA 93009
(805) 654-3588 phone
(805) 654-2509 fax
daniel.klemann@ventura.org



     Dear Daniel Kleeman, 

     The Ojai Stop the Trucks Coalition categorically rejects your dismissal of the Bob Walker, February 2008 complaint which Mr. Walker submitted in conjunction with the Coalition and is hereby officially re-submitting the original complaint, at the bottom of this letter.

1. In the second paragraph of your February 17, 2009, letter to Mr. Walker, you seemingly dismiss the validity of his complaint because his residence is outside the Ojai restricted zone. You wrote, "Therefore, it cannot be determined from the information in your complaint that the trucks you observed did in fact travel through the ORR and, if so, at what time they did so." Your analysis not only disregards the obvious fact that a truck traveling past Mr. Walker's house between the Ozena Valley and Oxnard MUST pass through the ORR because there are NO other usable roads between those points, your time analysis completely contradicts the "Sample Travel Times for the Ozena C.U.P." that you helped create on January 6, 2009. 

     Furthermore, your statement also confirms the very point Stop the Trucks has been making for two years: The Planning Division does not have any ability to monitor compliance with this C.U.P. and therefore it should never have been granted or even considered for renewal.

2. If any one had bothered to look closely at the sequence of Weigh Tickets provided by Ozena for that day, the very first thing an analyst would notice is that the tickets are stamped out of order and several are filled in by hand. THESE ARE BOTH SERIOUS VIOLATIONS IN AND OF THEMSELVES.

 

13157 8:58 am
13158 9:13 am
13159 9:56 am
13160 9:57 am
13161 9:56 am
13162 9:57 am
13163 9:56 am
13164 10:46 am (handwritten)
13165 10:50 am (handwritten)
13166 11:22 am
13167 11:22 am


     Although these errors are considered violations in an of themselves, there are often indicative of a much greater violations: Other than the fact it is physically impossible to load and weigh five 80,000 pound trucks in two minutes, it may well be tickets 13159 through 13163 were all held and stamped independent of the actually weighing and loading time, rendering them unacceptable evidence. We have raised this question before in 2007 and 2008 and no one in Planning ever came up with an acceptable rational for this behavior. 

3. Handwritten tickets are also completely unacceptable because weights and hours can be completely manipulated at will. Because the information on these tickets appears to be fungable, we also consider it highly questionable that the Planning Division is going back to Ozena and/or Alliance and/or West Coast Environmental & Engineering for evidence of compliace. Given that the mine operator and their agent, West Coast Environmental & Engineering (aka John Hecht) have much at stake in possibly concealing any suspected violations, we would insist that the only acceptable copies weigh tickets are those that come directly from the state office of Weights and Measures

     Again your examination only reinforces our point: You have no ability to monitor this C.U.P.


4. The existing C.U.P. for Ozena indicates that all vehicles must follow Caltrans and the State of California Advisory Guidelines in regards truck length (King Pin To Rear Axle) on rural highways. The 2001 C.U.P. for Ozena incorrectly suggests that this length for Route 33 is 38 feet. In fact, as can be seen from the attached photo, the posted length at the start of Maricopa Highway is actually only 30 feet. 




     According to Brent Beall, manufacturer of the bottom dump trailers that Valley Bulk and other companies use, the measurement from the King Pin of the semi to center of the rear axle of the pull trailer is 535". This translates into 44.4 feet.

     If this is correct, then it would appear that the trailers used by Valley Bulk and other bottom dumpers for all of these years on the Ozena runs over the mountains through Ojai would be in violation not only of the 30 foot advisory posted by Caltrans but also of the 38 foot length incorrectly listed in the 2001 C.U.P. for Ozena. 535 inches translates into 44.4 feet.

     In other words, potentially every single Valley Bulk double hopper in use for deliveries from the Ozena mine has been in possible violation of the state highway standards for safety by almost 50%! This would potentially include each and every Valley Bulk truck in Bob Walker's February 2008 complaint. 

     According to the C.U.P., Ozena must insure that all vehicles they laod are safe for the roads they will use.


     It is little wonder that accidents such as these pictured below have occurred with such alarming frequency:

     In categorically rejecting your response, the Stop the Trucks Coalition also formally requests that the Planning Division immediate take the necessary steps to suspend the Ozena C.U.P. because of a total lack of ability of the county to monitor this operation and because of numerous possible violations of the existing C.U.P.


Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks


cc: Kim Rodriguez, and Carole Aragon, Board of Supervisors, Matt Carroll, Marty Robinson

 

 


Formal Ozena trucking complaint of February 8, 2008

Ojai, CA. 93023

February 13, 2008

Carole Aragon
Patrick Richard, Acting Director
County of Ventura
Planning Division 
800 South Victoria Ave.
Ventura, CA 93009

Dear Carole and Patrick:

     I am sending you this formal complaint in response to seven trucks that I witnessed on February 8, 2008 violating Ozena Sand and Gravel Mine's hauling time restrictions. 

     At 8:40 A.M. two Southbound Swader trucks hauling 3/8" gravel passed in front of my house. That would put those trucks in the Ojai City limits during the restricted time. Also, I witnessed five Northbound, empty, Valley Bulk trucks in front of my house starting at 8:45 A.M. This would place the trucks passing through the Ojai Valley during the restricted times. The first Valley Bulk truck returned Southbound loaded with washed concrete sand at 11:03 A.M.and the second truck at 11:06 A.M. 

     The roads had been closed due to the recent snows. As soon as they were open, the trucks went right back to their old habits.

Sincerely,

 Bob Walker.


 

 

 

 

Diesel Fuel spills into Creek after Truck Crash


From Ventura County Star staff reports
Originally published 9:29 a.m., January 30, 2009
Updated 9:29 a.m., January 30, 2009 

     An estimated 1,000 gallons of fuel spilled into a creek in the Los Padres National Forest this morning after a truck hauling diesel crashed on Highway 33, authorities said.  

     The crash was reported about 5 a.m. near Cherry Creek Circle in the Lockwood Valley area, according to the California Highway Patrol. The truck, which was hauling diesel fuel, was abandoned after the crash, said Officer Matt Winter of the Ventura CHP.  The highway patrol is investigating the crash and looking into the possibility the truck may have been hauling fuel improperly, Winter said.

     Ventura County firefighters responded to the scene and found an estimated 1,700 gallons of spilled fuel, about 1,000 gallons of which spilled into a nearby creek, fire department officials said.  The fire department’s hazardous materials team responded to the scene.  Fire department and highway patrol officials remained on scene at 9 a.m.  
Officials from the California Department of Fish and Game were also on their way to the crash site this morning.

 

 

All, 


Please find attached communication from the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council concerning issues surrounding enforcement of conditions of approval for the Ozena Valley Ranch Mining CUP. 


Thank you, 
Russ Baggerly

MAC President.

CLICK HERE to see or download the document, in .pdf format.

 

 


Westbound on Ojai Avenue, 1 PM on Martin Luther King day.  

 

February 21, 2009

Dear Kim Rodriguez, Daniel Kleeman and Carole Aragon,

Please add these latest incidents below to our list of formal complaints:

#48: The exisiting C.U.P. for Ozena indicates that all vehicles must follow Caltrans and the State of California Advisory Guidelines in regards truck length (King Pin To Rear Axle) on rural highways. The 2001 C.U.P. for Ozena incorrectly suggests that this length for Route 33 is 38 feet. In fact, as can be seen from the attached photo, the posted length at the start of Maricopa Highway is actually only 30 feet. 

According to Brent Beall, manufacturer of the bottom dump trailers that Valley Bulk and other companies use, the measurement from the King Pin of the semi to center of the rear axle of the pull trailer is 535". This translates into 44.4 feet.

If this is correct, then it would appear that the trailers used by Valley Bulk and other bottom dumpers for all of these years on the Ozena runs over the mountains through Ojai would be in violation not only of the 30 foot advisory posted by Caltrans but also of the 38 foot length incorrectly listed in the 2001 C.U.P. for Ozena. 535 inches translates into 44.4 feet.

In other words, potentially every single Valley Bulk double hopper in use for deliveries from the Ozena mine has been in possible violation of the state highway standards for safety by almost 50%! This would potentially include each and every Valley Bulk truck in Bob Walker's February 2008 complaint. (This is on top of the Planning Division's incorrect analysis of the time stamp data on the weigh tickets.)


It is little wonder that accidents, such as these pictures that are attached, occur with such alarming frequency:

#49: On February 10, 2009 at 7:14 am, a double hopper gravel truck heading north on Route 33 were tracked going through the restricted zone. If this vehicles had been going to Ozena, the trip would constitute yet additional potential violations. 

#50: On February 11, 2009 at 7:25 am, and 7:31 am two double hopper gravel trucks heading north on Route 33 were tracked entering and going through the restricted zone. If this vehicles had been going to Ozena, the trip would constitute yet additional potential violations. 

#51: On February 12, 2009 four double hoppers were tracked entering the restricted zone from the north in apparent violations for failing to have their loads tarped between 1:17 pm and 1:37 pm. The first and thrid were from Swader. The second was a dark black or brown cab with white trailers. The fourth was a blue cab with blue stripped trailers. If any of these vehicles had been going to Ozena, their trips would constitute yet additional potential violations. 

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks



February 4, 2009


Dear Kim Rodriguez and Carole Aragon,

Please add these latest incidents below to our list of formal complaints:

#45: On February 2, 2009 2:29 pm, a double hopper gravel truck heading from Swader allegedly cut through residential streets to go via La Luna Road from Highway 150 north to Route 33, thus attempting to illegally by-pass a section of the restricted zone. Trucks over three axles are forbidden to go on La Luna. If this truck was heading to Ozena, it would constitute a clear violation of traffic rules.

On that same day, a tan colored double hopper was tracked entering the restricted zone from the north and exiting from the south in Casitas Springs at 3:21 pm. It was fully loaded but as usual, uncovered. If this truck was coming from Ozena, it would constitute a clear violation of the C.U.P.

#46: On February 3, 2009 between 8:05 am and 8:17 am, four double hopper gravel truck heading north on Route 33 were tracked going through the restricted zone. The first one had a black cab and two yellow hoppers, the next two were from Swader, and the fourth had a blue cab with white hoppers. If any of these vehicles had been going to Ozena, their trips would constitute yet additional potential violations. 

#47: On February 4, 2009 three double hoppers were tracked entering the restricted zone from the south in apparent violations. The first was a 5:50 am, and was a white double hopper. The next two at 7:05 am and 7:18 am, were from Swader. If any of these vehicles had been going to Ozena, their trips would constitute yet additional potential violations. 

Later that day, at 4:01 pm two heavily rusted out bottom dumping style double hopper trucks entered the restricted zone from the north and traveled all the way through and out at Casitas Spring. If any of these vehicles had been coming from Ozena, their trips would constitute yet additional potential violations, as they were traveling with uncovered loads.


Also attached is a recent letter to the Ventura County Planning Commission, in which the Chair of the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council, Russ Baggerly, wrote:
"The Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council (MAC) has heard numerous complaints and concerns from residents of the Ojai Valley about the Ozena Mine violating many conditions of its Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P). It is up to the Planning Division to enforce these conditions and we are deeply concerned that very little is being done to 
enforce the conditions of approval...."

And, "...it occurs to the MAC that you should be considering that an appropriate action would be to terminate the Ozena Mine's temporary C.U.P. until the past violations, alleged violations and new EIR are completely resolved. This is a matter of vital concern to the MAC for the ongoing safety, air quality concerns, health and welfare of the residents of the Ojai Valley. "


Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks



January 30, 2009

Dear Kim and Carole,

Please add these latest incidents below to our list of formal complaints.

#42: Recently Robert Kwong, County Counsel assigned to the Planning Division, called the lawyers for 'Stop the Trucks" and allegedly informed them that the County doesn't have any of the documents we had requested in our Public Request of December. A copy of that request, originally sent to Chris Stephens, with cc's going to Marty Robinson, Matt Carroll and Noel Klebaum, is attached.

Given that we were requesting, for example documents that clearly exist, such as those related to the recently concluded "Virgilio vs Ventura County" court case; the documents related to the recently proposed and responded to RFP to review the EIR for the Ozena C.U.P. renewal; and the weigh tickets from Ozena, including those recently reviewed by the Planning Director; such as response - if true - borders on the comical and absurd. Our attorneys asked Mr. Kwong to put that opinion in writing.

We hope that Mr. Kwong's statement was merely an oversight and all of the requested documents will be forthcoming.

#43: Today's accident on Route 33 allegedly involving two trucks that caused a major spill of diesel fuel into the watershed near the Cuyama valley, highlights the dangers of any big rig driving up and over six thousand foot high mountains on this narrow, winding two line highway through the national forest and along side the very rivers and streams that flow into our supply of drinking water. 

It also highlights the fact that there was never any traffic safety or road safety reviews in any of the MND's approved to date by the Planning Commission, despite the fact there their have been many documented gravel truck accidents and a road collapse on Route 33 in recent years.

A preliminary survey of the few documents we have obtained through our earlier Public Records Requests indicate that no substantive traffic or road safety studies have been planned for the upcoming EIR review required for Ozena's permit renewal. This too is a situation that can not be tolerated given the history of this roadway. We hope you can explain this apparent oversight as well.

#44: On January 30, 2009 between 1:15 pm and 1:45 pm four UNCOVERED but fully loaded double hopper gravel truck heading south on Route 33 were tracked going through the restricted zone. Two were from Swader, the third was a white cab with two dark blue hoppers and the fourth was a white but heavily rusted out bottom dumping style double hopper. If any of these vehicles had been coming from Ozena, their trips would constitute yet additional potential violations, as they were traveling with uncovered loads in the middle of Santa Ana high wind conditions.

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks

_______________________________________________________________________


    
lso attached is a recent letter to the Ventura County Planning Commission, in which the Chair of the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council, Russ Baggerly, wrote:

      "The Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council (MAC) has heard numerous complaints and concerns from residents of the Ojai Valley about the Ozena Mine violating many conditions of its Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P). It is up to the Planning Division to enforce these conditions and we are deeply concerned that very little is being done to 
enforce the conditions of approval...."
And, 

     "...it occurs to the MAC that you should be considering that an appropriate action would be to terminate the Ozena Mine's temporary C.U.P. until the past violations, alleged violations and new EIR are completely resolved. This is a matter of vital concern to the MAC for the ongoing safety, air quality concerns, health and welfare of the residents of the Ojai Valley. "


Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks

#37: On January 26, 2009 at 7:11 am a blue and white double hopper gravel truck (trailer style) heading north on Route 33 was tracked entering the restricted zone and followed. If this vehicle had been going to Ozena, that might well constitute yet another potential violation. 

38: On January 28, 2009 at 7:05 am a white double hopper gravel truck (bottom dumper style) heading north on Route 33 was tracked entering the restricted zone and followed. If this vehicle had been going to Ozena, that might well constitute yet another potential violation.  
 
Also attached is a copy of the full complaint referenced in Item #30 below that we presented to Matt Carroll in July. It was originally mailed to Marty Robinson a few weeks earlier. 

#39: On January 28, 2009 at 5:30 pm a white double hopper gravel truck heading north on Route 33 was tracked passing through the restricted zone. If this vehicle had been going to Ozena, that might well constitute yet another potential violation. 

#40: On January 29, 2009 at 6:00 am another UNCOVERED but fully loaded double hopper gravel truck heading south on Route 33 was tracked in the restricted zone. If this vehicle had been coming from Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation, particularly since it was - as always - traveling with an uncovered load.

#41: On January 29, 2009 at 7:14 am a blue and white double hopper gravel truck (trailer style) heading north on Route 33 was tracked entering the restricted zone by the Arnaz Grade. If this vehicle had been going to Ozena, that might well constitute yet another potential violation. 

 


January 24, 2009

Dear Kim Rodriguez and Carole Aragon, 

     Please add these latest items and incidents below to our list of formal complaints. Please note, however, that the Coalition expects the Planning Division to meet all of the requirements for handling complaints, including those related to timeliness, as noted in the original C.U.P., Section 13 (on page 9) which deals with the resolution of complaints. The conditions therein specifically require that:
(a) All complaints received by the County shall be directed to the permittee's contact person established pursuant to Condition No. 12. Contact Person.

(b) As soon as possible, but no later than one day after receiving a complaint from the County or a citizen, the permittee shall investigate the complaint. 

(c) The permittee shall report his findings to the complainant and the Planning Director as soon as possible, but no later than one day after receiving a complaint, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in question.

(d) If the investigation of a complaint by the permittee indicates a possible violation, the permittee shall take prompt action to correct the potential problem.

(e) If the problem persists, the County Planning Division shall initiate complaint resolution actions as contained in the Ventura County Zoning Ordinance then in effect.

#30: As a result of evidence presented during the recent "Virgilio Vs Ventura County" we are also resubmitting our complaint of July 2008, regarding massive violations of Condition 72 during the months of July and August 2007, which was originally delivered to Deputy County CEO Matt Carroll 

  In "Virgilio vs. County of Ventura" county lawyers acknowledged that a number of Planning Division staffers had made numerous errors in regards understanding and enforcing the C.U.P but "planners have no power to change the terms (of the C.U.P.) approved by the Planning Commission. " County lawyers further noted, "staff's misapplication of the Condition passively allowing truck travel during prohibited times does not and cannot effectuate a change to the Condition approved and adopted by the Commission." 

     County Counsel went on to argue that: "to the contrary, Planning staff has a ministerial duty to apply and enforce all Truck Travel conditions as they were approved by the Planning Commission." "The clear and present duty of the County Planning Division is its ongoing ministerial duty to apply and enforce the Condition as written and approved by the Planning Commission and re-adopted in Mod 1."


     Lawyers for the county apparently made such a good case in noting both the apparent violations of the C.U.P. by Ozena and the failure of the Planning Division to enforce the guidelines that Judge Reiser, in a footnote, went so far as to state that, "The initial permit allows for a five-year extension if the Planning Director, assuming, 'all conditions have been continuously complied with' by petitioners, authorizes such continued use. Since the County has already found permit violations; it might well be an abuse for the Planning Director to authorize such an extension." 

     In a letter to John Hecht, the agent for Ozena, in December of 2007, the Planning Director made an arbitrary decision that Ozena would not be responsible for "past" violations. 

     It makes as much sense for the Planning Director to dismiss possible "past violations" as it would for the District Attorney to dismiss murder charges as the murder happened in the past.

     How can the public and the Coalition consider the Planning Director's decision to not consider past violations anything but a possible abuse of her discretion. 

     Furthermore, given the extremely high percentages of daily violations of the permit schedule that were found in a two month sampling of data from 2007 by both the County's Deputy CEO and the Coalition, how was the agency was able to determine that the mine operators had been in continuous compliance? The Coalition's review alone noted that possibly 40% of all trips and 55% of trips through Ojai were in violation.

     Were there an appropriate, timely and proper investigation of the alleged violations, it can easily be argued that the extension for Ozena would have already been terminated.

# 31A through #31K: 

     The Coalition has made and repeatedly referenced several public records requests for all weigh tickets from Ozena. We have reported unconfirmed allegations that weigh tickets may or may not have been falsified or written up by hand. To date, the Planning Division has failed to turn over any of these weigh tickets, which, in and of itself could be considered a clear a violation of state law and public policy. 

     Furthermore, the Planning Division has failed to respond according to the guidelines established in Section 13, including, but not limited to those of timeliness.

     Because of that failure to respond under Section 13 and because of the total failure of the Planning Division to provide any physical evidence whatsoever supporting the Planning Director's claim on page two, paragraph three of her January 14, 2009 letter to the "Stop the Trucks" Coalition, we are resubmitting all of these complaints From Stop the Trucks from February 8, 2008 through January 6, 2009 (below) and supporting them with further information or clarifications when available. 

     Given this history, there is simply no way any intelligent citizen of Ventura County could credibly accept any analysis of records by the Planning Division without the very physical evidence the Division appears to be adamant about withholding from public scrutiny.

     In her letter of January 14th, the Planning Director wrote, "It cannot be concluded that if a truck is observed in Ojai then it traveled to or from the Ozena mine." In other words, short of a competent analysis of weigh tickets, the Planning Division has absolutely no ability to monitor C.U.P. compliance. Such monitoring is a fundamental requirement of CEQA, with out which no permit should be granted, much less extended. 

#31A: On January 2, 2009, a white double hopper gravel truck came south fully loaded but uncovered and/or without a tarp down Route 33 and into the Ojai restricted zone at 3:23 pm. If this vehicle had been coming from Ozena, that would constitute yet another potential violation.

#31B: Today, January 6, 2009, a white double hopper gravel truck with a white cab with brown trim came south, also fully loaded but uncovered and/or without a tarp, on Route 33 into the Ojai restricted zone, past the high school and hospital and then turned left at the "y" and headed through downtown Ojai at 7:53 am. Five minutes later, a Swader double hopper came north up 33 through the restricted zone and then drove past the high school at 7:58 am. 

     Later that same day, a Swader double hopper gravel truck entered the Ojai restricted zone heading south fully loaded but uncovered and/or without a tarp on Route 33 at 3:08 pm and continued south all the way through Casitas Springs.

     If these trucks were coming from Ozena, these too would constitute violations.


#31C: On Tuesday, December 30, 2008 beginning at around 4:25 pm one of our Coalition members spotted a light blue double hopper gravel truck, possibly one from Swader, passing through the restricted zone and then through the "Y" at Ojai, all the while heading north on Route 33. The truck continued north past the high school and hospital. The spotter trailed the truck for a considerable length of time as it proceeded up Maricopa Highway and towards Ozena. 

#31D: On December 26, 2008, Friday, the day after Christmas, two double hopper gravel trucks came south with full loads that were uncovered and/or without a tarp on Route 33 and past by the Ojai Hospital and Nordhoff High School at 3:45 pm. They continued south through the restricted zone. If they were coming from Ozena, that would be yet another violation of the C.U.P. 

#31E: This morning, December 18, 2008, and only hours after Route 33 was cleared of snow and re-opened to traffic, a dark blue, double hopper truck from Pride Trucking passed north through the restricted zone and then by Nordhoff High School just as students were arriving. This was around 7:37 am, in apparent violation of the allowed hours of travel through the Ojai Valley.

#31F: On December 10, 2008 at about 4:40 am a double hopper truck apparently passed through the restricted zone then by the hospital & high school heading north toward Ozena well before allowable hours. 

Later that same morning what appeared to be the same vehicle, a light blue truck from Swader (fully loaded but uncovered and/or without a tarp) heading south through the restricted zone then left the restricted zone near Casitas Springs at about 7:10 am. 

This afternoon, at precisely 3:24 pm two more double hopper, both white in color, came south fully loaded but uncovered and/or without a tarp) from the direction of Ozena and again passed by the high school and hospital and then south through the restricted zone. If correct, all of these would have be potential violations.

#31G: On Tuesday, December 9, 2008, between 8:22 am and 8:25 am we spotted three double hopper gravel trucks apparently violating the Ozena C.U.P. by heading north on Route 33 in the Ojai Valley restricted zone. 

That same afternoon we spotted three more double hopper trucks, two of which were from Swader, apparently violating the C.U.P. by traveling south bound (fully loaded but uncovered and/or without a tarp) through the Ojai restricted zone between 3:21 pm and 3:50 pm, which would, once again, put them right in front of Nordhoff High School as students are leaving for the day.

#31H: On Monday, December 8, 2008 I spotted two more Swader double hopper gravel trucks apparently violating the C.U.P. by traveling south bound fully loaded but uncovered through the Ojai restricted zone at 3:33 pm and at 3:38 pm, which would again put them right in front of Nordhoff High School as students are leaving for the day.

#31I: On December 3, 2008, a double hopper truck went through the restricted zone north up Maricopa Highway (Route 33) past the high school and hospital towards Ozena at 4:40 am, well before the 6:00 am to 7:00 am allowable access through the Ojai Valley. 

At 7:10 am another double hopper, this one from Swader trucking also went through the restricted zone and then past the high school heading north as students were arriving.

At 7:18 am, a third double hopper - possible another one from Swader - also headed north (through the restricted zone).

About ten minutes later, at 7:30 am, a fourth truck was spotted doing the same. The last two trucks were the same color as the Swader trucks but their logos were hard to identify at the speed they were traveling.

#31J On Friday morning, November 21st, I personally witnessed two double hopper gravel trucks heading north on Route 33 go through the restricted zone and the "Y" intersection between 7:30 am and 8:00 am in direct violation of the C.U.P. limits on hours of travel through the valley.

#31K At 7:15 am today, November 24th, I personally witnessed one double hopper gravel truck from Swader Trucking heading up Route 33 through the restricted zone and past Nordhoff High School in direct violation of the C.U.P. limits on hours of travel through the valley.

This afternoon I personally witnessed four different double hopper gravel trucks each fully loaded but uncovered and/or without a tarp, coming down through the restricted zone on Route 33 apparently from the Ozena Valley Ranch and Gravel Mine. The trucks all passed through the Ojai valley between 3:00 pm and 3:30 pm, also in violation of the C.U.P.


#31L Formal Ozena trucking complaint of February 8, 2008 from Bob Walker.

     I am sending you this formal complaint in response to seven trucks that I witnessed on February 8, 2008 violating Ozena Sand and Gravel Mine's hauling time restrictions. At 8:40 A.M. two Southbound Swader trucks hauling 3/8" gravel passed in front of my house. That would put those trucks in the Ojai City limits during the restricted time. Also, I witnessed five Northbound, empty, Valley Bulk trucks in front of my house starting at 8:45 A.M. This would place the trucks passing through the Ojai Valley during the restricted times. The first Valley Bulk truck returned Southbound loaded with washed concrete sand at 11:03 A.M.and the second truck at 11:06 A.M. The roads had been closed due to the recent snows. As soon as they were open, the trucks went right back to their old habits.
Sincerely, Bob Walker.

#32: In the Planning Director's letter of January 14, 2009 to the Stop the Trucks Coalition, the Director alleges a new interpretation of Condition #72 that is unsupported by any evidence whatsoever. 

     Her interpretation not only contradicts wording used in every single Planning Division letter and communication to County officials and the Board of Supervisors, including the 2003 C.U.P. modification approval letter, it may also well be looked upon as another possible abuse of discretion.

     The phrase in the "Day and Hours of Operation" Chart in Condition 72 reads as follows: "All project related travel on Highway 33 between Casitas Spring and City of Ojai." The Planning Director believes the word "between" allows her to exclude both Casitas Springs and the City of Ojai from the restricted zone. The Planning Director created a new map on November 17, 2008 – eight years after the Planning Commission approved the C.U.P. - indicating her determination of the restricted zone along Route 33 in the Ojai Valley. 

     Such an interpretation would mean for example that "consensual sex between two adults" did not involve either party, only the space "between them." Or that the American Civil War, "The War between the States," did not actually involve any states, just the people standing on the Mason-Dixon line. Or that a Conditional Use Permit "between" the County of Ventura and the Ozena Valley Ranch does not actually bind either party, just the space "between" them.

     Perhaps such an absurdist's proposition could be argued over endlessly by lawyers, but again, we repeat the words of county counsel: "…planners have no power to change the terms (of the C.U.P.) approved by the Planning Commission. " and "…to the contrary, Planning staff has a ministerial duty to apply and enforce all Truck Travel conditions as they are approved by the Planning Commission." And, "the 'clear and present duty' of the County Planning Division is its ongoing ministerial duty to apply and enforce the Condition as written and approved by the Planning Commission and re-adopted in Mod 1.

     If this bizarre action on the part of the Planning Director to modify and constrain the restricted zone does not constitute an abuse of her discretion, what does?

#33: In the same January letter the Planning Director wrote: "Some weigh tickets indicated that trucks did leave Ozena mine at times of day that would indicate a potential violation; however those tickets indicate the trucks had an Ojai destination which would not have resulted in a violation of Condition No. 72." 

The C.U.P. Makes no exemption for local delivery. The condition reads: "All project related travel on Highway 33 between Casitas Springs and City of Ojai."

Again, in the words of County Counsel, "…planners have no power to change the terms (of the C.U.P.) approved by the Planning Commission. " The Planning Director's reveals not only another possible lapse of judgment but a further abuse of her powers.

#34 On January 19. 2009, over a dozen double hopper trucks were reported passing through the restricted zone. Trucks were spotted heading north as early as 5:30 am and south as late as 5:40 pm. None of the southbound trucks were covered or tarped. Several passed through the zone during the 7:00 am to 9:00 am black out. And at least three passed through the zone after the 3:00 pm cut off. If these vehicles had been coming from or going to Ozena, most of those trips would constitute potential violations, particularly since they were - as always - traveling with uncovered loads. 


#35: On Wednesday, January 21, 2009 a south bound double hopper, which was uncovered, passed through the restricted zone about 3:27 pm. If this vehicle had been coming from Ozena, it would constitute a potential time violation, particularly since it was - as always - traveling with an uncovered load. 


#36: On Thursday, January 22, 2009, a north bound white double hopper entered the zone at Casitas Springs and proceeded north at around 7:05 am. If heading to Ozena, this too would constitute a violation.

Sincerely,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks

 

 


Dear Marty Robinson, Matt Carroll & Noel Klebaum,

     On January 7, 2009, representatives of the Ojai "Stop the Trucks" Coalition, including Chair, Michael Shapiro; Vice Chair, Howard Smith; and committee members, Stan Green; and Craig Beam, met with senior Ventura County executives, including County CEO Marty Robinson, Deputy CEO Matt Carroll, and County Counsel, Noel Klebaum. A number of generalized questions, concerns or issues were raised by the Coalition in regards both the annual and ongoing reviews of the Ozena Valley Ranch Gravel Mine C.U.P.

     The Coalition promised a good faith effort to create a more specific list of those concerns with the hope that the County would also make a good faith effort to consider those issues as it undertakes its various reviews and audits of the Ozena permit and renewal.

     What follows below is the Coalition's first attempt to present those concerns as regards to monitoring the original C.U.P. Although the Coalition has attempted to make the list as thorough as possible, it is quite possible that we've overlooked additional issues that we may wish to review as we discover them at some future date. Furthermore, the list does not yet contain items specific to either the renewal of the C.U.P. now currently under consideration, nor does it deal with a number of ongoing concerns the Coalition has had with the performance of the Planning Division.

The notations, numbers and pages cited refer to the original C.U.P. #5170 on the approval document dated, July 19, 2001.

The full document is attached for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Howard Smith, 
Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks


(copies of the original Ozena C.U.P. as well as all other referenced documents are available electronically upon request from Stop the Trucks.)


STOP THE TRUCKS! COALITION
Ojai, California

Concerns Regarding the Annual & Ongoing Reviews 
of the Ozena Valley Ranch Gravel Mine C.U.P.


January 13, 2009

     On January 7, 2009, representatives of the Ojai "Stop the Trucks" Coalition, including Chair, Michael Shapiro; Vice Chair, Howard Smith; and committee members, Stan Green; and Craig Beam, met with senior Ventura County executives, including County CEO Marty Robinson, Deputy CEO Matt Carroll, and County Counsel, Noel Klebaum. A number of generalized questions, concerns or issues were raised by the Coalition in regards both the annual and ongoing reviews of the Ozena Valley Ranch Gravel Mine C.U.P.

     The Coalition promised a good faith effort to create a more specific list of those concerns with the hope that the County would also make a good faith effort to consider those issues as it undertakes its various reviews and audits of the Ozena permit and renewal.

     What follows below is the Coalition's first attempt to present those concerns as regards to monitoring the original C.U.P. Although the Coalition has attempted to make the list as thorough as possible, it is quite possible that we've overlooked additional issues that we may wish to review as we discover them at some future date. Furthermore, the list does not yet contain items specific to either the renewal of the C.U.P. now currently under consideration, nor does it deal with a number of ongoing concerns the Coalition has had with the performance of the Planning Division.

     The notations, numbers and pages cited refer to the original C.U.P. #5170 on the approval document dated, July 19, 2001.

(1) There's a requirement that prior to any renewal application that the Planning Director must authorize, in writing, that all prior permit conditions have been reviewed and have met conditions set-forth in the original CUP. Our first point of concern, therefore, is whether or not – according to the guidelines in Item #2-b-2 on Page 2 - there was ever the appropriate determination, in writing, by then Planning Director Chris Stephens, prior to July 19, 2006. 

     So far, in the Coalition's review of all the Public Records obtained from the Ozena file, we have found no such written determination and are therefore concerned as to whether such a review was ever undertaken in the first place, or whether or not such a document was ever even written. Indeed, given the extremely high percentages of daily violations of the permit schedule that were found in a two month sampling of data from 2007, one has to wonder if such a review had ever been done prior to the 2006 authorization. If the review had been done, what were the results? And if no review had been done, how was the agency able to determine that the mine operators had been in continuous compliance?


(2) Item 2-c on the same page begins to look at the "Final Reclamation." We note that the Planning Agency should be assessing annually whether or not a current final reclamation plan (and not a proposed Aquaculture solution that may or may not be approved in the future) is in existence; whether or not there is any sort of confirmed financial assurance guarantee; and whether or not such a guarantee had been properly adjusted for possible past inflation, etc., on an annual basis.

Additionally -- has there been an annual survey to determine if the site, as originally approved and/or modified, is still properly staked and marked? Or have the boundaries been improperly modified as has been alleged by several unconfirmed sources?


(3) On Page 3 - item 3-b reiterates the need for proof of insurance; to delineate the boundaries of the excavation pit; and also the concept of "truck trip record keeping" in condition 27. Elsewhere in the permit the maximum number of daily trips, annual trips and the average number of daily trips are delineated. We remain particularly concerned about this last item as there seems to have been no attempt whatsoever by the Planning Division to calculate any of these actual numbers of trips. 

     Given that the Planning Director is required to determine that all conditions have been continuously met prior to granting an extension, how is it possible to then conclude that conditions have been met without an actual count of trips and a review of the weigh tickets? 

     Was there ever any count at all -- either prior to the approval, or since -- that has actually determined either the average or maximum number of total trips for the year?

     Further, how is it possible to establish any of the required Environmental baselines for an adequate EIR review required of any CUP renewal without any documentation of the actual number of truck trips in any one year? 

     It should be noted here that both the original application and the subsequent 2003 modification were accomplished by means of Minimum Negative Declarations (MND's) and that there was never any independent review of the applicant's EIR. Given the well documented inability – in court documents and otherwise - of the Planning Division staff to handle matters even as basic as communicating and enforcing hours of operation, or to read, decipher and properly interpret data obtained from the weigh tickets, how can anyone claim that any planning staff ever conducted either a proper or adequate environmental review that thoroughly and diligently meets all CEQA standards?


(4) Continuing onto Page 4 - Condition 48 requires hazardous Materials Permits; Condition 58 requires Storm water Quality Conditions and Condition 62 requires Annual Financial Assurances for site reclamation. Have all of these permits been reviewed annually for compliance? Have the conditions actually been met? For example, the Coalition read Carol Aragon's recent report that old concrete and road wastes are being stored on site. Has anyone from the planning staff asked why these materials ended up on site? Is the mine illegally processing road waste or dumping it on site? 

     Given that the site may be partially leased to another firm - Alliance Trucking - what knowledge, if any, does the County have that all guarantees, permits and assurances are being met by Alliance? 

     Furthermore, does the storm water run-off plan meet current 2009 State and Federal standards that have quite possibly changed since 2001? Please keep in mind that the Ozena mine sits right in the middle of a flood plain.

(5) Section c, on Page 4 - lists a number of annual requirements, specifically conditions 24 through 65. Is there any documentation that these annual requirements have actually been met? These would have to include all the necessary updating, such as increasing financial assurances to keep pace with inflation; proof of insurance; and annual SMARA reviews. Is there evidence to present that all of these were in fact conducted at the legally mandated time and are now in existence for review?

     Has each and every annual review included reviews of weigh tickets to determine compliance both as to numbers of trips and time compliance? And if so, where is the documentation of those reviews? Further -- given the complete failure of the Head of the Industrial sector to correctly interpret this data in 2007 -- what proof is there that if such reviews and counts were undertaken, that they were handled with even a modicum of competence by the staff assigned to these tasks?

     On Page 4, item 5 requires consultation with other agencies if there have been any modifications to the permit. Given that substantial changes were implemented in the spring of 2008, it is appropriate for us to ask for written proof of all the legally mandated agencies that were consulted and for the written responses from those agencies. Can this verification be forthcoming?


(6) On Page 5, item 7, everyone involved in the operation of this permit must be informed of the permit conditions. What proof exists -- in writing -- that this was ever done? Or, done correctly? For example, since August of 2008, the Stop The Trucks! Coalition has twice requested documentation that would confirm whether or not such notice was ever made. Through another Coalition PRR that same month, we learned that flyers being distributed by Ozena to rock and gravel transport drivers were supposed to be turned-over for review and inspection. Apparently these flyers – which remain in the hands of the Planning Department and referred to regularly in emails – were completely incorrect when listing hours of operation - including driving through the restricted zone in the Ojai Valley. And if the hours of operation were consistently interpreted incorrectly, how is it possible that the Planning Division, at any time in the past, could attest that the operator has been in continuous compliance with the C.U.P.? To date, the Planning Department has yet to turn any of these flyers over as required by law.

(7) In item 8, on the same page, the owner must sign off on any Notice of Land Use Entitlement etc. Was such a document ever filed? Was a new one filed when Alliance took over the lease? 

(8) In item 9, also on Page 5 and 6, all costs for SMARA, etc., are to be charged to the permit holder to insure Condition Compliance for CEQA. How is it then possible for the applicant to turn down a review of their application for a continuance by an outside firm selected by the County, in a bid process, because the Applicant has determined that the cost is too great? CEQA requires an adequate review, not the cheapest review. In fact, CEQA does not allow the applicant to determine costs. How is it that Planning Staff has allowed the applicant and/or the agent representing the applicant to apparently manipulate and/or significantly control the review process? Again, it's clear that CEQA does not allow the applicant or his agent to determine costs, but does require an adequate review and not the least costly one. How is it that Staff has allowed the applicant's opinion regarding costs to apparently control the review process? 

(9) Page 6, item 2 at the top, refers to the annual SMARA inspections. Can the work of the SMARA coordinator be documented beyond a shadow of doubt? Has this compliance work been done regularly, completely and properly each and every year? These are documents the Coalition would like to see and if we have not yet been given access to them via prior PRR, they will be certainly included in future requests. 

(10) Further down on Page 6, item 6, (2), requires a signed reimbursement agreement. Is such an agreement current? And if it is, is the agreement with Ozena or with Alliance? 

(11) Further down on page 6, item c - regarding Monitoring and enforcement costs, see references to County Code 8114-3.4. 

     The county is in the midst of a budget crisis, yet the Planning Director made an arbitrary decision in December of 2007 that Ozena would not be responsible for "past" violations. Her justification was that there was a misunderstanding of the conditions of the permit. Was there in fact a "misunderstanding" or was it staff incompetence and a failure of supervision? Wasn't the mine was allowed to engage in extensive violations – as proven in the two month review as well as having been extensively commented upon in the recently concluded *Virgilo vs. County of Ventura Court Case? Additionally, and also apparently due to this alleged negligence and incompetence of the Planning Division staff -- the Planning Director's actions here may not only have been an abuse of her discretion as noted by the judge on that case, but may have also cost the county – and, ultimately the citizens of this county for whom the Planning Director works -- hundreds of thousands of dollars in potential and/or actual penalties.

     *County government attorneys acknowledged that a number of Planning Division staffers had made numerous errors with regard to improperly understanding, interpreting and enforcing the Ozena CUP, and that "planners have no power to change the terms (of the CUP) approved by the Planning Commission." County lawyers further noted that "staff's misapplication of the Condition passively allowing truck travel during prohibited times does not and cannot effectuate a change to the Condition approved and adopted by the Commission." Additionally, County council went on to argue that "….to the contrary, Planning staff has a ministerial duty to apply and enforce all Truck Travel conditions as they are approved by the Planning Commission." Furthermore, that the County Planning Division has "the clear and present duty" to apply and enforce the Condition as written and approved by the Planning Division and re-adopted in Modification #1."

     Finally – County lawyers made such a good case noting that with regard to both Ozena's apparent CUP violations as well as Planning Division's failure to enforce the CUP guidelines, that Judge Reiser expressed the following in a footnote attached to his findings: "The initial permit allows for a five-year extension if the Planning Director, assuming 'all conditions have been continuously complied with' by petitioners, authorizes such continued use. Since the County has already found permit violations, it might well be an abuse of discretion for the Planning Director to authorize such an extension."

(12) Pages 7 & 8 - items e & f - These require the operator to indemnify the County. Given that the facility has now been leased, have all of these financial indemnities been met at an adequate degree, including any past or future inflation? Is there written proof of such? Has the new operator, Alliance, also satisfactorily participated in such indemnification? 

(13) Section 13 on Page 9 deals with the resolution of complaints. Isn't the Planning Division clearly delinquent here on several levels? For example, there's still an open complaint from February of 2008 filed by the Coalition and Bob Walker of Ojai that was dropped in the middle of processing by the SMARA coordinator and the head of the industrial section.

     And just last week, didn't the Planning Director attempt to invalidate a number of complaints filed in November and December of 2008 without even so much as providing the Coalition with a single weigh ticket to back her claims of Ozena's innocence? And given the fact the Coalition has filed multiple public record requests asking the Planning Division turn over such weigh tickets, shouldn't this latest failure to cooperate also be considered a possible abuse of her discretion?.

  However, the issue of complaint response goes beyond the division's narrow interpretation that complaints are just about trucks. The C.U.P does not differentiate between types of complaints. And while the Stop the Trucks! Coalition has, on numerous occasions, mailed and/or e-mailed complaints about the lack of compliance monitoring -- to date, these complaints have yet to be addressed by the Planning Division. According to CEQA standards, monitoring with regard to compliance must be reasonable and feasible. However, the failure of the Planning Division to take responsibility in assuring that such monitoring takes places with regard to the Ozena rock and gravel mine operation, was amply presented at a meeting of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors as far back as Spring / 2008. It appears as if the Planning Division continues to ignore many of these complaints as if they did not exist. Tragically, they do.

(14) Item 16, also on Page 9, requires that prior to granting of any CUP, the Ozena operation must also be in compliance with all other Federal, State and Local authorities and agencies. Is there any written proof that such consultation has been accomplished by the various agencies in question and Ozena?

Where is the paperwork from SMARA, APCD, Cal water agencies, Fish & Game, etc. that indicates that the mine has meet all conditions for operation?

     And why have trucks coming from the mine been regularly allowed to flaunt requirements that their loads be covered to protect other drivers, etc., on the highways? Even one of the Ojai City Council members has been among the many citizens whose windshield has been smashed by rock and gravel falling off uncovered loads. Did any compliance monitoring even assess something as basic as this?

(15) Item 19 on Page 10 allows the county to request aerial photographs to determine whether the mine's boundaries, etc. have been altered or modified. Do these exist? Have any aerial photos ever been taken? And if they have, when were they taken and how many exist? And if they exist, where are these photos? 

(16) Item 23 on Page 11 - regarding changes of ownership of lessee also appears to have been violated. Our PRR in August of 2008 did not turn up any such required documents, i.e., such as any ten-day notice prior to any change of operators together with a letter acknowledging that the new operator will comply with all conditions of the existing CUP. Either the Planning Division failed to turn over these documents or such documents do not exist. In either case, someone is at fault here. And if it is the latter, then once again could not the Planning Director rightfully be accused of exceeding her discretion in allowing such a lapse of regulations to take place?

(17) Item 24 follows right on the heels of the above in requiring Insurance: Has the operator and/or lessee provided the necessary proof of insurance that is fully up-to-date and covers for inflation, etc., or has this also been neglected an/or ignored?

(18) Item 25 - The days and hours of operation brings us to one of the greater points of contention, with the first being the issue of hours: When has the division demonstrated any ability under CEQA requirements to monitor hours, especially of truck traffic? 


     There exists a well documented public record that indicates that staff has never known or understood the C.U.P. requirements; that they have in fact publicly mis-stated the requirements; that they either don't know or understand how to apply the only tools – weigh tickets – that may be used to determine compliance or prove non-compliance. Indeed - aren't these tools fundamental to the job requirements of a Planning staffer or supervisors? If Planning staff and supervisors can't correctly handle some of the basic functions of their job and use some of the basic tools at their disposal, how can they be trusted with responsibilities of making decisions which may impact the health, welfare and safety of an entire County? 

     Following the question of hours there appears to be yet a new twist on the English language as evidenced by the Planning Director's January 2009 letter. This letter was also accompanied by what appears to be a "revisionist" map sent to the Coalition. The Planning Director contradicts prior wording used by Planning staff and administrators in their 2003 C.U.P. modification approval letter, and, in doing so, provide additional evidence of a possible abuse of discretion.

   The Planning Director created a new map on November 17, 2008, indicating her determination of what constituted the restricted zone along Route 33 in the Ojai Valley. Her statement accompanying the "Day and Hours of Operation" Chart in condition 25, and reads as follows: "Trucks Traveling on Highway 33 between Casitas Spring and City of Ojai." Astonishingly, are we to believe that the Planning Director actually believes the word "between" allows her to exclude both Casitas Springs and the City of Ojai from the restricted zone? 

     Such an interpretation would mean, for example, that the American Civil War -- also known as "The War between the States" -- did not actually involve any states, just the people standing on the Mason-Dixon line! Or that a Conditional Use Permit "between" the County of Ventura and the Ozena Valley Ranch does not actually involve either party, just the space "between" them. 

     The current interpretation by the Planning Director eight years after the approval of the C.U.P. as to the actual area of restricted truck transport travel is unacceptable. When one adds to the above "interpretation" the additional documentation that Ozena and their agent have been consistently and forcefully demanding a need for additional hours; Ozena's demands for a stay of the 12/07 ruling on hours; and Ozena's filing suit against the County (and losing) to overturn these conditions; and finally – factoring-in a Planning Division that has avoided any pro-active attempts at monitoring despite numerous red flags, then what do we end up with? Are we to believe that we have a Planning Director who appears to be going out of her way to appear predisposed to insuring that no violations be recorded against Ozena that will in any way impact their current or proposed new C.U.P. request? Shouldn't such blatant and obvious bias in favor of an applicant and against the public interest, be considered patently outrageous and thoroughly unacceptable? Should this be tolerated by any public, tax-payer funded agency?

(19) Again, right on the heels of the chart in item 25, we have items 26 & 27 - regarding the number of truck trips and record keeping. Has the Planning Division ever made annual and daily counts of truck volume? Where is the documentation of these truck trips? And if the department has such records on hand for any portion of 2008, why have they still not been turned over to the Coalition as part of our August or December PRR's? 

(20) Item 29 on Page 12 refers to the staking of permit boundaries. Have these actually been checked each year? Has mapping been undertaken to insure compliance? We understand - again through unconfirmed sources - that these markers may have been moved or possibly removed altogether. And if so, how would the county know?

(21) We have already noted the requirement in item 30 on the next page about the covering of trucks, etc. -- an area of concern that seems to have been completely neglected in eight years of operation.

(22) Occasionally, trucks with excessive king pins have been spotted going up Route 33. What abilities has the County demonstrated under CEQA to insure that oversized vehicles are not traveling up this dangerous road? 

(23) Item 37 on Page 14 requires annual SMARA compliance and documentation. Has this ever been done? 

(24) Item 41 on the same page reiterates the need to obey state vehicle codes to avoid spillage, etc. Again, what documented steps has the county taken to insure compliance?

(25) Now that there is a new lessee on site, what assurances relative to item 58 on Page 17 have been made, met, or documented? 

(26) Item 60 deals with road maintenance fees. If the department has not monitored the actual number of trucks, how can the department determine whether or not they have been short changed in fees? Have fees been properly calculated and documented? 

(27) Section f, 62 – 65: SMARA related conditions beginning on Page 17 deals with a number of critical issues, such as annual financial assurances for reclamation. Have these been met – or is the Division simply allowing Ozena to skate on this one until their Aquaculture proposal is passed? 

     - Is there genuine, official documentation of financial security in place? Or, if the new proposals are defeated, will the public be stuck with the costs of reclamation? 

     - Have all the conditions of SMARA been met annually? 

     - Has the surety been adjusted annually to match current reclamation costs? This requires the actual determination of current costs along with a needs assessment. The bond protects the public. 

     - Has there been an independent review to determine the value and cost of such a guarantee? 

     - Have all of these conditions been met and documented on an annual basis, including maps?

- end -

 

 

More Complaints about the Trucks and their supposed Regulators

Dear Kim Rodriguez & Carole Aragon,

     That you for your response last Thursday to several of our earlier complaints, however there were some fairly critical ones which have not been addressed. They are being re-stated here individually.

Please add these to our list of formal complaints below.

#23: On 12/31/08, "Stop the Trucks," informed you that we had already file three Public Record Requests (2 in August of 2008 and one in December of 2008) for all the weigh tickets from Ozena in order to confirm potential violations or to clear the mine of those allegations. These weigh tickets are also critical to establish base lines for any environmental impact review and to determine average daily and maximum daily trips. Without that information there is no way a reasonable EIR review can even be undertaken. We have received nothing to date.

#24: On 12/19/08 "Stop the Trucks," informed you that we recently learned that three environmental firms (URS; Lilburn; & Envicom) have responded to an apparent RFP prepared by the department last July according to your own billing records. 

     First, the Planning Division failed to included these documents in our Public Records Request of August, a clear violation in and of itself. 

     Secondly, the RFP was prepared prior to the public scoping process. Normally under CEQA, the public scoping to determine what should be in the RFP occurs BEFORE an agency sends out an RFP. 

     Third, and perhaps most critically, we have also learned from our last PRR that the three firms (URS; Lilburn; & Envicom) that responded to the RFP were not only either recommended by the agent for the applicant, John Hecht, but have also had significant contact with the applicant that was in fact encouraged by Pat Richards. 

     Fourth, URS had already responded to an "sole source" RFP on Ozena last spring, which was rejected by Mr. Hecht as being too expensive. Hecht wanted competitive bidding to lower the price of the RFP while also adding in a second proposal for Aqua-culture for one price. That the applicant gets to determine the size and scope of an EIR review based on cost instead of what is necessary and appropriate runs contrary to CEQA guidelines. 

     We have sent to County Counsel and Matt Carroll several recent documents from Fresno County that indicate that West Coast Environmental & Engineering and the Lilburn Corporation possibly worked side by side as co-consultants on a large project for Vulcan Materials. This project may still be ongoing.

     There may or may not be anything inappropriate about Lilburn submitting a bid under these circumstances. As lay people this is not something we can judge. 

     Do you, however, think that in the public's perception of these matters, it might not appear to be a bit too cozy a relationship when companies that have worked together are then called upon to evaluate each other? 

     A further point... It is our understanding that URS, which apparently re-bid the Ozena C.U.P. work at a lower price after the sole source was rejected, was the same firm that Santa Barbara County used to evaluate Troesh's Diamond Rock proposals. The work for Troesh was done by West Coast Environmental & Engineering, supposedly putting them on opposite sides of this case. 

     However, during the entire six year course of the work on the Diamond Rock proposal, no one, for example, notified District Seven of Caltrans that a significant portion of the proposed truck traffic was to cross out of Santa Barbara County on Route 33 and come through the Los Padres Forest and Ojai. District Seven was stunned to learn of this project, which they did from us, especially since it was too late to have any impact on the proposals. (We have these emails, which are available to you as well.) 

     Nowhere in the EIR work ups by West Coast or in the reviews by URS was any real consideration given to the impacts of this project on the Ojai Valley; on our air quality or air shed; on traffic impacts; or on impacts to the road bed of Route 33 through the Los Padres Forest which did eventually collapse; etc.

     The Diamond Rock proposal was finally amended after a year of extensive legal battles with Stop the Trucks to essentially void traffic coming south into Ventura County.

     Given these significant oversights - and despite URS' reputation as a world-wide environmental firm - wouldn't there be reason to question the validity of using this firm to evaluate a project where the parameters are nearly identical to the ones that they may have failed to notice in their prior review? 

     And what would an already skeptical Ojai populace or the citizens of Ventura County think if this were the type of firm chosen to once more review the work of West Coast Environmental and Engineering? How could we be assured that they'd catch every possible mistake and oversight?

     And lastly, a question about Envicom. They have frequently worked for the City of San Buenaventura, where John Hecht, principal of West Coast Environmental & Engineering and the agent for Ozena, has been a long standing member of the Planning Commission. What assurances can the public be given to avoid even the perception that Envicom's possible work on the Ozena C.U.P. is not some sort of Quid Pro Quo?

#25 On 12/19/08 "Stop the Trucks," informed you that after a nearly 2-1/2 year delay, Mr. Richards finally responded to a letter from the Ojai Valley MAC regarding several key issues related to the Ozena proposals. The MAC had , expressed serious concerns regarding Ozena, including ground water standards; seismic damage to the roads, especially Route 33; and the concepts of average daily trips and maximum daily trips. Although in his response Mr. Richards assures the MAC that all of these concerns have been taken care of, he in fact ignores the actual reality. 

     Application, for instance of the Ventura County ground water standards could in itself cause the termination of the Ozena mine. The low cost bid for the RFP further ignores the fact that Highway 33 DID collapse this year and that no seismic review is indicated in the RFP's nor are their sufficient funds to even begin to accomplish this task. 

     Furthermore, the concept of average daily trips and maximum daily trips also violates CEQA standards because the Planning Division has absolutely no means to measure either of these numbers nor any ability to determine what the "baseline" is for CEQA impacts. . The only possible tool the Division might have is weigh tickets, which it has assiduously avoided obtaining for the first nine months of the year.

     All of these actions are highly inappropriate and only add to the list of "theater of the absurd" practices that Mr. Richards and the Planning Division have engaged in over the eight years of the Ozena C.U.P. 

#26: On 12/10/08 "Stop the Trucks," informed you that two independent sources familiar with the gravel industry have reported that the alleged new operator, Alliance had possibly moved and expanded the processing plant; had expanded the size and location of the pit; and were allegedly washing and processing old concrete. If true, all would be potential C.U.P. violations.

     Further, at an October Ojai City Council meeting, the lawyer for Tony Virgilio and Ozena presented the City with a weigh ticket purportedly from October 8th, two months after the Virgilio family had allegedly leased the operation to Alliance. 

     That Virgilio had weigh tickets in his possession for that date leads us to wonder if in fact the Virgilio Family has both leased the operation to Alliance while continuing to fill orders separately as some means to appear to be in compliance while not actually being so. In other words, is he double dipping?

#27: On 12/3/08 "Stop the Trucks," informed you that it was almost one year since you informed the operators of the Ozena Valley Ranch and Gravel Mine in writing that they must comply with the hours of the existing C.U.P. 

Last month the lawyers for "Stop the Trucks" had reported to Ventura County Counsel that as of August 4, 2008 the Virgilio Family had apparently been leasing their mining operation to Alliance, a gravel and trucking firm from up north. In our last public records request there was no indication that Alliance had agreed in writing as required by the C.U.P. to obey all conditions of the permit. 

#28: On February 13, 2008 "Stop the Trucks," and Bob Walker of Ojai filed a complaint about gravel trucking incidents on February 8, 2008, that no one in the Planning Division ever responded to, despite the fact that Carole Aragon did launch an investigation. While you were on leave last February, Mr. Richards was overseeing Ms. Aragon. A copy of that complaint is below at the very bottom of this email. 

     According to documents that the "Stop the Trucks" Coalition obtained through our August 2008 Public Records Request, Ms. Aragon began her investigation but never completed it. To date, no one has ever responded to Mr. Walker about the issues he's raised. (And this isn't the first time a complaint from Mr. Walker regarding Ozena has gone unanswered and perhaps un-investigated.) Further, even though Ms. Aragon, in a letter to John Hecht, Ozena's agent, refers to a number of weigh tickets that she is reviewing, none of those weigh tickets were turned over to the Coalition in the course of our Public Records Request.

     Given these two issues, failure to fully investigate and failure to turn over documents under the Public Records Act, and Mr. Richards own record in regards Ozena, I hope you can understand our concern that our complaints are not only taken seriously but are adjudicated fully and properly. 

#29: On April 8, 2008 "Stop the Trucks," representatives made a presentation before you, Chris Stephens and the Board of Supervisors on the failure of the Planning Division to have adequate reasonable and feasible mentoring of truck traffic coming out of the Ozena mine. The Board of Supervisors instructed the RMA to come up with reasonable monitor measures. Copies of our testimony are attached. To this date however, the Planning Division and RMA have apparently done nothing to insure compliance.

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks

 

 

Complaints about gravel trucks continue to pile up...

Dear Kim and Carole,

Please add these latest three incidents below to our list of formal complaints.

#22: On January 16, 2009 around 2:19 pm another UNCOVERED but fully loaded double hopper gravel truck heading south on Route 33 was tracked in the restricted zone. If this vehicle had been coming from Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation, particularly since it was - as always - traveling with an uncovered load in the middle of a Santa Ana dust storm. Dirt was clearly blowing off of the truck. 

Earlier that same day, a blue double hopper gravel truck heading north up Route 33 passed through the Ojai Valley starting around 7:19 am and was tracked traveling through the restricted zone. 

A third double hopper heading north up Route 33 entered the restricted zone and passed through the Ojai Valley beginning around 7:51 am. If either of these vehicles had been going to Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation?

Sincerely,


Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks


Dear Kim and Carole,

Please add this latest incident below to our list of formal complaints.

#21: On January 15, 2009 around 7:42 pm two double hopper gravel trucks heading north on Route 33 were tracked entering the restricted zone and continuing north towards the mines. If this vehicle had been heading to Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation?
Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks

Dear Kim and Carole,

Please add these latest two incidents below to our list of formal complaints as they are almost identical repeats from yesterday.

#20: On January 114, 2009 around 3:12 pm another UNCOVERED but fully loaded Swader double hopper gravel truck heading south on Route 33 was tracked traveling the entire length of the restricted zone until about 3:37 pm . If this vehicle had been coming from Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation, particularly since it was - as always - traveling with an uncovered load?

Later this same day, a white double hopper gravel truck heading north up Route 33 passed through the Ojai Valley between 5:10 pm and 5:42 pm. It looked like the same vehicle spotted the two days prior at around the same time. If this vehicle had been going to Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation?

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks


Dear Kim and Carole,

Please add these latest two incidents below to our list of formal complaints.

#19: On January 13., 2009 around 2:20 pm another UNCOVERED but fully loaded Swader double hopper gravel truck heading south on Route 33 was spotted in Miramonte. If this vehicle had been coming from Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation, particularly since it was - as always - traveling with an uncovered load?

Later this same day, a white double hopper gravel truck heading north up Route 33 passed through the Ojai Valley between 5:00 pm and 5:23 pm. It looked like the same vehicle spotted yesterday at around the same time. If this vehicle had been going to Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation?

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks


Dear Kim and Carole,

Please add this latest incident below to our list of formal complaints.

#18: On January 12, 2009, a white double hopper gravel truck heading north up Route 33 passed through the Ojai Valley between 5:00 pm and 5:30 pm. It looked like the vehicle in the picture below (taken earlier). If this vehicle had been going to Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation?

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks


Dear Kim and Carole,

Thank you for your latest follow up.

Please add these latest incidents below to our list of formal complaints.

#17: Once again, on January 12, 2009, a fully loaded Swader double hopper gravel truck heading south down Route 33 passed through the Ojai Valley between 2:15 pm and 2:45 pm. While the truck did not violate the time schedule, it was UNCOVERED. 

A little later that same afternoon, between 2:42 pm and 3:12 pm another UNCOVERED but fully loaded Swader double hopper gravel truck heading south, entered the restricted zone, went past the high school, turned right at the "Y"," and then continued down Rt 33 towards Ojai View and Casitas Springs. If this vehicle had been coming from Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation, particularly since it was - as always - traveling during the restricted time zone and with an uncovered load?

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks



Mr. Smith:
Attached please find copies of the Alleged Notice of Violation letters to Ozena Valley Ranch Mine for Complaint No. 14 and No. 15. If you have any questions, please let me know.

Regards,
Carole Aragon
SMARA Coordinator
County of Ventura - Planning Division
carole.aragon@ventura.org 
(805) 654-2462




Dear Kim and Carole,

We look forward to seeing the responses to our prior complaints. Thank you. 

Please add these latest incidents below to our list of formal complaints.

#16: Once again, on January 8, 2009, a Swader double hopper gravel truck came north up 33 and entered the restricted zone in Casitas Springs at about 7:32 am then continued north towards town and then past the high school. (This would put it on the same daily schedule as the vehicle complaints #13 & #14.) If this vehicle had been going to Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation?

That same afternoon, at about 3:55 pm a UNCOVERED but fully loaded Swader double hopper gravel truck heading south, entered the restricted zone, went past the high school, turned right at the "Y"," and then continued down Rt 33 towards Ojai View and Casitas Springs. If this vehicle had been coming from Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation, particularly since it was - as always - traveling with an uncovered load?

Following upon our conversation with the County CEO and County Counsel, the Stop the Trucks Coalition has also been in touch with Ojai City Council Staff and the State Assembly regarding enforcement of this rule about covering loads. Local and State Police have now been alerted and may well begin citing gravel hauling vehicles that fail to protect the public by covering their loads.

On top of our unconfirmed reports regarding possible weigh scale irregularities at the mine, we have also see online research at the State of California's site that indicates that Tony Virgilio's weighmaster certification might still be delinquent. Would this disqualify him from serving as a weigh master?

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks



Dear Kim and Carole,

Thank you once more for your prompt response to our last two complaints. 

Please add these latest incidents below to our list of formal complaints.

#14: On January 7, 2009, a Swader double hopper gravel truck came north up 33 and entered the restricted zone in Casitas Springs at about 7:38 am then continued north towards town and then past the high school. (This would put it on the same daily schedule as the vehicle in complaint #13.) If this vehicle had been going to Ozena, would that not constitute yet another potential violation?

#15: According to the C.U.P, all trucks loaded and leaving Ozena are required to have their loads covered, however, as best we have been able to determine over the past two years, none of the trucks that we have witnessed as possibly coming from Ozena with loads, appeared to be covered. If this is in fact proven to be true, then wouldn't this also constitute a pattern of repeated violations? 

We are also have also heard multiple -- but unconfirmed reports -- that Ozena may not actually be using the automated truck scale weighing system for each weigh ticket and might possibly be avoiding this system by writing out many tickets by hand. And the rumors are that these tickets do not have either the actual real weight or the correct time. We don't know if this is true or not, but isn't this something that can be easily confirmed by comparing weigh tickets and billing records as was done last year? We raised this question at our meeting this afternoon with the County CEO and County Counsel and hope you can eventually provide some clear cut answers.


Thank you,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks


Dear Mr. Smith:
In response to your complaint #12 and #13 against Ozena Valley Ranch Mine, I am forwarding you copies of the Alleged Notice of Violation (ANOV09-0006 and 0007) that were issued to Ozena requesting the weigh tickets for the days in questions. If you have any questions, please let me know.

Regards


Carole Aragon
SMARA Coordinator
County of Ventura - Planning Division
carole.aragon@ventura.org
(805) 654-2462



Dear Kim and Carole,

Thank you for your earlier responses and for noting yet another possible violation by Ozena, that of having used concrete and other reprocessed scrap on site. 
Please add these latest incidents below to our list of formal complaints.

#12: On January 2, 2009, a white double hopper gravel truck came south down Route 33 and into the Ojai restricted zone at 3:23 pm. If this vehicle had been coming from Ozena, that would constitute yet another potential violation.

#13: Today, January 6, 2009, a white double hopper gravel truck with a white cab with brown trim came south down Route 33 into the Ojai restricted zone, past the high school and hospital and then turned left at the "y" and headed through downtown Ojai at 7:53 am. Five minutes later, a Swader double hopper came north up 33 and then drove past the high school at 7:58 am. 

Later that same day, a Swader double hopper gravel truck entered the Ojai restricted zone heading south on Route 33 at 3:08 pm and continued south all the way through Casitas Springs.

If these trucks were coming from Ozena, these too would constitute violations.

We are also wondering why, since Ozena is required by the C.U.P. to maintain copies of all weigh tickets on site, the Planning Division did not simply obtain the weight tickets for these incidents (and for the entire year) while Ms. Aragon was up at the mine site in December, rather than making multiple requests by snail mail?

Thank you,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks




Good Afternoon Howard~

I wanted to let you know that our review of the complaints that you filed are expected to be completed by the end of the week. I will send you a formal written response of our findings at that time.

I would also like to set up a meeting where we can discuss issues such as baseline (that you discussed below) the scoping meeting to be held in Ojai and the EIR consultant selection process. Any specific dates/times that would work for you? The earlier the better~

I look forward to our meeting.

Kim 

Kim Rodriguez, AICP
Planning Director
County of Ventura
805.654.2481
kim.rodriguez@ventura.org




Dear Kim Rodriguez & Carole Aragon,

#11 There appears to be no let up in possible violations by gravel trucks going to and from Ozena. On Tuesday, December 30, 2008 beginning at around 4:25 pm one of our Coalition members spotted a light blue double hopper gravel truck, possibly one from Swader, passing through the "Y" at Ojai and heading north on Route 33. The truck continued north past the high school and hospital. The spotter trailed the truck for a considerable length of time as it proceeded up Maricopa Highway and towards Ozena.

If correct this would represent another in a possible series of ongoing violations. 

To date, "Stop the Trucks," has twice filed Public Record Requests for all the weigh tickets from Ozena in order to confirm potential violations or to clear the mine of those allegations. These weigh tickets are also critical to establish base lines for any environmental impact review and to determine average daily and maximum daily trips. Without that information there is no way a reasonable EIR review can even be undertaken. We have received nothing to date.

As was noted in a separate letter to you this week about meeting, the consensus of the Executive committee was a strong, "yes." 

We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss how your office intends to respond to our ever growing list of complaints, as well as anything else you wish to discuss. 

Sincerely,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks




Dear Kim Rodriguez & Carole Aragon,

I hope you are both enjoying your holidays and am glad to see you are both checking emails as it appears there has been no let up in gravel trucks. 

Today, Friday, the day after Christmas, two double hopper gravel trucks came south on Route 33 and past by the Ojai Hospital and Nordhoff High School at 3:45 pm. If they were coming from Ozena, that would be yet another violation of the C.U.P. At least one, if not both were from Swader Trucking. We are asking you once again to investigate this possible violation of the Ozena C.U.P.

It is now over one month since we first began reporting possible C.U.P. violations on a semi-regular basis and we have still heard nothing back from the Planning Division regarding the results of your investigations.

We have also queried the executive committee about the possibility of meeting with you but due to the holidays have not yet been able to determine when that might be. 

Sincerely,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks



Dear Mr. Smith,

We are currently in the investigation process of your prior four e-mails. I'll ask Carole to open up an Alleged Notice of Violation on for the 18th. I expect to have a response to you shortly. 

As to the issue of the RFP, it was sent to many firms and we had three responses. The firm will be chosen prior to the scoping meeting so that they will have the benefit of attending. As we discussed earlier, the scooping meeting will be held in Ojai. I'll ask staff to review the issue of this document not being included your public records act request as it is a part of the record

I believe it is important that we meet to discuss the other items that you brought forward in your e-mail. If possible, during the first week in January. Please let me know if you or a representative from Stop the Trucks will be available. I'll be out of the office until the 5th of January but I'll be checking my messages.

Sincerely, 

Kim 


Kim Rodriguez, AICP
Planning Director
County of Ventura
805.654.2481
kim.rodriguez@ventura.org





Dear Kim Rodriguez and Carol Aragon,

#7)   It appears that the enforcement work of the prior weeks with Ozena has been to little avail. This morning, December 18, 2008, and only hours after Route 33 was cleared of snow and re-opened to traffic, a dark blue, double hopper truck from Pride Trucking passed by Nordhoff High School just as students were arriving heading north at 7:37 am, in apparent violation of the allowed hours of travel through the Ojai Valley.

#8)   The Stop the Trucks Coalition has recently learned that three environmental firms (URS; Lilburn; & Envicom) have responded to an apparent RFP prepared by the department last July according to your own billing records. 

First, the Planning Division failed to included these documents in our Public Records Request of August, a clear violation in and of itself. 

Secondly, the RFP was prepared prior to the public scoping process. Normally under CEQA, the public scoping to determine what should be in the RFP occurs BEFORE an agency sends out an RFP. 

Third, and perhaps most critically, we have also learned from our last PRR that the three firms (URS; Lilburn; & Envicom) that responded to the RFP were not only either recommended by the agent for the applicant, John Hecht, but have also had significant contact with the applicant that was in fact encouraged by Pat Richards. 

Fourth, URS had already responded to an "sole source" RFP on Ozena last spring, which was rejected by Mr. Hecht as being too expensive. Hecht wanted competitive bidding to lower the price of the RFP while also adding in a second proposal for Aqua-culture for one price. That the applicant gets to determine the size and scope of an EIR review based on cost instead of what is necessary and appropriate runs contrary to CEQA guidelines. 

Documentation of all of this is openly available in your own files.

#9)   After a nearly 2-1/2 year delay, Mr. Richards finally responded to a letter from the Ojai Valley MAC regarding several key issues related to the Ozena proposals. The MAC had , expressed serious concerns regarding Ozena, including ground water standards; seismic damage to the roads, especially Route 33; and the concepts of average daily trips and maximum daily trips. Although in his response Mr. Richards assures the MAC that all of these concerns have been taken care of, he in fact ignores the actual reality. 

Application, for instance of the Ventura County ground water standards could in itself cause the termination of the Ozena mine. The low cost bid for the RFP further ignores the fact that Highway 33 DID collapse this year and that no seismic review is indicated in the RFP's nor are their sufficient funds to even begin to accomplish this task. 

Furthermore, the concept of average daily trips and maximum daily trips also violates CEQA standards because the Planning Division has absolutely no means to measure either of these numbers nor any ability to determine what the "baseline" is for CEQA impacts. . The only possible tool the Division might have is weigh tickets, which it has assiduously avoided obtaining for the first nine months of the year.

All of these actions are highly inappropriate and only add to the list of "theater of the absurd" practices that Mr. Richards and the Planning Division have engaged in over the eight years of the Ozena C.U.P. These are among the many, many issues the Coalition will be bringing to the attention of County executives and County Counsel when we meet in early January.

Is it too much to ask that you clean them up by then?

And for Carole Aragon's benefit, a copies of all the other recent complaints, including Bob Walker's from last February follow below.

Sincerely,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks



Dear Kim Rodriguez,

This was perhaps the first morning in many months that none of our Coalition truck spotters were awakened by the sound of gravel trucks at 4:30 am. Perhaps your investigations are beginning to have an impact. Thank you...

And thank you for you note - copied below - in which you inform us that Carole Aragon, the SMARA Coordinator, will be investigating our six (6) recent complaints. (also below)

I do not know if you are aware of it or not, but while you were on leave last February and Mr. Richards was overseeing Ms. Aragon, a complaint was filed about Ozena by an affiliate of the Coalition, Bob Walker. This complaint was never fully investigated or responded to in any form. A copy of that complaint is below at the very bottom of this email. 

According to documents that the "Stop the Trucks" Coalition obtained through our August 2008 Public Records Request, Ms. Aragon began her investigation but never completed it. To date, no one has ever responded to Mr. Walker about the issues he's raised. (And this isn't the first time a complaint from Mr. Walker regarding Ozena has gone unanswered and perhaps un-investigated.) Further, even though Ms. Aragon, in a letter to John Hecht, Ozena's agent, refers to a number of weigh tickets that she is reviewing, none of those weigh tickets were turned over to the Coalition in the course of our Public Records Request.

Given these two issues, failure to fully investigate and failure to turn over documents under the Public Records Act, and Mr. Richards own record in regards Ozena, I hope you can understand our concern that our complaints are not only taken seriously but are adjudicated fully and properly. 

As weigh tickets are the only CEQA tool the Planning Division currently has to ascertain compliance with the C.U.P., we trust you will take the necessary administrative steps to rectify these oversights.

With sincere thanks,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks



Re: Thanks & More Complaints (5) & (6) about Ozena, December 10,2008
From: Kim Rodriguez <Kim.Rodriguez@ventura.org>
To: Howard Smith <smythe@ojai.net>
cc: Carole Aragon <Carole.Aragon@ventura.org>

I received your complaint. Ms Aragon from our office reviews these complaints. I see that you forwarded this to her also so she will be getting back with you. Please call me directly if you have any questions on the process~

Kim





Dear Kim Rodriguez,

Thank you for your response to our prior complaints. Unfortunately we have two more to add.

#5:  This morning at about 4:40 am a double hopper truck apparently passed by the hospital & high school heading north toward Ozena well before allowable hours. Later that same morning what appeared to be the same vehicle, a light blue truck from Swader heading south left the restricted zone near Casitas Springs at about 7:10 am. 

This afternoon, at precisely 3:24pm two more double hopper, both white in color, came south from Ozena and again passed by the high school and hospital. If correct, all of these would have be potential violations.

#6:  Two independent sources familiar with the gravel industry have reported that the alleged new operator, Alliance had possibly moved and expanded the processing plant; had expanded the size and location of the pit; and were allegedly washing and processing old concrete. If true, all would be potential C.U.P. violations.

Further, at an October Ojai City Council meeting, the lawyer for Tony Virgilio and Ozena presented the City with a weigh ticket purportedly from October 8th, two months after the Virgilio family had allegedly leased the operation to Alliance. 

That Virgilio had weigh tickets in his possession for that date leads us to wonder if in fact the Virgilo Family has both leased the operation to Alliance while continuing to fill orders separately as some means to appear to be in compliance while not actually being so. In other words, is he double dipping?

We appreciate your efforts in investigating these matters.

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
"Stop the Trucks"



Complaint (#4) on Gravel Trucks Violating the C.U.P. on Tuesday, December 9, 2008


Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Dear Kim Rodriguez & Chris Stephens,

On Tuesday, December 9, 2008, between 8:22 am and 8:25 am we spotted three double hopper gravel trucks apparently violating the Ozena C.U.P. by heading north on Route 33 in the Ojai Valley restricted zone. 

That same afternoon we spotted three more double hopper trucks, two of which were from Swader, apparently violating the C.U.P. by traveling south bound through the Ojai restricted zone between 3:21 pm and 3:50 pm, which would, once again, put them right in front of Nordhoff High School as students are leaving for the day.

Your department's attention to this urgent matter is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Howard Smith



From: Kim Rodriguez 
To: Howard Smith 
Cc: Carole Aragon ; Chris Stephens ; Patrick Richards 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: Another Complaint (#3) on Gravel Trucks Violating the C.U.P. on Monday, December 8, 2008


Good Morning Mr. Smith - 

We have received your complaint and will follow up. We will keep you posted on our findings.

Kim Rodriguez, AICP
Planning Director
County of Ventura
805.654.2481
kim.rodriguez@ventura.org



Complaint (#3) on Gravel Trucks Violating the C.U.P. on Monday, December 8, 2008

Monday, December 8, 2008

Dear Kim Rodriguez & Chris Stephens,

On Monday, December 8, 2008 I spotted two more Swader double hopper gravel trucks apparently violating the C.U.P. by traveling south bound through the Ojai restricted zone at 3:33 pm and at 3:38 pm, which would again put them right in front of Nordhoff High School as students are leaving for the day.

Your department's attention to this urgent matter is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Howard Smith



Complaint (#2) on Gravel Trucks Violating the C.U.P. on Wednesday, December 3, 2008

From: Smith, Howard 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 8:37 AM
Subject: More Gravel Truck C.U.P. Violations on December 3, 2008

Dear Kim Rodriguez & Chris Stephens,

Thank you for your response to our earlier complaint. We appreciate your quick action.

Please add this to our prior complaint about C.U.P. Violations in conjunction with gravel tucking and the Ozena mine operation.

Today, December 3, 2008, a double hopper truck went north up Maricopa Highway (Route 33) past the high school and hospital towards Ozena at 4:40 am, well before the 6:00 am to 7:00 am allowable access through the Ojai Valley. 

At 7:10 am another double hopper, this one from Swader trucking (apparently one of the most regular possible violators) also went past the high school heading north as students were arriving.

At 7:18 am, a third double hopper - possible another one from Swader - also headed north.

About ten minutes later, at 7:30 am, a fourth truck was spotted doing the same. The last two trucks were the same color as the Swader trucks but their logos were hard to identify at the speed they were traveling.

It is almost one year since you informed the operators of the Ozena Valley Ranch and Gravel Mine in writing that they must comply with the hours of the existing C.U.P. 

When I met with Matt Carroll in July of 2008, I noted that violations of the time schedule were still occurring on essentially a daily basis. Many of us have not only witnessed these violations but have filmed some as well.

These apparent ongoing violations were confirmed recently by the spouse of a former Planning Department employee who during a four day stay at the Ojai Valley Community Hospital, was repeatedly awoken as early as 4:00 am each day by gravel trucks accelerating as they headed north out of the traffic light at the"Y" and past the hospital and/or when coming south, braking at the same intersection.

Last month the lawyers for "Stop the Trucks" had reported to Ventura County Counsel that as of August 4, 2008 the Virgilio Family had apparently been leasing their mining operation to Alliance, a gravel and trucking firm from up north. In our last public records request there was no indication that Alliance had agreed in writing as required by the C.U.P. to obey all conditions of the permit.

Wouldn't it make sense given all that has transpired to require Ozena and Alliance to turn over all of their weigh tickets for the last 12 months to confirm compliance? And if not for the last 12 months, certainly as of August 4th? Doesn't this makes far more sense than doing it piecemeal?

 

 

Tired of having your windshield smashed by loose rocks flying off a double hopper gravel truck?

So are we!     

     The Conditional Use Permit for the Ozena mine requires that all gravel trucks be covered but no one that we've spoken to in the Ojai Valley has ever remembered seeing a covered gravel truck... Ever!     

     We've all heard complaints from many of our friends and neighbors about damage to their vehicles because of loose gravel. 


     After a very positive meeting with the County CEO and County Counsel on issues related to gravel trucking, the Coalition contacted City and State officials to ask for greater enforcement of this rule. We expect both the CHP and local police to initiate inspections and citations shortly.
     In the meantime, we'd like to hear from all of you.

     If you have ever had your vehicle damaged by flying gravel, or if you have ever witnessed a loaded gravel truck traveling through our valley without a proper covering, please email us at the address below. Include as much information as you have, including dates, times, location, type of truck, etc. The more specific you can be, the better, but even if you only have fragmentary information, we would appreciate hearing from you.

     The more the people of Ojai join together and stand up for their rights to protection under the law, the safer and happier we will all be. Send your emails to:     OjaiStopTheTrucks@gmail.com

 

Ojai Valley News, Thursday, December 25, 2008

Long Road Ahead In Gravel Truck Fight


Violations continue to be reported, despite restrictions.


By Linda Harmon


    Even after a Ventura County court upheld C.U.P. restrictions for the Ozena gravel mines for both north- and south-bound traffic, and re-affirmed the county's power to apply them, the gravel trucks keep on rolling. And Stop the Trucks Coalition says it must keep on fighting.

     "We intend to keep protecting the valley from these interests that would violate their conditional use permits and send more trucks rumbling through our valley," said Howard Smith, vice chairman of Stop the Trucks.

     Stop the Trucks has been actively documenting violations in hopes of either getting county officials to strictly enforce existing governmental controls, or revoke the offending mine's C.U.P. entirely. At its Oct. 14 meeting, the city of Ojai joined the effort and committed to backing the nonprofit organization with needed funds.
According to Smith, there have been numerous recent violations by gravel trucks traveling along the Highway 33 corridor during forbidden hours. The mine's C.U.P. allows gravel trucks to travel only between 6 to 7 a.m. and from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on weekdays.

     The group has been in contact with Kim Rodriguez, Ventura County Planning director, and her superiors, requesting all weight tickets from Ozena between Dec. 1, 2007 and Aug. 12, 2008, to gain more evidence of non-compliance and force the withdrawal of Ozena's C.U.P., which would halt its operations.

     "It appears that the enforcement work of the prior weeks with Ozena has been to little avail," wrote Smith in an e-mail to Rodriguez. "This morning, Dec. 18, 2008, a dark blue, double hopper truck from Pride Trucking passed by Nordhoff High School just as students were arriving, heading north at 7:37 a.m., in apparent violation of the allowed hours of travel through the Ojai Valley."

     That is only one of eight complaints noted in the e-mail sent to Rodriguez by Smith regarding Ozena's operations in the last two months.

     According to Smith, he was pleased by the footnote in County Court Judge Glen Reiser's Dec. 10 decision rejecting Ozena's owner Elizabeth Virgilio's writ petition, saying that the owners should be happy they can continue to operate at all. In a recent e-mail to members, Smith wrote, "It is a huge victory for the Stop the Trucks Coalition, particularly considering a footnote by Judge Reiser, which states: 'The initial permit allows for a five-year extension if the Planning Director, assuming, 'all conditions have been continuously complied with' by petitioners, authorizes such continued use. Since the County has already found permit violations, it might well be an abuse of discretion for the Planning Director to authorize such an extension. This issue however is not before the court.'"

     Smith's e-mail also points out another oversight by county officials who failed to heed warnings about the potential collapse of State Route 33. The road, in fact, collapsed in February of 2008.

     According to Smith, in a letter dated Aug. 21, 2006, the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council warned county officials that "SR-33 has suffered many landslides and slipped roadways in past years. The vibration created by the mine's trucks on SR-33 may be adding significantly to the problem of road slippage, slumps, and slides. No review of vibration as a potential impact on SR-33 has been included in the Draft MND and vibration from trucks may present a significant adverse impact on the environment."

     According to Smith, a Caltrans District 7 traffic study dated July 2007, concluded that State Route 33 is maintained to provide safe travel for all motorists and is designed to accommodate large trucks. After the collapse, Maria Raptis, spokesperson for Caltrans District 7, said that the study had focused exclusively on the geometric design of the road for safe and orderly movement of vehicles, but not on the effect of the vibrations caused by the heavy trucks.

     Stop the Trucks Coalition has repeatedly questioned whether SR-33 should be open to any heavy gravel trucks. Smith questions "why extensive studies of the impact of gravel trucks are being excluded from the EIR review process."

Truck travel and its regulation are further complicated for area governments as gravel trucks often travel across county boundaries, necessitating that area governments work together.

     Stop the Trucks and officials from both Santa Barbara and Ventura counties reached a temporary solution at an earlier hearing for expansion of the Diamond Rock Mine. They decided further escalation of trips into their boundaries was best achieved by cooperation and promised to only grant new, or modifying existing C.U.P.s, for mining operations whose traffic stayed within their own boundaries. The compromise is tenuous, depending on each county to uphold their end of the bargain. No other method has been put forward since for a problem that seems unlikely to go away soon.

     The future of this issue is further complicated by what Caltrans sees as an increasing need for materials to maintain state infrastructure. Stop The Trucks and the Ojai Valley may face an uphill battle if the demand for gravel rises with potential funding from the incoming Obama administration, an issue Ventura County Supervisor Steve Bennett addressed in a recent e-mail.

     "The county doesn't actually expect a windfall of infrastructure funding," said Bennett, "nor any substantial increase in public works projects in the Ojai Valley. However … if additional state and or federal transportation funding becomes available it would move up the repaving of county roads; i.e. roads would be repaved sooner rather than later."

 

 

Ozena Loses Court Case on Trucking Hours

     In a case titled "Elizabeth Ann Vergilio Vs. County of Ventura," the owners of the Ozena gravel mine challenged the County's right to impose hours of operation and transit through the Ojai Valley.

     Judge Reiser ruled against Virgilio and Ozena. Even though Stop the Trucks was not a direct participant in this case, it is a huge victory for the Coalition. Much of the County's brief was based on our research and complaints.

     The "Stop the Trucks" Coalition has not only been supporting the County's contention that the rules must hold, we've also insisted that the County also actually enforce those rules.

     Currently, Ozena is only allowed week day trips through the Ojai Valley from 6:00 am to 7:00 am and from 9:00 am to 3:00 pm.  A recent review of weigh tickets from a two month period last year by the Coalition showed that trucks from Ozena were possibly violating the schedule as much as 55% of all trips through the valley.

     In defense of the County, government lawyers acknowledge that a number of Planning Division staffers had made a numerous errors in regards understanding and enforcing the C.U.P but "planners have no power to change the terms (of the C.U.P.) approved by the Planning Commission. " County lawyers further note, "staff's misapplication of the Condition passively allowing truck travel during prohibited times does not and cannot effectuate a change to the Condition approved and adopted by the Commission."


     County Counsel went on to argue that:

      "…to the contrary, Planning staff has a ministerial duty to apply and enforce all Truck Travel conditions as they are approved by the Planning Commission." 

     And, "the 'clear and present duty' of the County Planning Division is its ongoing ministerial duty to apply and enforce the Condition as written and approved by the Planning Commission and re-adopted in Mod 1.

     Lawyers for the County made such a good case in noting both the apparent violations of the C.U.P. by Ozena and of the failure of the Planning Division to enforce the guidelines that Judge Reiser, in a footnote, went so far as to state that, 

     "The initial permit allows for a five-year extension if the Planning Director, assuming, 'all conditions have been continuously complied with' by petitioners, authorizes such continued use. Since the County has already found permit violations; it might well be an abuse of discretion for the Planning Director to authorize such an extension."

     Members of the "Stop the Trucks" Coalition will be meeting with County executives in early January to discuss this ruling and numerous other issues related to the operation of the Ozena gravel mine.

     Along with the snow, the recession, and our hidden cameras, the following sequence of complaints has led to a temporary but significant decrease in truck traffic coming over Route 33 from Ozena and through the Ojai Valley:

 

 

 

Complaint #1  November 24, 2008
 
To the Ventura County Planning Division and Resource Management Agency,
 
     Please consider this email my formal complaint against the permit holder for the Ozena Valley Ranch and Gravel Mine for violating the C.U.P. restrictions on hours of trucking through the Ojai Valley.
 
     On Friday morning, November 21st, I personally witnessed two double hopper gravel trucks heading north on Route 33 go through the "Y" intersection between 7:30am and 8:00am in direct violation of the C.U.P. limits on hours of travel through the valley.
 
     At 7:15 am today, November 24th, I personally witnessed one double hopper gravel truck from Swader Trucking heading up Route 33 and past Nordhoff High School in direct violation of the C.U.P. limits on hours of travel through the valley.
 
     This afternoon I personally witnessed four different double hopper gravel trucks coming down Route 33 apparently from the Ozena Valley Ranch and Gravel Mine. The trucks all passed through the Ojai valley between 3:00pm and 3:30 pm, also in violation of the C.U.P.
 
     We expect a full and complete investigation of this complaint.
 
Thank you,
 
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks
Complaint #2  December 3, 2008

     Dear Kim Rodriguez & Chris Stephens,
 
     Thank you for your response to our earlier complaint. We appreciate your quick action.
 
     Please add this to our prior complaint about C.U.P. Violations in conjunction with gravel tucking and the Ozena mine operation.
 
     Today, December 3, 2008, a double hopper truck went north up Maricopa Highway (Route 33) past the high school and hospital towards Ozena at 4:40 am, well before the 6:00 am to 7:00 am allowable access through the Ojai Valley. 
 
     At 7:10 am another double hopper, this one from Swader trucking (apparently one of the most regular possible violators) also went past the high school heading north as students were arriving.
 
     At 7:18 am, a third double hopper - possible another one from Swader - also headed north.
 
     About ten minutes later, at 7:30 am, a fourth truck was spotted doing the same. The last two trucks were the same color as the Swader trucks but their logos were hard to identify at the speed they were traveling.
 
     It is almost one year since you informed the operators of the Ozena Valley Ranch and Gravel Mine in writing that they must comply with the hours of the existing C.U.P. 
 
     When I met with Matt Carroll in July of 2008, I noted that violations of the time schedule were still occurring on essentially a daily basis. Many of us have not only witnessed these violations but have filmed some as well.
 
     These apparent ongoing violations were confirmed recently by the spouse of a former Planning Department employee who during a four day stay at the Ojai Valley Community Hospital, was repeatedly awoken as early as 4:00 am each day by gravel trucks accelerating as they headed north out of the traffic light at the"Y" and past the hospital and/or when coming south, braking at the same intersection.
 
     Last month the lawyers for "Stop the Trucks" had reported to Ventura County Counsel that as of August 4, 2008 the Virgilio Family had apparently been leasing their mining operation to Alliance, a gravel and trucking firm from up north. In our last public records request there was no indication that Alliance had agreed in writing as required by the C.U.P. to obey all conditions of the permit.
 
     Wouldn't it make sense given all that has transpired to require Ozena and Alliance to turn over all of their weigh tickets for the last 12 months to confirm compliance? And if not for the last 12 months, certainly as of August 4th? Doesn't this makes far more sense than doing it piecemeal?
 
     Wouldn't you agree that given what we all suspect to be the actual truth, a review of those records could be the beginning of the end of this entire conflict? And that is something I am sure we could all happily agree upon.
 
Happy Holidays, 
Howard J. Smith 
Complaint (#3) on Gravel Trucks Violating the C.U.P. on Monday, December 8, 2008

----- Original Message -----
From: Howard Smith
To: Kim Rodriguez ; chris.stephens@ventura.org ;
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:18 PM
Subject: Another Complaint (#3) on Gravel Trucks Violating the C.U.P. on Monday, December 8, 2008

Monday, December 8, 2008
 
     Dear Kim Rodriguez & Chris Stephens,
 
     On Monday, December 8, 2008 we spotted two more Swader double hopper gravel trucks apparently violating the C.U.P. by traveling south bound through the Ojai restricted zone at 3:33 pm and at 3:38 pm, which would again put them right in front of Nordhoff High School as students are leaving for the day.
 
     Your department's attention to this urgent matter is greatly appreciated.
 
Sincerely,
Howard Smith
smythe@ojai.net



From: Kim Rodriguez
To: Howard Smith
Cc: Carole Aragon ; Chris Stephens ; Patrick Richards
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: Another Complaint (#3) on Gravel Trucks Violating the C.U.P. on Monday, December 8, 2008

Good Morning Mr. Smith -

     We have received your complaint and will follow up. We will keep you posted on our findings.

Kim Rodriguez, AICP
Planning Director
County of Ventura
805.654.2481
kim.rodriguez@ventura.org
Complaint (#4) on Gravel Trucks Violating the C.U.P. on Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Tuesday, December 9, 2008
 
     Dear Kim Rodriguez & Chris Stephens,
 
     On Tuesday, December 9, 2008, between 8:22 am and 8:25 am we spotted three double hopper gravel trucks apparently violating the Ozena C.U.P. by heading north on Route 33 in the Ojai Valley restricted zone.
 
     That same afternoon we spotted three more double hopper trucks, two of which were from Swader, apparently violating the C.U.P. by traveling south bound through the Ojai restricted zone between 3:21 pm and 3:50 pm, which would, once again, put them right in front of Nordhoff High School as students are leaving for the day.
 
     Your department's attention to this urgent matter is greatly appreciated.
 
Sincerely,
Howard Smith
smythe@ojai.net
More Complaints (#5) & (#6) about Ozena, December 10, 2008
From: "Howard Smith" smythe@ojai.net> 12/10/2008 3:45 PM >>


Dear Kim Rodriguez,

     Thank you for your response to our prior complaints. Unfortunately we have two more to add.

     #5: This morning at about 4:40 am a double hopper truck apparently passed by the hospital & high school heading north toward Ozena well before allowable hours. Later that same morning what appeared to be the same vehicle, a light blue truck from Swader heading south left the restricted zone near Casitas Springs at about 7:10 am. 

     This afternoon, at precisely 3:24pm two more double hopper, both white in color, came south from Ozena and again passed by the high school and hospital. If correct, all of these would have be potential violations.


     #6: Two independent sources familiar with the gravel industry have reported that the alleged new operator, Alliance had possibly moved and expanded the processing plant; had expanded the size and location of the pit; and were allegedly washing and processing old concrete. If true, all would be potential C.U.P. violations.

     Further, at an October Ojai City Council meeting, the lawyer for Tony Virgilio and Ozena presented the City with a weigh ticket purportedly from October 8th, two months after the Virgilio family had allegedly leased the operation to Alliance. 

     That Virgilio had weigh tickets in his possession for that date leads us to wonder if in fact the Virgilo Family has both leased the operation to Alliance while continuing to fill orders separately as some means to appear to be in compliance while not actually being so. In other words, is he double dipping?

     We appreciate your efforts in investigating these matters.

Sincerely,
Howard Smith, Vice Chair
"Stop the Trucks"

 

Re: Thanks & More Complaints (5) & (6) about Ozena, December 10,2008
From: Kim Rodriguez <Kim.Rodriguez@ventura.org>
To: Howard Smith <smythe@ojai.net>
cc: Carole Aragon <Carole.Aragon@ventura.org>

     I received your complaint. Ms Aragon from our office reviews these complaints. I see that you forwarded this to her also so she will be getting back with you. Please call me directly if you have any questions on the process~

Kim
Formal Ozena trucking complaint of February 8, 2008
Bob Walker
Ojai, CA. 93023

February 13, 2008

Carole Aragon
Patrick Richard, Acting Director
County of Ventura
Planning Division
800 South Victoria Ave.
Ventura, CA 93009

Dear Carole and Patrick:

     I am sending you this formal complaint in response to seven trucks that I witnessed on February 8, 2008 violating Ozena Sand and Gravel Mine's hauling time restrictions.

     At 8:40 A.M. two Southbound Swader trucks hauling 3/8" gravel passed in front of my house. That would put those trucks in the Ojai City limits during the restricted time. Also, I witnessed five Northbound, empty, Valley Bulk trucks in front of my house starting at 8:45 A.M. This would place the trucks passing through the Ojai Valley during the restricted times. The first Valley Bulk truck returned Southbound loaded with washed concrete sand at 11:03 A.M. and the second truck at 11:06 A.M.

     The roads had been closed due to the recent snows. As soon as they were open, the trucks went right back to their old habits.

Sincerely, Bob Walker.

Dear Kim Rodriguez,

     This was perhaps the first morning in many months that none of our Coalition truck spotters were awakened by the sound of gravel trucks at 4:30 am. Perhaps your investigations are beginning to have an impact. Thank you...

     And thank you for you note - copied below - in which you inform us that Carole Aragon, the SMARA Coordinator, will be investigating our six (6) recent complaints. (also below)

     I do not know if you are aware of it or not, but while you were on leave last February and Mr. Richards was overseeing Ms. Aragon, a complaint was filed about Ozena by an affiliate of the Coalition, Bob Walker. This complaint was never fully investigated or responded to in any form. A copy of that complaint is below at the very bottom of this email. 

     According to documents that the "Stop the Trucks" Coalition obtained through our August 2008 Public Records Request, Ms. Aragon began her investigation but never completed it. To date, no one has ever responded to Mr. Walker about the issues he's raised. (And this isn't the first time a complaint from Mr. Walker regarding Ozena has gone unanswered and perhaps un-investigated.) Further, even though Ms. Aragon, in a letter to John Hecht, Ozena's agent, refers to a number of weigh tickets that she is reviewing, none of those weigh tickets were turned over to the Coalition in the course of our Public Records Request.

     Given these two issues, failure to fully investigate and failure to turn over documents under the Public Records Act, and Mr. Richards own record in regards Ozena, I hope you can understand our concern that our complaints are not only taken seriously but are adjudicated fully and properly. 

     As weigh tickets are the only CEQA tool the Planning Division currently has to ascertain compliance with the C.U.P., we trust you will take the necessary administrative steps to rectify these oversights.

With sincere thanks,

Howard Smith, Vice Chair
Stop the Trucks

     

 

     Ventura county Supervisor Steve Bennett  spoke to the Rotary Club of Ojai-West on November 14, 2008.  

(transcript from the Express Rotary Ojai-West Newsletter)

     Mr. Bennett  took a few questions after his talk, including a few concerning trucks in Ojai.   A lively discussion ensued with member Howard Smith,  co-chairman of the  Stop The Trucks  coalition: 

Smith:   "...recent documentation we've gotten from the county Planning Commission makes it evidently clear that they are doing everything they can to avoid compliance monitoring for conditional use permits for trucking."

Bennett: "...the Ozena Mine thought that their permit allowed them to do certain things, and quite frankly, the county staff person that worked with them agreed.  In fact, they were both interpreting the conditional use permit wrong.  Howard and a number of other people pointed that out.  And so county staff sensed that...I think, has been very..."

Smith:  "Just the opposite.  They've actually refused to turn over all the weigh tickets since that time.  They don't even have them in their possession to look at.  And that's the only document they are using for compliance monitoring. 

Bennett:  "That they don't have them in their possession, that doesn't mean that they are not trying to enforce.  What the planning staff said was, there were all kinds of violations while the planning staff and the mine both were interpreting the condition wrong. That planner that was doing that is no longer working on that case.  They made a decision. They said we're not going to go back and penalize the mine for those violations, but we will enforce it from now on. So I think that's where the difference is..."

Smith:  "But..."

Bennett: "Let me finish, Howie...  Just as they enforced it against all the other mines around Ventura County. 

     "Howard is asking for the weigh tickets.  That's how we see when the trucks are coming and going.  They don't get the weigh tickets every day from every mine.  Yet citizens complain that they go up and they check the weigh tickets for the time period there is a complaint.  So they don't have the weigh tickets for the whole year.  They sent Howard  the weigh tickets for...

Smith:  "One week."

Bennett:  "So they went up and did spot checks for one week, and they got weigh tickets for that week and turned them over to Howard.  It is a mine that I'm real concerned with.  So you say, what can you do?  Now that the problem has been fixed in terms of  misinterpretation, they certainly know that we want them to enforce those rules with that mine.  And we also know that we have to be consistent, we have to apply your enforcement consistently with all of the mines that are out there.  I think they're aware of that." 

     "They have some difficulties trying to gear up and get all of the talented people that they need to be able to do the enforcement of all of these mine conditions--probably one of the big enforcement issues that we really have to try to solve here in Ventura County.  We have mines all over in Ventura County, we have trucking all over in Ventura County.  We don't have as many talented people as I think we'd like to have to be able to do that.  We have to get better at finding and getting those people on board."

     I'd just like to say one more thing about the trucking issue.  I am absolutely committed to trying to protect the Ojai Valley from trucks roaring through.  But I think we all have to recognize that is a complicated issue in terms of it's a state highway.  You can't make county laws that deal with that.  There are legal rights of the property owners, the mine owners, etc.  So as much as we'd like to ride right in slice everybody's heads off and say No trucks running through here, that's really a formula to guarantee lots of trucks running through here.  Because if you legally make mistakes and do things wrong, you lose your ability to regulate the mines altogether.  

     There's a tendency to want to simply the trucking issue.  I wish you could simplify the trucking issue. But it's going to take a combination of hard work, savvy and everything else to minimize the impacts on the Ojai Valley.  That's the most that we'll be able to do.  Most of the trucks that you see going through the Ojai Valley come from Santa Barbara County, and we have not one bit of say about which trucks.  And so people imply that they're all Ventura County approved trucks.

     Just a few miles down the road  from mine we were talking about is a much bigger mine that sells much more aggregate and that comes through the Ojai Valley also..."

 

 

County Planning Officials Failed to Heed Warnings About Potential Road Collapse

Danger Apparently Still Being Ignored by Planning Division

   

(All pictures are courtesy of Maureen and Dan Smith, Wheeler Hot Springs)

        In a August 21, 2006 letter regarding the Ozena Valley Ranch Mining project, the Board of the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council warned Christopher Stephens, then the Director of Planning for the Ventura County Planning Division and now the head of the entire Resource Management Agency for the County, that:

      "SR-33 has suffered many landslides and slipped roadways in past years. The vibration created by the mine's trucks on SR-33 may be adding significantly to the problem of road slippage, slumps, and slides. No review of vibration as a potential impact on SR-33 has been included in the Draft MND and vibration from trucks may present a significant adverse impact on the environment."

     In February of 2008 a portion of Route 33 collapsed into the river. Below are a dozen photographs of the damage done, indicating the collapse was far more significant than originally reported.

     In August of 2008, the Stop the Trucks Coalition requested nine months of Ozena Valley Ranch trucking weigh tickets from Christopher Stephens in order to determine the mining operations degree of compliance with their permit. The tickets requested were from December 1, 2007 through August of 2008. A prior review of weigh tickets from August and July of 2007 by "Stop the Trucks," indicated that possibly as many as 55% of all trucks traveling through Ojai were in violation of permit restrictions. This figure was approximately ten times the  violations County Planning staff reported in their own study.

 

   

  

     The "Stop the Trucks" complaint about the inadequacy of Planning Division staff reviews and basements of violations was seconded by County CEO, Ms. Marty Robinson, in her September 30th letter to the Coalition. Christopher Stephens, response to our request for nine months of recent data was to instead provide us with only one week from April of 2008, claiming that the Agency had no other weigh tickets in its possession.

     Christopher Stephens' claim that the Agency has no other weigh tickets is directly contradicted by other letters and emails the Coalition has recently obtained in a second Public Records Request.  In those letters Planning staff discuss reviewing weigh tickets in response to a citizen complaint from that same nine month period.

 

   

 

    The "Stop the Trucks" Coalition is left wondering if this failure to disclose is simply an error or in fact part of a larger pattern going back to Mr. Stephens' days as Director of the Planning Division, of a possible unwillingness to monitor violations of a project for which he once had oversight.

     The warning from the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council to monitor road vibrations and related issues seems to have been totally ignored in early drafts of EIR oversight scoping documents, also obtained during the course of our Public Records Request.

 

  

  

   In July of 2007 - nine months before the road collapsed - CalTrans District 7 investigators concluded in a now controversial traffic study that State Route 33 is maintained to provide safe travel for all motorists, and is designed to accommodate large trucks.

     Scott Ellison, a planner with the Ventura County Planning Division, who worked under Mr. Stephens, was quoted in the Ventura County Reporter last year as saying:

      “They concluded it was safe for the trucks, as long as they followed the posted limitations.” Ellison added that CalTrans examined the “radius of the turns, the way the turns are sloped — road geometrics, looking at the height of the tunnels, for instance, blind curves, these sorts of things. They felt the road geometrics were safe for the trucks.  As a local agency we’re not likely to challenge a CalTrans safety study that’s two weeks old that looks at the road segment we’re interested in.”  

 

  

     After the collapse, Maria Raptis, spokesperson for CalTrans District 7 said that the study had focused exclusively on the geometric design of the road for safe and orderly movement of vehicles. According to CalTrans engineers it did not focus on the stability of the roads or the hydraulics."

     The "Stop the Trucks" Coalition has repeatedly questioned whether the vulnerable road should be open to any heavy gravel trucks. The Coalition has not only questioned why the possibility of such a failure had not been predicted during the CalTrans study of Highway 33, but why extensive studies of the impact of gravel trucks are seemingly being systematically excluded (along with many other issues) from the EIR review process. 

 

  

     The MAC letter also noted that:

      "The proposed Project Description includes references to truck trips increasing from 66 Average Daily Trips to 132 Average Daily Trips (ADT). By using Average Daily Trips, both in the Project Description and proposed mitigation measures for Noise and Vibration, and Traffic and Circulation, Planning staff has failed to actually limit daily truck traffic. Using an average provides for extremes in actual trips.

     In addition, mitigation measures based upon using ADT may also have significant adverse environmental effects associated with them because the actual number of trips per day cannot be controlled. Furthermore, monitoring an average would be nearly impossible. If monitoring is nearly impossible, then the proposed mitigation measure is infeasible and does not comply with the intent of State and County environmental requirements."

You be the judge, Ojai…

 

 

 

Ojai Valley News for Friday's edition.   
Friday, October 17, 2008

 

Council To Help Fund Stop The Trucks Effort 
While Diamond Rock gravel trucks slowed down for time being, new threats looming

 

By Nao Braverman

     At Tuesday night’s City Council meeting the council agreed to give financial support to the Stop the Trucks Coalition, after the a semi-victory for the citizens’ group in August.

     “After this agreement has been worked out, keeping the Diamond Rock Mine’s trucks out of Ojai, it has been pretty clear to me that whatever this group did, they did it successfully,” said Mayor Sue Horgan.

     The recent legal settlement granted to the coalition, preventing the Diamond Rock Mine from sending gravel trucks through Ojai until 2012, has given the Stop the Truck’s Coalition some respite. 

    But the Ozena Valley Ranch Mine’s expansion looms ahead, with many potential consequences endangering Ojai’s safety, tourist economy and quality of life, said Scott Eicher, a member of the Stop the Trucks Coalition and CEO of the Ojai Valley Chamber of Commerce. 

     The coalition members pleaded for some financial backing from the city to help them battle increased truck traffic from the Ozena Valley Ranch which is looking to expand.

     So far the coalition has spent about $60,000, with $41,000 toward the settlement agreement with the owners of the Diamond Rock Mine, coalition representative Howard Smith told the council.

      Council members were eager to support the committee. 

     “I think the Stop the Trucks Coalition has done all this work and the city has benefitted from it,” said Councilman Steve Olsen. “I think a financial thank-you would be appropriate.”

     But since the city is not legally in the position to give a gift of public funds, council members have to come up with findings that demonstrate that the money will go to a legitimate public purpose. They would also have to do some work to come up with a specific amount to give the coalition, they decided.

     “The coalition has spent $60,000, $41,000 on the agreement with the Diamond Rock Mine which was hugely successful,” she said. “I think giving anything up to $41,000 can be justified.” 

     But council members agreed that it would be wise to wait and meet again with members of Stop the Trucks to come up with a methodology for finding the exact amount the city should give the coalition, and a way to keep track of how the money is spent. 

     A motion was made for city staff to return to the council with a resolution to give financial support to the coalition, leaving the amount blank. 
The motion passed unanimously.

 

 

October  12, 2008  --  For all the details please click HERE.  


1. Ojai City Council to Meet Tuesday on how to Deal with Ozena:

     This Tuesday, October 14th, at 7:30 pm the Ojai City Council will meet for its regular session. Part of the agenda will be devoted to discussions on how to co-ordinate efforts to deal with the Ozena Valley Ranch & Gravel Mine's proposed renewal and modification of their C.U.P. with the County of Ventura.

     Given the well-documented negative impact of these highly disruptive and polluting mining and trucking operations on agriculture, fishing, the economy, our water supply, our environment and the health of our children, the "Stop the Trucks" Coalition urges everyone in the Ojai Valley to attend and share your opinions with the City Council.


2. Ozena Wants to Expand Hours of Trucking Thru Ojai and Hand Pick the Consultant who will Review their new Proposal!

     In documents recently obtained by the Ojai "Stop the Trucks" through a Ventura County Public Records Request, the Coalition has learned that Ozena wants to alter their existing permit so that trucking through the Ojai Valley will begin as early as 3:00 am and continue as late as 6:00 pm during the week with "No Route Restrictions" at all on Saturdays!

     This proposal would more than double trucking from a total of seven hours a day during the week to a new and even more intrusive and disturbing 15 hours a day!

     In a recent review of weigh tickets from 2007, the "Stop the Trucks" Coalition estimated that Ozena is likely now violating existing permit hours in trips through Ojai by as much as 55%. In a letter to "Stop the Trucks," County CEO, Ms. Marty Robinson, agreed with the Coalition that violations have been under reported by the Planning Division.

     In a further review of emails obtained through that same Records Request, we found that the agent for Ozena, John Hecht of West Coast Environmental & Engineering, rejected the consultant the County originally selected, URS, because: 

     "...the proposed costs did not appear in line to the anticipated scope of work. Ozena believes that a competitive process will provide a qualified CEQA contractor in a more cost effective manner."

    
In a separate email Mr. Hecht then went on to propose the names of three other firms:

     "Per our discussions, the following consultants that we are familiar with that are qualified to provide services to the county on mineral extraction and other industrial services:       Mr. Marty Derus, Lilburn Corporation of San Bernardino; Mr. Tony Locacciato, Managing Principal of Impact Science, Inc.; and Mr. Warren Coalson of Enviromine, Inc. of San Diego."


     Additionally Mr. Hecht, on behalf of Ozena, asks that a second C.U.P. proposal on building an Aquaculture stock pond be including in the same review. 

     This Aquaculture proposal of Ozena's keeps popping up like a mummy in some horror movie, despite the fact that in 2004, a consultant for the County, David Magney & Associates reported "Potentially Significant" Environmental Impacts."

     Magney wrote: 

     "Mosquito Fish and Catfish are nonnative invasive fish species. Presently, neither Mosquitofish nor Catfish are known to occur in the upper Cuyama River and tributaries. Aquaculture of these fish species, into isolated ponds in areas adjacent to a natural river system (Cuyama River), creates a high potential for the introduction of these species into the Cuyama River and tributaries." "Mosquito Fish and Catfish will inevitably escape and colonize natural stream habitats." "Catfish and Mosquito Fish are scavengers and eat almost anything that fits in their mouths." "...these fishes will potentially swim upstream into river habitats inhabit by populations of Rainbow trout." "The introduction of these fishes creates the potential for populations of native natural fishes and amphibians to be lost."



3. County CEO Finds Ozena Violations Greater Than Reported

     In a letter to the Ojai "Stop the Trucks" Coalition, Ventura County CEO, Ms. Marty Robinson, wrote: 

     "After the CEO's office reviewed the July and August 2007 weigh tickets tickets communicated by the RMA" (Resource Management Agency) "a statistically significant sampling of the 649 original tickets was conducted by our office and it was determined that potential northbound violations were omitted from consideration by the Planning Division. If these potential northbound violations had been included , the number of violations would have been materially higher..."

     "Stop the Trucks" had previously reported that upwards of 55% of all Ozena related trips through the Ojai Valley were likely in violation of these rules.

     CEO Robinson went on to say that: 

     "Planning staff has been apprised of this finding and are clear that future reviews need to be accurate, including both northbound and southbound traffic to the mine..."

     "Additionally, we requested the Planning Division conduct a full month sampling of current year weigh tickets... Should this future sampling establish the existence of permit violations, further enforcement actions as prescribed by the Non-Coastal Zoning Ordinance will be considered by the Planning Director.

     The County will provide your organization with the results of that weigh ticket evaluation upon completion."



4. Early Morning Violators Now on Film

     The "Stop the Trucks" Coalition is now testing prototype camera systems to track early morning violators of the Ozena Gravel Mining & Trucking C.U.P.

     On the morning of 10/8/08 at the "Y" at 5:45am; A tandem truck turned round the bend, 33 northbound.  We photographed it as it passed in front of the Ojai Pet Hospital driveway.


 

     For the second truck we triggered the remote camera:  Although this test model does not print the time stamp, that data is stored and dated in the memory card.  This one was stored at 5:57 AM.

To view a sample of our covert filming   CLICK HERE.

 

 

Stop the Trucks:  Ventura County Officials Finally Admit there are Problems 

and  MAC Candidate Jerry Kaplan Responds to our Election Year Questions

33beforeHD .jpg
(CalTrans photo of the collapse of Maricopa Highway in Cuyama Valley)

     Last week in a Ventura County Star article by Tony Biasotti, Ventura County officials conceded that there are significant problems in the Planning Division.  CLICK HERE to see it for yourself.  The real questions is this: Are they Willing To Change?

     According to Biasotti Ventura County officials hosted an unusual meeting in a conference room just off of the courthouse cafeteria.

     "Everyone on our team has affirmed we have a problem here," Matt Carroll, the top deputy to County Executive Officer Marty Robinson, said at the opening of the meeting. "The facts speak for themselves."

     "Complaints about the system from developers and property owners are nothing new..." " But this time, the county is listening and often agreeing..."

     "Last year, the county commissioned a report on its land-use procedures by Tom Berg, a consultant who once held (Chris) Stephens' current position as Resource Management Agency director. Based on interviews with 75 people in and out of county government, Berg's report concluded that the land-use process was in need of "systemic changes."

     "The county put together a committee of high-level managers, including Carroll and Stephens, to analyze Berg's recommendations and start putting them into action."

Summer & Signal.JPG
(Gravel Truck cutting through Ojai at Summer & Signal. Photo Daly Road Graphics)


     One participant said "She's particularly concerned that the committee isn't supporting Berg's recommendation to hire a land-use ombudsman, a high-level person outside the Resource Management Agency who would deal with citizen complaints."

     "There's also some skepticism from players in the process who aren't developers. Howard Smith is a founding member of Stop the Trucks, a group in Ojai that has filed complaints with the county against the companies that send trucks through the Ojai Valley from the quarries and gravel mines to the north. He was interviewed for Berg's report and he has spoken to the Board of Supervisors about the proposed reforms, but he said he wasn't invited to last week's workshop.

     "Smith said he's worried that his group's concern — the lack of attention paid to enforcing the conditions of permits granted to the gravel mines and other companies — will be pushed aside."

     "I don't sense any willingness on the part of the mid-level staff to actually deal with this," he said. "The notion of having to discipline someone seems like an anathema to them."

012208 Ojai Montgormery2.jpg
(Gravel Truck stopped on Ojai Ave. Photo credit to Daly Road Graphics)


Jerry Kaplan, the first candidate competing for a seat on the MAC (Municipal Advisor Council) 
has joined Suza Francina in responding to our questions for candidates. 

     Jerry is running for the seat from District Seven, which covers most of the East End and the Far Northwest side of the Valley. "Stop the Trucks" hopes the other MAC candidates and those running for the City Council will take a few moments to answer a few questions online. We would like each candidate to share their thoughts with the public on the how they intend to deal with the long term threat posed by gravel trucking through Ojai and the blind eye that the Ventura County Planning Division is seemingly paying to regular daily violations of the existing Conditional Use Permits (C.U.P.'s). 

1.  Do you now or have you in the past personally supported “Stop the Trucks!”

     As a founding member of “The Coalition to Stop the Trucks” I have been a very active and supporting member of this Coalition. I first became aware of this potential problem when I attended a meeting of the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council over a year ago. I immediately contacted Howard Smith, a community active Ojai resident, who was then President of VCEDA (Ventura County Economic Development Association), to see if he was aware of the problem of gravel trucks coming through the Ojai Valley. After Howard did some research, we formed the “Coalition” and Howard immediately alerted the Ventura County Star and the Ojai Valley News. From that start the “Coalition” has grown into a hard hitting successful advocate of the Greater Ojai Valley’s fight to stop the potential extremely harmful effects on the Citizens way of life in the Greater Ojai Valley. Everyone living or working the Ojai Valley should be big supporters of the “Coalition to Stop the Trucks”. My concern over this issue, as well as other issues facing our valley, caused me to run for the Municipal Advisory Council (MAC).

2.  If so please give examples of actions you have taken.

     Besides being a founder of the Coalition I have donated money and time and energy in helping to develop the Coalition. I have done substantial research in support of the successful actions taken to stop the trucks and my wife, Anne Grupp-Kaplan, a successful attorney, continue being involved in the decision making process of the Coalition. We, along with several other members of the coalition traveled to Santa Maria to participate in hearings by the Santa Barbara County Planning Commission on applications for new mines in Santa Barbara County which could have sent hundreds of gravel trucks through the Ojai Valley every day. I arranged for an Ojai Rotary Club informational forum on the potential substantial problems with highways 33 and 150 as a result of gravel trucks use of these highways. The discussions were between Howard Smith (delete this: who was then president of the Coalition), and Sameer Haddadeen, Chief, Office of Traffic Investigations, CalTrans, District 7. I have been a speaker before several groups, organizations and Los Padres Forest personnel and volunteers explaining how continued and increased Gravel truck traffic through the Greater Ojai Valley would have catastrophic effects on all aspects of this area. I continue being an active member of the Coalition and do everything I can to support its activities.


3.  Do you believe the Ojai City Council should take a more active role in the truck campaign, such as providing funding and legal support?

     I am running for the MAC, which advises the County Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission. However, I believe the city of Ojai should be providing substantial support for the Coalition in all areas including financial, legal, research, personnel, and assistance with dealing with other government agencies at all levels. The potential adverse effects include economic, environmental, safety, to name a few. We could be dealing with the life or death of our Valley as we know it.


4.  If so, can you name specific steps that you believe the City can and should undertake?

The City of Ojai, with a population of around 8,000 people is the hub of the Greater Ojai Valley which has a population of around 30,000. As a result I believe that the City Council has the responsibility of being substantially involved in anything that threatens all of the residents of the Ojai Valley. There is substantial interaction between the City and the surrounding non incorporated areas. The City Council is the glue that holds the Greater Ojai Valley together. In this instance, which is similar to the Weldon Canyon situation, the City Council and the City of Ojai should be in the forefront of providing the where with all and leadership, in partnership with the Coalition to Stop the Trucks, to fend off this substantial attack on the Ojai Valley. The City should also be reaching out to all organizations in the Greater Ojai Valley for support and involvement, as partners in this project. This should include the Municipal Advisory Council, the community leadership group in Oak View and all other components of the Greater Ojai Valley. The City of Ojai should also be providing the leadership for a visioning and strategic planning for the next 25 to 50 years in order to get ahead of the curve and eliminating threats to our community like the “Gravel Trucks” Either the Greater Ojai Valley does its best to control the changes which will take place in the future, or others will. Since “Change” is the only constant in life I vote for doing our best to control it as much as possible.

     The Coalition to Stop the Trucks is and has been doing an outstanding job of fighting off the Gravel Truck threats. The City of Ojai should immediately join with, add support in every possible way and participate with the Coalition in all aspects of this fight!



5.  Do you believe the City should work with CalTrans to permanently ban all thru trucking on Route 33 north of Ojai and on Route 150 through downtown Ojai?

     Absolutely! I also feel that joint City and County action should be taken to eliminate all unnecessary or high impact traffic on all of route 33 and 150. This concept would need to be researched so as not to harm healthy and necessary traffic through these areas. If I am elected to the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council I pledge to work hard to help these suggestions become fact.

6.   If so, what specific steps would you take to see this accomplished?

     Please see my answer to question 5, above. Also, because I have been and still am very substantially involved with the “Coalition” I would continue to strongly support the many and creative possible steps we have developed for accomplishing and monitoring such a ban on specific heavy truck traffic through the Greater Ojai Valley.

     7.  The Ozena mine’s county permit states its “normal hours of operation” for trucks traveling on Highway 33 in the Ojai Valley are from 6 to 7 a.m. and from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., yet they seem to be in violation of these conditions and so far County officials have failed to take any action. What steps should the City take to see that County officials enforce the Permit?

     The Coalition is doing and has done an incredible job of researching, investigating and demanding public records relating to these violations. As MAC advises the county, I would hope to bring pressure so that these enforcement problems are solved.
 


8.   Would you actively support the Coalition’s request to have an independent Ombudsman appointed to not only undertake a further investigation into the abuse of CUP 5170 by the permit holders, but also the very operation of compliance monitoring by the Planning Division?

     Absolutely! Again, because of my ongoing involvement with the “Coalition” I am very aware of the great need for an appointment of an Ombudsman not only to investigate the Ozena Mine’s activities, but possibly more important, the seemingly absolute faultiness of the Ventura County Planning Department to do their duty of correctly and consistently monitoring the Conditional Use Permit’s they issue. The Director of the Planning Department admitted this during a meeting with the Supervisors of Ventura County! Also, if I am elected to the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council (MAC) I will actively pursue this request until it happens!!


9.  Given the Planning Divisions claim that it is seemingly impossible to monitor C.U.P. compliance, do you agree that the County has no business, under CEQA guidelines, approving the CUP in the first place?

     Absolutely! The Coalition has done substantial research into ways of providing accurate and consistent monitoring of CUP’s such as Ozena’s. This has been discussed with the Planning Department of Ventura County yet they still have done nothing to make it happen.



10.   Do you believe the County should begin the process to terminate Ozena’s current C.U.P.?

The Coalition has provided the County Planning Department much more than all the information they need to proceed with this termination. Again, if elected to MAC I would bring this to the attention of the other members and suggest that immediate action be taken by the Ventura County Board of Supervisors to assure that the Planning Department does its job, correctly and quickly, including terminating the current C.U.P.



11.  And if so, how would you persuade the County to accomplish this?

     See answer for question 10, above. Also, I would continue to work hard, as a founding member of the Coalition to Stop the Trucks, to use all of our creativity and persistence to cause a permanent ban on all through heavy trucking, such as gravel trucks, on all of Highways 33 and 150.

     As a member of the Ojai Valley Municipal Advisory Council, I would do everything possible to educate the council and the Board of Supervisors on this threat to the Greater Ojai Valley, including facilitating meetings with members of the Coalition which, I believe, would help them understand and take action on the threats and evidence of wrongdoing by Ozena and the misconduct of the Planning Department.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Send your donations to the Stop The Trucks! Coalition – c/o The Ojai Chamber of Commerce, P.O. Box 1134, Ojai, CA, 93024.

You may also walk your contribution into the Chamber’s offices anytime during the business week, 
at 201 S. Signal Street -- in the Ojai Festivals building -- in downtown Ojai.

CLICK HERE to see the Stop The Trucks blog.

 

 

 

CLICK HERE To comment or answer the questions posted by the Coalition.

 

Stop the Trucks:   Election Year Edition

Do You Support this Vision of Ojai? Or This Vision?

     With five candidates competing for two City Council vacancies and several of the MAC (Municipal Advisory Council) seats also facing competitive races, the Ojai "Stop the Trucks!" Coalition is asking everyone running for office to take a few moments to answer a few questions online. 

     We would like each candidate to share their thoughts with the public on the how they intend to deal with the long term threat posed by gravel trucking through Ojai and the blind eye that the Ventura County Planning Division is seemingly paying to regular daily violations of the existing Conditional Use Permits (C.U.P.'s).

     A Gravel Truck heads up Maricopa Highway on Christmas Day.  Each double hopper truck weighs up to 80,000 pounds. According to recent Federal government reports one such truck does as much road damage at 9,600 cars.      Photo:  Daly Road Graphics.


Background:

     There are six mines working or in the application phase. Permits are approved or pending would allow 600-800 gravel truck trips per day through Ojai on both Routes 33 to Ventura & Oxnard and 150 through downtown and the East End to Santa Paula. That is one truck every 3-5 minutes of the day, seven days a week, 24 hours a day.

     This volume of trucking through Ojai could permanently destroy our three key industries, tourism, agriculture and education.  It would turn our town into an industrial truck road and irreparably transform the valley.

     In addition to the danger of having this many trucks on 33 & 150, carcinogenic particulate matter combined with gaseous diesel exhaust will dangerously pollute the fragile Ojai Valley air shed. This will dramatically increase health concerns for what is already the second worse air quality in Ventura County.

Photo:  Daly Road Graphics

 

A)    A recent agreement between the Coalition and the Diamond Rock Mine in the Santa Barbara, clears the stage for the Coalition to focus more of its attention on the operation of the Ozena Valley Ranch Mine in Ventura County.

B)    Recently the Ventura County Planning Division acknowledged that no independent review was ever conducted on the prior Ozena Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) applications dating back to 2001.

C)    In response to a complaint by the Coalition about violations of the existing Ozena permit hours of operation, County Planning Division staff claimed the violations were insignificant and that the Director of the Planning Division will not retroactively enforce violations.

D)    Reviewing the same records the Coalition found that of the 649 weigh tickets examined, 476 were for trucks that used Route 33 north or south through Ojai and Casitas Springs. By our count over 268 -- or over 40% of the total, amounting to an astonishing 55% of those going through our valley -- were in apparent violation of Condition No. 72 of CUP 5170.

E)    The Coalition has asked Ventura County Executive Marty Robinson to appoint an Ombudsman to investigate the conduct of the entire application process by Planning Division staff and to initiate the termination process due to significant violations of Ozena's existing C.U.P. conditions

 

A double hopper cruises down Ojai Avenue during the morning rush hour. 

    According to Ray, "This afternoon, Wednesday, April 16th, after some shopping at the 'Y', I noticed a tandem turn left instead right of at the light. That's eastward along 150, and not South on 33. So I followed along to see what was up. The truck went past the museum, past the Post Office through the center of town, and on past Ojai Lumber, past Boccali's and up the Dennison grade."

Photo:  Daly Road Graphics



Here are our  Questions for Candidates:

1)    Do you now or have you in the past personally supported "Stop the Trucks!"

2)      If so, please give examples of actions you have actually taken.

 

The same double hopper attempts to climb the grade past Boccali's. The truck struggles to stay within the lanes. Who says trucks won't cut through Ojai on 150 to get to Santa Paula? 

 

Photo credit to Daly Road Graphics

 

3)   Do you believe the Ojai City Council should take a more active role in the truck campaign, such as providing funding and legal support?

4)    If so, can you name specific steps that you believe the City can and should undertake?

(Two Gravel Trucks in a row coming down from Ozena whiz past Nordhoff High School. Photo credit to Rob Varela, VC Star)

5)    Do you believe the City should work with CalTrans to permanently ban all thru heavy trucking on Route 33 north of Ojai and on Route 150 through downtown Ojai?

6)    If so, what specific steps would you take to see that this is accomplished.

 

 

Another fully loaded truck crosses the yellow line while coming around a blind curve on Route 33.


Photo credit to Forest Watch, Jeff Kuyper

 

7)    The Ozena mine's county permit states its "normal hours of operation" for trucks traveling on Highway 33 in the Ojai Valley are from 6 to 7 a.m. and from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., yet they seem to be in violation of these conditions and so far County officials have failed to take any action. What steps should the City take to see that County officials enforce the permit?

8)    Would you actively support the Coalition's request to have an independent Ombudsman appointed to not only undertake a further investigation into abuse of CUP 5170 by the permit holders, but also the very operation of compliance monitoring by the Planning Division?

 

      "The morning traffic jam at the "Y" is getting worse. These two tandems have just cut across Ojai on it's main street, westbound. The red one turned south. The white one headed north."

 

Photo Credit to Ray Smith

 

9)    Given the Planning Division's claim that it is seemingly impossible to monitor C.U.P. compliance, do you agree that the County has no business, under CEQA guidelines, approving the C.U.P. in the first place?

 

     Each fully loaded double hopper truck weighs close to 80,000 pounds, the same as fifteen SUV's stacked on top of each other. 

     Ray Smith shot this on Friday, August 10, 2007, mid-morning. The truck was going up the Arnaz Grade when the engine quit, blocking the right lane until a tow truck arrived and got it restarted. Afterward, the driver climbed to the top of the hill and used and Dahl Supermarket parking lot to turn his rig around and head down again. The picture shows him in the market parking lot.

 

10) Do you believe the County should begin the process to terminate Ozena's current C.U.P.?

11) And if so, how would you persuade the County to accomplish this?

 

Traffic backing up behind a gravel truck on Route 33.      Photo Daly Road Graphics


     We also need the continued support of everyone in Ojai to see that these past travesties do not happen again. Please send your donations to the Stop The Trucks! Coalition – c/o The Ojai Chamber of Commerce, P.O. Box 1134, Ojai, CA, 93024, or you may also walk your contribution into the Chamber’s offices anytime during the business week, at 201 S. Signal Street -- in the Ojai Festivals building -- in downtown Ojai. 


To comment or answer the questions posted by the Coalition, please CLICK HERE

 

 

Response from Ojai City Council Candidate Suza Francina to "Our Questions for Candidates"


1) Do you now or have you in the past personally supported "Stop the Trucks!"

     I have read all the editorials, letters and miscellaneous articles by the Stop the Trucks Coalition and have conveyed to family, friends and co-workers that the trucks represent a serious problem for the future of the valley, comparable to Weldon Dump.

2) If so, please give examples of actions you have actually taken.
(See previous response.)

3) Do you believe the Ojai City Council should take a more active role in the truck campaign, such as providing funding and legal support?

     Yes! I strongly feel that the City should do much more to support your efforts. It is my understanding that Jere Kersnar and Carol Smith did go to Santa Maria to speak to the County Board of Supervisors. I read the letter dated January, 2007 to the Planning Commissioners, County of Santa Barbara (posted on the City web site) which states the City of Ojai's absolute and unanimous opposition to the proposed Diamond Rock Sand and Gravel Mine.

4) If so, can you name specific steps that you believe the City can and should undertake?

     The City should take a leadership role similar to when we fought and defeated Weldon Dump. I believe the City should provide funds for legal fees as this is an investment for Ojai's future that has far-reaching economic effects.

     Regardless of who wins the presidency there will be a big push to rebuild the infrastructure of this country. These mines will be an integral part of this rebuilding and without intervention Ojai could see more trucks than currently imaginable.

     The Ojai City Council and the citizens of Ojai need to go to Sacramento to lobby the Governor, CalTrans, EPA, Tourism etc. for a Save Our Town lobby day. Make a splash that will attract the press and change the dynamics of this issue in the minds of the government.

     In addition, I would explore the following points:

     Stop the Trucks needs to go after the press in Los Angeles and Sacramento and get much more publicity. You need B Roll Video Footage for the TV and print for the papers. 30% to 50% of all news comes from groups out side of the newspapers and TV staff. We have to produce the news for the news reporters.

     I would want to find out if there is an organization of small towns in California or the US that fights similar scenarios.

     Stop the Trucks and the City of Ojai must to talk to the California Travel & Tourism Commission to find ways to legally protect our tourist economy.

     Stop the Trucks appears to be fighting the trucks on the battlefield that best suits the trucking companies. Change the battle field and throw the gravel truckers off balance.


5) Do you believe the City should work with CalTrans to permanently ban all thru heavy trucking on Route 33 north of Ojai and on Route 150 through downtown Ojai?

     YES but with possible exceptions for Agriculture, Home movers, Building Supplies, Groceries, etc.

6) If so, what specific steps would you take to see that this is accomplished.

     While working on the ban there are some steps that can be taken to complicate the trucks traveling through the valley.

     First, we should contact the California Department of weights and measures to make sure the scales are accurate and that all gravel trucks meet weight requirements.

     Second, we need to know to what degree the dust and diesel emissions add to the valley’s already failing air quality grades from organizations like the American Lung Association.

     Third, find out if the trucks are subject to the slow traffic rules that require trucks to pull off the road when there are 5 or more cars behind them. Then find out if they are exceeding the safe speed required for heavy trucks with Cal Trans monitoring units. (You may all ready have this data in your reports) but this seems critical to know.

     Fourth, make a point of having the sheriffs department check the driver’s licenses of truck drivers on a routine random basis and also have them check to make sure all gravel trucks meet California safety codes.

     The idea is to make gravel haulers trips more difficult, slow them down and make the 33 and 101 uneconomical.

7) The Ozena mine's county permit states its "normal hours of operation" for trucks traveling on Highway 33 in the Ojai Valley are from 6 to 7 a.m. and from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., yet they seem to be in violation of these conditions and so far County officials have failed to take any action.

What steps should the City take to see that County officials enforce the permit?

     Contact Cal Trans and ask for copies of the time stamped trip/weight tickets that must travel with each load to make sure the travel guidelines are being followed.

8) Would you actively support the Coalition's request to have an independent Ombudsman appointed to not only undertake a further investigation into abuse of CUP 5170 by the permit holders, but also the very operation of compliance monitoring by the Planning Division?

     YES!

9) Given the Planning Division's claim that it is seemingly impossible to monitor C.U.P. compliance, do you agree that the County has no business, under CEQA guidelines, approving the C.U.P. in the first place?

     YES, however this is the 21st century, most trucks have or can be equipped with digital monitoring devices. These tracking devices are linked to satellites for real time data so show where each truck is at all times. This is not some new space age technology. It’s being used now by most major trucking companies in the world. The Planning Division is either staffed by Luddites or they are not being truthful.

10) Do you believe the County should begin the process to terminate Ozena's current C.U.P.? YES

11) And if so, how would you persuade the County to accomplish this?

     In the EIR , the analysis concluded that there were negative quality of life impacts to the citizens of Ojai that could not be mitigated.

     City leaders and council members should continue to convey their strong opposition backed up with legal teeth. The city should also demand air quality analysis based on the average exhaust and dust emitted by the trucks, then scale up the analysis based on proposed trips in the valley. The federal EPA should also be contacted to enforce air quality standards.

     If I were on the Ojai City Council I would leave no stone unturned in solving this problem!


Comment #4 Posted by: Suza Francina | August 26, 2008 07:05 PM
Suza Francina
Ojai City Council Candidate
511 W. Eucalyptus Street
Ojai, California, 93023
(805) 646-2613
Cell: (805) 603-8635


 


Stop the Trucks

Conflict over Gravel Trucking shifts from Santa Barbara to Ventura County and the Ozena Mine After Agreement with Troesh Family

A recent agreement (see below) between the Stop the Trucks Coalition and the Troesh family over their proposed Diamond Rock Mine in the Santa Barbara portion of the Cuyama Valley, clears the stage for the Coalition to focus more of its attention on the operation of the Ozena Valley Ranch Mine in Ventura County.

In the wake of the disclosure by the Ventura County Planning Division that no independent review was ever conducted on the prior Ozena Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) applications dating back to 2001, Stop the Trucks has asked Ventura County Executive Marty Robinson to appoint an Ombudsman to investigate the conduct of the entire application process by Planning Division staff and to initiate the termination process due to significant violations of existing C.U.P. conditions.

Left:  (Gravel Truck Congestion at the "Y." Photo credit to Daly Road Graphics)

 

We need the continued support of everyone in Ojai to see that these past travesties do not happen again.

Please send your donations to the: Stop The Trucks! Coalition – c/o The Ojai Chamber of Commerce, P.O. Box 1134, Ojai, CA, 93024,

Or you may also walk your contribution into the Chamber’s offices anytime during the business week, 
at 201 S. Signal Street -- in the Ojai Festivals building -- in downtown Ojai.


EXPLAINING THE BENEFITS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN TROESH MATERIALS, INC
 / DIAMOND ROCK MINE AND THE STOP THE TRUCKS! COALITION

     The Santa Barbara County Planning Commission approved the Diamond Rock Mine project (“Project”) with no trucks going south on State Highway 33, which has always been the objective of the Stop The Trucks! Coalition. However, Troesh Materials, Inc., the owner-operators of the Santa Barbara County-based Diamond Rock Mine, or its successor, could come in at any time and seek a modification of the Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) to allow trucks to go south on State Highway 33. Because such a use was analyzed in their Environmental Impact Report – albeit, inadequately -- the danger to residents of the Ojai Valley is that no further environmental analysis might ever be prepared. Therefore, the Stop The Trucks! Coalition reached a Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) to address this issue. The major benefit of our agreement is that Troesh can’t send any of their Diamond Rock Mine transport trucks to or from their Project, via Highway 33 and Ojai, at least until January 1, 2012.

     If, after that date, they do decide to send trucks to and from the Diamond Rock Mine via Highway 33 and the Ojai Valley, then a “Focused EIR” will be completed to analyze the potential impacts of Project generated traffic, noise and safety issues along State Highway 33, as well as an analysis of the Project’s impact upon air quality in Ojai. Additionally, and as part of this Focused EIR, the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) will be requested to provide a highway geometric study and analysis of State Highway 33 to determine the highway’s sightlines, grade and width.

The Collapse of 33 at Wheeler Gorge. Photo credit to Maureen & Dan Smith

     Troesh, together with the Stop The Trucks! Coalition, shall also request that Santa Barbara County cause to be prepared a “safety study” analyzing the potential safety impacts of Project-generated trucks traveling on State Highway 33 south of the Project, to and from the 101 Freeway. Various provisions to enhance enforcement of the prohibition are also part of the Agreement, including installation of a video surveillance system at the Diamond Rock Mine. Though Santa Barbara County would not commit, at this time, that a Focused EIR would be prepared, because of the controversial nature of the project, and following a request from Troesh Materials, Inc, the project applicant, we were assured by Santa Barbara County Council that such preparation is almost certain.

     In order to obtain the prohibition on trucks traveling up and down State Highway 33, as well as the commitment to ask for a Focused EIR and other protections, the Stop The Trucks! Coalition had to agree that no member of the Coalition or “any member of the public in Ojai participates in a lawsuit against Troesh Materials, Inc. and their Diamond Rock Mine, or directly or indirectly, contribute funds or cause funds to be contributed to any other legal challenge to them brought by any individual or entity.” While the Coalition can’t pretend to represent all of Ojai’s citizens, we nevertheless believe that agreeing and meeting such conditions would certainly be in Ojai’s best interest. Indeed, eliminating one source of untold numbers of huge, heavy, dangerous, diesel exhaust-spewing, double-cargo trailers filled with rock and gravel, and threatening all who drive or reside along State Highway 33 and Ojai, can only be considered a positive development, and serves as a precedent for future projects.

Left: (Gravel Truck Flips Over After Failing to Navigate a Turn on 33)

     Therefore, we strongly request that no one in Ojai contribute – directly or indirectly – to any lawsuit that likely will be brought by residents of the Cuyama Valley against the project. If such contributions are made, Troesh has the right to terminate the Agreement.

     Our Agreement with Troesh Materials, Inc. – in turn – allows the Coalition to now use its resources to continue mounting a successful legal battle against the next Rock and Gravel Mine project now wishing to send hundreds of their trucks through Ojai.

     The Ozena Ranch Mine project, located here in Ventura County, is now seeking a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to expand operations that could result in countless numbers of rock and gravel trucks going right through the heart of our town. Yes – the larger battle is far from over, but it is important that we’ve gained a temporary “cease-fire” with at least the operators of the Diamond Rock Mine – only one of several rock and gravel mines located above us in the Los Padres National Forest. Remember, all these rock and gravel mine projects would love to be able to send their own truck transports right through our town, and in the process, adversely impact Ojai’s character, ambiance, safety and health, and thus degrade our local economy. The Stop The Trucks! Coalition believes this is unacceptable to our community. Indeed, the Stop The Trucks! Coalition has already invested in a comprehensive Highway Safety & Geometric Study of our own, and we don’t believe that it is possible or probable to ever re-engineer State Highway 33 to make it an adequate or appropriate venue for large-scale industrial trucking.


Gravel Truck Stopped in Town. Photo credit to Daly Road Graphics

     While the Agreement is an important milestone for the Stop The Trucks! Coalition on behalf of the Ojai Valley and the Los Padres National Forest, many more battles await us as other rock and gravel mine applications move through the process of consideration by Ventura and Santa Barbara counties. 

     And this is why the Stop The Trucks! Coalition is counting on your continued support now, more than ever.      

     Again, in order to maintain the benefits of our Agreement with Troesh Materials, Inc., we ask that you not contribute to the Cuyama community’s proposed litigation against the Diamond Rock Mine project.

Thank you.

For the Stop The Trucks! Coalition – The Executive Committee:

Michael Shapiro – Chair
Howard Smith – Co-Chair
Tim Baird – Superintendent of Ojai Unified School System
Scott Eicher – CEO – Ojai Chamber of Commerce
Stan Greene
Dale Hanson
Therese Hartman
Jeff Kyper
– Executive Director – Los Padres Forest Watch
Carol Smith – Ojai City Council

 

 

 

HELP US  STOP THE TRUCKS!


     Send your donations to the Stop The Trucks! Coalition – c/o The Ojai Chamber of Commerce, P.O. Box 1134, Ojai, CA, 93024, or you may also walk your contribution into the Chamber’s offices anytime during the business week, at 201 S. Signal Street -- in the Ojai Festivals building -- in downtown Ojai.

By Michael Shapiro, Chairman / Stop The Trucks! Coalition

Repeating what I wrote last week in my Ojai Valley News Guest Editorial -- various news reports about the recent Santa Barbara-based Diamond Rock Mine didn’t tell the full story. It is simply not true that the Stop the Trucks! Coalition prevailed during the recent hearings before the Santa Barbara Planning Commission, and that’s why we’re appealing the decision of the Santa Barbara Planning Commission to approve the Diamond Rock Mine’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR). If we don’t, it paves the way for the granting of their Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and simultaneously strips-away any of Ojai’s legal rights to challenge them in the event that they “change their minds” and hundreds of rock and gravel mine-transport trucks end-up careening through Ojai after all.

Here’s what happened: In the interest of saving all parties great expense throughout any lengthy challenge and approval process, the Stop The Trucks! Coalition negotiated an agreement with the Diamond Rock Mine that we would not challenge their Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as long as they didn’t send mine truck transports through Ojai, and that the Stop The Trucks! Coalition maintained the rights to legally challenge them if they ever did. Unfortunately, not only did the Santa Barbara Planning Commission end-up approving the Diamond Rock Mine’s EIR, but it also granted them the freedom and flexibility to rely on that approval even if they sought to modify their CUP in order to “flip-flop” and send mine transport trucks up and down Route 33 and through Ojai at any time in the future, and there would be nothing that we could do to stop them.

Indeed -- unless their ruling is challenged and we win a reversal, Ojai and the Stop The Trucks! Coalition have been stripped of any rights to challenge and review their EIR and CUP as it relates to the health, safety, welfare and environmental havoc that such mine transport truck traffic through Ojai would cause. And this is why our appeal is so important. And although the appeal process will take time and lots of funding – we feel we have a good chance of prevailing as long as we continue to have your generous financial support to stay the course.

To compound the stresses and challenges now facing Ojai and the Stop The Trucks! Coalition, we’re now simultaneously facing an aggressive Ventura County-based mining operation – the Ozena Valley Ranch Rock & Gravel Mine – and what also appears to be a well-entrenched Ventura County Planning staff hell-bent on white-washing innumerable past CUP violations by the Ozena applicant and somehow granting them a renewed CUP and expanded production, regardless of those violations.

Please understand that we’ve not been handed any victory from anyone, and that several more rock and gravel mines remain waiting in the wings to join both Diamond Rock and Ozena – whom they may perceive are winning the rights to send any numbers of huge rock and gravel mine transports through Ojai with impunity.

The struggle to preserve the traditional ambiance, character, economy, environmental health, safety and welfare of Ojai is rapidly building to a critical mass, and if we are to prevail both legally, administratively and politically, we must continue to have your generous financial and political support. It’s obvious that our opponents aren’t interested in “good faith negotiations.” They’d rather mislead, and in the process, try to wear us down and cause us to spend more money and time than would otherwise be necessary. Well, now – let’s make it perfectly clear to our rock and gravel mine opponents that what’s “good for the goose, is also good for the gander!” And while I’m not implying that we would ever spend legal and consulting funds unwisely, we have to maintain the ability to prevail against their unscrupulous tactics.

I recall the management, consultants and even some Ventura County planning staffers also thinking that Ojai would end-up losing its ability to prevail against Waste Management’s huge Weldon Canyon garbage landfill project planned for the entrance to the Ojai Valley. We didn’t buckle then, and with your continued generosity and support now – we will prevail again in this latest and most onerous challenge to Ojai’s preservation as that example of a small, California town of yesteryear… a town who’s economy and environment is supported by education, the arts and tourism, and not rampant, destructive, dangerous and unhealthful industrialization -- which is exactly what massive gravel and rock mine transport trucking would end up causing.

Yes – we continue to count on your generous and ongoing financial support to STOP THE TRUCKS! now - as much as ever.

Send your donations to the Stop The Trucks! Coalition – c/o The Ojai Chamber of Commerce, P.O. Box 1134, Ojai, CA, 93024, or you may also walk your contribution into the Chamber’s offices anytime during the business week, at 201 S. Signal Street -- in the Ojai Festivals building -- in downtown Ojai.

For continuous updates on all the news regarding this issue, don’t forget to also log-on to the Ojai Post and “click” on “Stop The Trucks! Coalition.

Thanks so much.

Michael Shapiro
Chair – Stop The Trucks! Coalition

 

STOP THE TRUCKS: Mine Opponents Suspect Official Bias


In Thursday’s Ventura County Reporter, Editor Bill Lascher wrote: 

   “A broad coalition of Ojai residents, environmentalists, business owners, public officials and educators launched a blistering attack June 17 on county planners overseeing permits for mining operations.

     Ventura County Chief Executive Officer Marty Robinson confirmed county officials plan to discuss allegations in a letter sent by Stop the Trucks Coalition Vice-Chair Howard Smith about oversight of the controversial Ozena Valley Ranch mine.”

For the full story CLICK HERE.


Some further highlights:

     “Frustrated by what they perceive to be lax enforcement of planning regulations, Smith and his allies called for the ouster of a key Ventura County planning official for decisions related to the mine, which is located several miles north of Ojai, east of State Route 33.

     ‘We feel that the county has proven beyond any litmus test that they’re incapable of enforcing any violations,’ said Michael Shapiro, chairman of Stop the Trucks Coalition…”

     “The coalition says officials, particularly planning division manager Patrick Richards, have allowed Ozena to flaunt restrictions the county has placed on the mine. They claim Richards vastly undercounted weigh tickets from July and August 2007. Shapiro says their (time) stamps prove trucks traveled on Route 33 at restricted times in violation of the permit…”

     “We reviewed the same weigh tickets and time stamps as Mr. Richards but arrived at a completely different conclusion using the guidelines clearly set — and confirmed last year by county counsel and Division Director Kim Rodriguez,” Smith said in the letter.

     The coalition’s review, he said, revealed that more than 40 percent of the total truck trips (and 55% of those going through Ojai) violated Ozena’s conditional use permit…”

     “It would be an act of charity to say that after eight years of monitoring this conditional use permit, the planning division staff appears to suffer from a profound aversion to comprehending, implementing, monitoring and/or insuring compliance of this permit.”

     “The letter makes three demands: appoint an ombudsperson to review how planning officials handled Ozena’s permit, terminate the permit for violations the coalition claims are continuing, and that Richards be kept from this project and any dealing with Ojai.

     Shapiro said the fact the planning division is dependent on revenue from planning permit application fees creates an inherent conflict of interest…”

     “…Shapiro said he and his allies understand there is a need in the county for aggregate materials, but Ojai may be permanently threatened by “industrialization” of Highway 33…”

     “...’I know that it has been a contentious issue,’ Robinson said. ‘I have an obligation to take a look at this and respond’…”



OUR LETTER TO THE COUNTY CEO AND ALL FIVE COUNTY SUPERVISORS:

June 17, 2008

RE: "Investigation of Ozena Valley Ranch Mine, July & August 2007 Weigh Tickets & Billing Records"

Marty Robinson, CEO
County of Ventura
800 South Victoria Ave,
Ventura, CA 93009

Dear Ms. Robinson:

     Thank you for commissioning Tom Berg and his report on the operations of the Ventura County Resource Management Division. The Ojai Stop the Trucks! Coalition was grateful that we not only were able to provide input to the report but were also afforded the opportunity to present our views before the Board of Supervisors.

     In the wake of the comments made by each of the Supervisors, one would have imagined that the employees of the Resource Management Agency and the Planning Division would have gotten the message that when it comes to the administration and processing of C.U.P.'s, that county staff must deal with the issues of monitoring and compliance.

     Sadly, that does not seem to be the case. Last week our coalition received the attached letter from Patrick Richards. Please consider this letter our formal response and rejection of his May 29, 2008 "Investigation of Ozena Valley Ranch Mine July & August 2007 Weigh Tickets and Billing Records."

     According to Mr. Richards, he reviewed some two-months of weigh tickets and allegedly spotted so few violations that, in his words, they "were found to be inconclusive towards reviewing Condition No. 72 of CUP 5170."

    We reviewed the same Weigh Tickets and Time Stamps as Mr. Richards but arrived at a completely different conclusion using the guidelines clearly set – and confirmed last year by County Counsel and Division Director Kim Rodriguez – in Condition No. 72 of CUP 5170.

     We found that of the 649 weigh tickets reviewed, 476 were for trucks that used Route 33 north or south through Ojai and Casitas Springs. By our count over 268 -- or over 40% of the total, amounting to an astonishing 55% of those going through our valley -- were in apparent violation of Condition No. 72 of CUP 5170.

     It would be an act of charity to say that after eight years of monitoring this C.U.P., the Planning Division staff appears to suffer from a profound aversion to comprehending, implementing, monitoring and/or insuring compliance of this permit.

     With Mr. Richards seemingly using an apocryphal set of standards to evaluate compliance that have nothing to do at all with Condition No. 72 guidelines, is it any wonder that so many people – leaders from within Ojai’s elected and appointed city officials, the leadership of the Ojai Unified School District, the CEO of the Ojai Chamber of Commerce – and the thousands of regular citizens who constitute and support Ojai’s broadly represented Stop The Trucks! Coalition -- are so angry?

     Given that more than half of all mine transport truck trips through the Ojai Valley are in apparent violations of time constraints, this calls into question any recommendation made by the Planning Division to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors regarding Ozena over the past eight years. There is a an obvious need for an independent Ombudsman to not only undertake a further investigation into abuse of CUP 5170 by the permit holders, but also the very operation of compliance monitoring by the Planning Division as was called for by the Board of Supervisors on the day of Tom Berg's presentation.

     Mr. Richards, however practically precludes any further examination by quoting his supervisor, Kim Rodriguez, the Planning Division Director, who stated that the County will not retroactively enforce possible violations of Condition No. 72.

     Kim Rodriguez sent letters to Brian Bergman (the attorney for Ozena) and to Scott Eicher (at the time, the Chairperson of the “Stop the Trucks! Coalition") declaring that “although there was some past confusion among department staff as to the interpretation of the hours listed in the 2003 CUP Modification #1 of 2003, the Planning Division has determined that Condition 72 (Days and Hours of Operation) will be enforced using a strict and literal reading of the conditions which prohibit All Project Related Travel on Highway 33 between Casitas Springs and the City of Ojai on weekdays at any time other than 6:00am to 7:00 am and 9:00 am to 3:00 pm and Saturdays from 6:00 am to 5:00 pm.

     Ms. Rodriguez's decision to not retroactively enforce violations is, in itself, questionable. It is akin to a Police Department refusing to stop criminal behavior because patrol officers were ignorant of the law. Incompetence of staff is no excuse for justifying a unilateral decision to override the conditions of a C.U.P.

     Given what appears to be more than tacit approval of Mr. Richards' work by his superiors, we respectfully ask the following:


1) That you appoint an Ombudsman to investigate the entire handling of C.U.P. 5170 as well as the operation and behavior of Planning Division management and staff on this project.

2) That you take appropriate actions to begin the C.U.P. termination process for Ozena for what appears to be known and regular violations of the terms of their permit – violations that continue with impunity by virtue of all parties being fully well that the Planning Division thoroughly lacks the ability to engage in enforcement.

3) We believe that given Mr. Patrick Richards' judgments regarding oversight of the Ozena Ranch Mine project (some of which are detailed below) that he should be barred from having any further involvement with this project or any other involving Ojai.



     In reviewing the history of The Ozena Ranch Mine project, the original permit to operate the gravel mine was issued in 2001. Unfortunately for the citizens of Ojai, CEQA violations began immediately when the Division failed to establish reasonable standards for monitoring, compliance or enforcement.

     The next CEQA violation occurred in May of 2003, when Mr. Richards reviewed and approved a “Minor Modification of C.U.P. 5170 (1).” Although the restrictions on transit through Ojai were left unchanged, Mr. Richards signed off on an “Approval Letter” issued two weeks later, on June 13, 2003. In that letter the conditions are apparently modified significantly in the favor of the applicant -- the Virgilio Family -- without any public review or approval. In item #7 (3) of the Approval Letter, the limits of trucking through Ojai are redefined as follows: No change in trucks avoiding Highway 33 through the Ojai Valley between 7-9am and 3-5pm during weekdays.

     Although the C.U.P. itself calls for no trucks though Ojai after 3:00pm, the insertion of the phrase “3-5pm” created the illusion that trucks can now travel through Ojai unrestricted after 5:00pm, effectively tripling the hours of operation through the valley from 7 to 20 hours a day. This also had the effect of vastly increasing the income flowing into Ozena and to the Virgilio family, despite the fact that neither Mr. Richards nor the Planning Division violated CEQA guidelines by making such a modification without public input, awareness or review.

     All of this might have gone entirely unnoticed or treated as a mere typo except for several facts: First, as best anyone can confirm, after the 2005 slides on Route 33 above the Sespe Gorge were cleared, trucks began to run through Ojai as early as 2:30 am and well past the 3:00pm scheduled weekday cut off.

     It was then perhaps entirely ironic that when two gun stores -- one in Compton and one in the Ojai Valley – both owned by the same Virgilio family that operates the Ozena Ranch Mine facility -- were raided and closed by Federal agents of the ATF, resulting in a member of the Virgilio family apparently being convicted on charges related to illegally selling guns to known felons – that their rock and gravel mine operations began to more fully occupy the radar screens of a vast number of Ojai residents and civic leaders. Increased press coverage began to appear. In response to the rapidly growing complaints about Ozena’s trucks, Nao Braverman -- a reporter for the Ojai Valley News -- interviewed Ventura County Planning Division staff for an April 2007, article. Scott Ellison is quoted in that article as saying: “It has been difficult to monitor trucks violating their travel restrictions because there are several mines in the area that use gravel trucks, each with varying permit restrictions, and it has been almost impossible to identify which mines the trucks are coming from.”

     Given the Planning Division's claim that it is seemingly impossible to monitor C.U.P. compliance, the County had no business, under CEQA guidelines, approving the C.U.P. in the first place. Further, when pushed by public pressure to monitor the trucks, the Division came up with the ludicrous idea of “placards”, which are invisible at night when most violations occur, rather than suggesting ideas that might actually work, such as traffic cameras mounted at the “Y” in Ojai and on Route 33 near the mines.

     In an April 2, 2007 memo to Kim Rodriguez (Early Morning Trips, Ozena Valley Mine), Mr. Richards does mention that the Division had received a number of telephone complaints and 10 letters in which noise was listed as a serious problem. To date, those ten letters have never surfaced in any of our continuous Public Records Requests.

     Here’s a classic, telling example of how the Ventura County Planning Division deals with complaints regarding the mine trucking transports careening through the Ojai Valley during restricted time periods: A resident of Maricopa Highway north of Matilija Canyon submitted two complaints between 2005 and 2006. These complaints were either ignored or never investigated. To date, the submitter of these complaints has never received a response from the Planning Division. He has since filed a third complaint early this year but this has also failed to garner any response. By the way, copies of these complaints have been re-submitted to the Planning Division, the County Board of Supervisors and the press.

     Eventually – and perhaps in a face-saving effort which we believe was too little and too late – in response to a complaint that may have originated from the Ojai Valley Unified School District protesting that gravel trucks from Ozena were violating the schedule -- Scott Ellison made an appearance in Ojai in September of 2006. According to his case notes on file, ("Memorandum; Ventura County Planning Division, September 18, 2006) which we obtained last year during a Public Records Request, there were observations of seven violations by trucks from Ozena in the course of one week. In fact, if one reviews Mr. Ellison's charts (as Mr. Richards should have done) one finds that 9 of 16 trips, or nearly two-thirds of all trucks observed, were in apparent violation. Planning Division staff once again exhibited a profound lack of knowledge of Condition No. 72 of CUP 5170.

     Following-up on Ellison's report, Carole Aragon of the Planning Division wrote up a “Notice of Violation” that ignored most of the actual early morning violations and instead focused only on those during school black-out hours that Mr. Ellison reported. The mine was told to comply but no other disciplinary action or follow-up seems to have been taken to determine whether or not the Ozena Ranch Mine transports remained in compliance.

     Last year, when initially questioned about complaints in two Public Record Requests filed by Los Padres Forestwatch (a member of the Stop the Trucks! Coalition) Planning Division staff ignored the first request and then rebuffed the second, claiming that “Material that is not public record include copies of actual complaints, any enforcement files/notes, or proprietary information that could give competitors business insights into a project’s operational or financial activities.” That response was a clear violation of state law and it was only following our third request, made in our behalf by the law firm representing the Stop the Trucks! Coalition, and presented directly to Kim Rodriguez, that we finally obtained the documents originally requested months earlier.

     On January 25, 2007, the Planning Division prepared another memo entitled "Early Morning Truck Runs Through the Ojai Valley." That memo details the department's discussions about Ozena, but repeatedly misquotes the hours of truck restrictions through the Ojai Valley and continues to repeat the errors as if they were facts. In truth, all the memo does is memorialize the Planning Division's profound aversion to knowing and implementing the restrictions of the C.U.P.

     Mr. Richards further compounds and confirms the Division's lack of understanding of the C.U.P. conditions in that same April 2, 2007 memo to Kim Rodriguez noted above, by failing to accurately cite the restrictions on traffic through Ojai, instead stating only that there is much public hostility to the mine.

     On April 30, 2007 – responding in an email to Nao Braverman and myself – with copies forwarded to Patrick Richards and Kim Rodriguez, Manager of the Planning Division, as well as several other staff in Supervisor Bennett’s office and the City of Ojai, Scott Ellison repeats the canard worked into the 2003 Approval Letter.

“4. Since the operator can start loading trucks at 3:00 am now, empty trucks can be running north through the Ojai at 2:00 am and loaded trucks can be coming back through the Ojai by 4:00 am. The proposed project would move the start time to 4:30 am which shifts the empty trucks to 3:30 am and the full trucks to no earlier than 5:30. While the new start time is still early, it is later than the existing allowed time * we assume later is better than earlier.”

     In other words, the Planning Division treats their apocryphal schedule as a given and then goes out of its way to defend it in the press and public.

     Later that same day, April 30, Patrick Richards, “upon review of public comments…” issues a letter from the Planning Department announcing that the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is being withdrawn, to be replaced by a full EIR. He states:

     “The existing project has a 3:00am start time to load trucks. The MND indicates the project would have a 6:00am start time. However the applicant is requesting a 4:30am start time. This results in truck trips occurring earlier in the morning that are assumed in the MND. The impacts of these earlier trips have not been evaluated.”

     Mr. Richards’ statement seems innocuous enough except for the fact that the schedule on page 9 of the MND does not call for a 6:00am start. There is no evidence of a request to move it to 4:30am, nor would a supposed start time 1-1/2 hours later require an evaluation of impacts given that the impacts would be less.

     Once gain Mr. Richards is off the mark, but it gets worse…

     In August of 2007, Ojai resident John Broesamle (former president of the Ojai Valley Land Conservancy and supporter of the Stop the Trucks! Coalition) and I each filed written complaints. Mr. Broesamle’s complaint was said to be “lost” and remained without a response until he personally called the Division for a follow up, almost five months later, in January 2008. On the other hand, my complaint was summarily rejected by Pat Richards before he even evaluated case facts from a written response by John Hecht (environmental consultant to the Ozena Ranch Mine) submitted on August 30, 2007. Mr. Hecht's response and the enclosed weigh tickets raised additional questions about trucks running out of hours, weights being hand written and times being possibly manipulated. Mr. Richards inquired about these but never followed up. In February we requested a formal reopening of the process along with two months of weigh tickets and billing records. Four-months later, we were handed Mr. Richards' two-page "investigation" that we are now rejecting.

     Adding insult to injury, Kim Rodriguez, in her December 21, 2007 letter to Mr. Bergman, actually encouraged Ozena to appeal her ruling that the C.U.P. will be strictly enforce. Ms. Rodriguez was later over-ruled by County Counsel who determined that there can be no appeal because, in fact, what Ozena would be appealing is the very C.U.P. conditions that they, themselves, had already agreed to and had supposedly been operating under for eight years.

     Having been denied an appeal of the C.U.P., the lawyers for Ozena have now filed a "Verified Petition for a Writ of Mandamus," to get their conditions changed.

     Given the Division's history on this C.U.P., would it be out-of-line to wonder if, in fact, they were encouraged to do so by county officials? I sincerely hope not.

     None of this would amount to much except for the ongoing impacts to the Ojai Valley – which can not be reversed or repaired. The original C.U.P. expired in 2006. While its renewal is debated, the failures of the Planning Division to follow CEQA and properly monitor compliance have not only increased the number and hours of trucking, but have also increased onerous air and noise pollution; furthered road bed damage; diminished the quality of life and property values of all those who live along the Route 33 corridor; increased the odds of accidents on all stretches of Route 33; and opened up the County to civil liability and litigation. It is only due to the collapse of a portion of Highway 33 adjacent to Wheeler Hot Springs and the current economic down-turn that has more recently handed the Ojai Valley an unanticipated respite from any increase of mine truck transports degrading our environment, health and safety. However, the citizens of Ojai cannot continue to count on Mother Nature or domestic and/or world market conditions to preserve and safeguard our valley.

     The entire economy of the Ojai Valley is built upon three legs: Tourism, the Arts, and Education. Like a three-legged stool, if any one of these legs are degraded, there’s a profoundly negative effect on the entire structure. Turning the Ojai Valley into what would inevitably become a de facto industrial trucking transportation zone would have a catastrophic impact on our economy by threatening and degrading both the valley’s environmental health, its safety and welfare, and the overall ambiance that is the very foundation for why Tourism, Education and the Arts are the fuels that power our town’s economic well-being and way of life. This is why there is such wide-spread, grass-roots, civic and governmental support for keeping Ojai just the way it is. Indeed, if the numerous rock and gravel mines located in the Los Padres Forest and either now in operation or about to come on line wish to deliver their product throughout Ventura County, mandate that they take the alternative and safer route via Lockwood Valley Road connecting with the I-5 and Route 126 to the Ventura Freeway. If that is so mandated, this conflict will immediately evaporate.

     We respectfully ask you to immediately investigate this matter and to take all appropriate actions necessary. It has become painfully clear that neither the staff, administration of the Resource Management Agency or the Planning Division, are going to police themselves. The citizens of Ventura County should not have to suffer the burdens created by the intransigence and/or incompetence of public employees. 

Thank you.

 

 

PLANNING COMMISSION BANS GRAVEL TRUCK TRAFFIC ON SCENIC HIGHWAY 33 FROM DIAMOND ROCK MINE

Move Protects Ojai Valley and Los Padres National Forest From as Many as 138 Truck Trips Per Day

Concerns Remain Over Permanency of Ban and Other Proposed Mines in the Cuyama Valley

 

Left:  8:05 AM, turning from Signal St. onto Ojai Avenue, in front of the Movie Theater.


     Santa Maria, Calif. – Last week, a unanimous Santa Barbara County Planning Commission moved one step closer to permanently protecting the Ojai Valley, the Los Padres National Forest, and Scenic Highway 33 from as many as 138 daily gravel truck trips to and from the proposed Diamond Rock Mine in the Cuyama Valley. The Commission voted 4-0 to approve the Diamond Rock Sand and Gravel Mine and Processing Facility, planned for the remote Cuyama Valley in Santa Barbara County near the Ventura County Line.

     In approving the mine, the Commission voted to temporarily ban any gravel truck traffic on Route 33 through Ojai to and from that mine. The move comes in response to efforts by the Stop the Trucks Coalition, Los Padres ForestWatch, and hundreds of residents concerned about the health, safety, and environmental impacts of increased gravel truck traffic along this narrow two-lane mountain road.

     “At least for the time being, this ban gives us partial relief from our legitimate, ongoing concerns that turning Scenic Highway 33 and the town of Ojai into an industrialized heavy trucking transportation zone would have significant and lasting impacts on both the air quality of the Ojai Valley while also unnecessarily risking the lives, health, safety and welfare of the thousands of folks who use this route,” said Michael Shapiro, chair of the Stop the Trucks! Coalition.

     “We’re pleased that the County and the applicant finally recognized what we’ve been saying all along – that Scenic Highway 33 is not suitable as an industrial trucking route,” said Jeff Kuyper, executive director of Los Padres ForestWatch, a nonprofit organization working to protect the national forest and an active participant in the Stop the Trucks Coalition. “The wild landscapes, quiet solitude, and scenic vistas of the Los Padres National Forest are safe for now.”

     When initially proposed in 2006, the mine applicants proposed to send as many as 138 daily truck trips to and from the mine along Scenic Highway 33 through the Ojai Valley and the Los Padres National Forest. The trucks would rumble along the narrow, winding mountain road, passing directly by popular swimming holes, campgrounds, hiking trails, wilderness areas, and a ten-mile stretch of Sespe Creek, recommended for protection under the federal Wild & Scenic Rivers Act. Once in Ojai, the trucks would pass by hundreds of residences and several schools in this small valley whose economy is heavily dependent on tourism.

     When added to existing truck traffic, this truck traffic would have resulted in one truck every four minutes during peak production, according to the Environmental Impact Report for the mine.

     However, in approving Condition 34 to the mine’s permit, the Commission effectively avoided these significant impacts. Condition 34 bans all truck traffic from the Diamond Rock mine, stating: “Truck traffic to and from the Diamond Rock project site shall be prohibited through Ojai,” including the Los Padres National Forest. The condition also specifies that these trucks shall not be re-routed in other directions, essentially resulting in a 20% decrease in mining operations.

     The Diamond Rock mine must still secure permits from other state and federal agencies. There is also a ten-day period following yesterday’s Commission action for project opponents, including residents of the Cuyama Valley, to appeal the project based on groundwater, air pollution, and quality of life issues.

     While celebrating this hard-fought victory, ForestWatch and the Coalition remain concerned that the mining company can apply to lift the trucking ban anytime in the future. ForestWatch and the Coalition will continue to demand that the ban remains permanent as the project winds its way through the County appeal process.

     “We believe that the environmental impact report fails to adequately analyze Highway 33 to determine its long-term safety and efficacy for wide spread industrial utilization,” said Michael Shapiro, chair of the Stop the Trucks! Coalition. “Until and unless the current EIR establishes a permanent ban on such utilization – with adequate redress if such a ban is ever lifted – the Coalition will remain proactive in opposing any such utilization, anytime in the future.”

     In addition to Diamond Rock, two existing sand and gravel mines also on the Cuyama River – the Ozena Sand & Gravel mine and the GPS River Rock Products mine – are seeking to dramatically expand their operations, as well as one new mine just downstream of the Diamond Rock facility. If approved, these mines could send hundreds of additional trucks through Ojai and the Los Padres National Forest. Hearings and environmental documents for these mines are scheduled to begin later this summer.

Contact: Michael Shapiro, Stop the Trucks Coalition, (805) 889-7105
Jeff Kuyper, ForestWatch, (805) 617-4610 x11

 

http://www.independent.com/news/2008/may/22/gravel-haulers-prohibited-through-ojai-los-padres/


Gravel Haulers Prohibited Through Ojai, Los Padres
Trucks Brake for Highway 33

By Chris Meagher
Thursday, May 22, 2008

     The main artery through Ojai, State Route 33 sits in western Ventura County, just a few miles from the Santa Barbara County border. Along Route 33 sit schools, hospitals, shopping malls, and Ojai’s busiest intersection. What it will not accommodate—to the relief of many Ojai residents—is the daily rumbling of hundreds of semi trucks carrying thousands of pounds of gravel to construction sites throughout Santa Barbara and Ventura counties. Those residents can thank officials at Troesh Materials, Inc.—owners of the new Diamond Rock mine in Santa Barbara County’s Cuyama Valley—and, in part, the Santa Barbara County Planning Commission.

     When the Planning Commission first saw proposals for Diamond Rock in July 2007, Troesh planned 138 daily trips hauling gravel and sand south on Route 33 through Ojai. The project spent a year being tweaked by the state Office of Mine Reclamation, and, in approving it on May 14, the Planning Commission agreed with operating-condition compromises Troesh offered to make for Diamond Rock — namely, eliminating the daily parade of gravel trucks through Ojai as well as parts of the Los Padres National Forest on Route 33. The loss of these southbound trips means that production will be cut by 20 percent because, in effect, mine operations are controlled by the number of truck trips each day. The Planning Commission didn’t ban all traffic out of the mine, however. Now, 72 trucks a day, and 110 under peak conditions, will be taking a different route away from the mine. They’ll either head north on Highway 33 to hit Interstate 5 for Los Angeles or continue north to Highway 166 toward Santa Maria. Even under the highest levels of service, these highways will not suffer the impacts that Route 33 would.

     But it does stop them, for now, from heading south on Route 33, a single-lane mountain highway that can be dangerous for trucks pulling two trailers, each containing 60,000-80,000 pounds of gravel. “The Highway 33 corridor is not suitable for these big trucks,” said 1st District Planning Commissioner Michael Cooney, who—along with three other planning commissioners—voted to approve the project. Michael Shapiro of the Stop the Trucks Coalition, citing the air quality impact on the health, safety, and welfare of those living or traveling near Route 33, said industrial traffic through Ojai would have had a palpable and “scary” impact on residents, creating an industrial feel that could potentially harm the valley’s income from its reputation for arts and tourism. “It [would have] totally, adversely affected the economy,” Shapiro said. Jeff Kuyper, executive director of ForestWatch, a watchdog group dedicated to preserving and protecting Los Padres National Forest, also expressed concern about the trips down Route 33, pointing out that the trucks would have passed by campgrounds, swimming holes, and other popular wilderness areas in their routes.

     The ban isn’t permanent, however. For this reason, some suggested the Environmental Impact Report only be partially certified. They worried that certification of the entire EIR would appear to approve the parts of the EIR that did discuss the truck travel now eliminated through Ojai in case Troesh officials change their mind. “We believe that the Environmental Impact Report fails to adequately analyze Highway 33 to determine its long-term safety and efficacy for wide-spread industrial utilization,” said Shapiro, who said he plans to appeal the decision to the Santa Barbara Board of Supervisors. “Until and unless the current EIR establishes a permanent ban on such utilization — with adequate redress if such a ban is ever lifted—the Coalition will remain proactive in opposing any such utilization,” Shapiro said. Should Troesh choose to pursue truck traffic on Route 33, county officials said the EIR would then have to be updated to address new impacts, and affected residents and groups would have to be informed of the change. Thus, the commissioners approved the EIR.

     Diamond Rock is one of three potential mining operations in the county along the Cuyama River. General Production Services (GPS) has been mining north of the Diamond Rock site for decades. Officials are proposing to relocate its digging pit because its current hole is not refilling with enough high-quality material, and an EIR is expected this summer. As part of its new proposal, GPS’s production rate will decrease or stay the same, and the company has indicated it will cease sending the 10 to 12 truck trips it has historically sent down Route 33. To the north of GPS is a project by Richards Holding Company. The application for that mining project is not complete, and a Planning Commission hearing wouldn’t come until 2009. The company has not yet agreed to any restrictions.

 

 

April 22, 2008   Howard Smith speaks to Rotary Ojai-West

    The coalition has pushed a deal with the asphalt plant in Santa Paula.  They promise not to drive their trucks through our town.

     The Santa Barbara Planning commission will likely ban trucks coming south through Ojai.

     However, the Ventura County Planning Commission, in a surprise move, announced that they will allow the Ozena Mine to haul scrap concrete "up the mountain" for processing, and back down again.  This on a three-month "trial basis", for CalTrans.

     "We think this is a huge violation of their permit," said Coalition member Howard Smith.  "There's a conflict at the county as to what they can and cannot do.  Our lawyers are talking to their lawyers to get that blocked.  We are also trying to get them to turn over scores of documents that we've requested."

     "This may go to court in the near future," Howard said.


Above: 

A tandem squeezes up the Dennison Grade, after driving through Ojai en route to the upper Ojai and Santa Paula.

 

When is a truck not a truck?   When it's A-wanderin'.
Sometimes they get lost and take the scenic route through Ojai.


     I've spotted the tandems in unlikely places, and yesterday I decided to follow one with my camera. I picked it up northbound at the intersection of Foothill and El Paseo, a block north of E. Ojai Ave. Apparently, he missed the turn north at the "Y".


     He went north on Foothill past startled pedestrians, until the intersection of Foothill and Fairview. 

 


A sign there says no outlet, and since there is no room to turn around on narrow residential streets, he turned onto Fairview and hoped for the best.

 


Over hill and dale westward, until he came across 33, and headed south. 
--Ray Smith

 

Stop the Trucks: Route 33 & The Damage Done
(All pictures are courtesy of Maureen and Dan Smith, Wheeler Hot Springs)


     In July of 2007, as reported in the Ojai Valley News, CalTrans District 7 investigators concluded in a now controversial traffic study that State Route 33 is maintained to provide safe travel for all motorists, and is designed to accommodate large trucks.

     In February of 2008 a portion of Route 33 collapsed into the river. Below are a dozen photographs of the damage done, indicating the collapse was far more significant than originally reported.

     According to the study of the roadway geometry last year, CalTrans found the roads to be in very good condition.

     In a letter from Doug Failing, CalTrans District 7 Director, to Supervisor Bennett, the CalTrans chief concluded, "As long as trucks and vehicles abide by the existing regulatory and warning signage, the travel through the subject corridor can safely accommodate the design envelope of the 'California Legal' truck."

     The collapsed portion of Highway 33 will take several months to repair, according to CalTrans

     Recent OVN stories quote CalTrans officials that "Years of erosion by the creek below caused the slope underneath the road to give way, and the part of the road to collapse"

     The Stop the Trucks coalition has repeatedly questioned whether the vulnerable road should be open to heavy gravel trucks. The Coalition has also wondered why the possibility of such a failure,had not been predicted during the CalTrans study of the safety of the mountainous portion of Highway 33.

     The study of the Highway from the five points intersection through Pine Mountain and its descent into Lockwood Valley, released at the end of May 2007, after taking over three months to complete, determined that, according to CalTrans, the road was indeed safe for all motorists.

     Maria Raptis, spokesperson for CalTrans District 7 said that the study had focused exclusively on the geometric design of the road for safe and orderly movement of vehicles. According to CalTrans engineers it did not focus on the stability of the roads or the hydraulics."

     When the "Study" was concluded last year, mining advocates and some County Planning officials in both Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties cited the study to reinforce their positions.


     Scott Ellison, a planner with the Ventura County Planning Division that issued the Conditional Use Permit for the Ozena Mine was quoted in the Ventura County Reporter last year as saying, “They concluded it was safe for the trucks, as long as they followed the posted limitations.” Ellison added that CalTrans examined the “radius of the turns, the way the turns are sloped — road geometrics, looking at the height of the tunnels, for instance, blind curves, these sorts of things. They felt the road geometrics were safe for the trucks. As a local agency we’re not likely to challenge a CalTrans safety study that’s two weeks old that looks at the road segment we’re interested in.”

     Gary Kaiser, the Santa Barbara County Planner who led the drafting of the 2007 staff report on the proposed Diamond Rock Mine apparently thought so little about the safety issues related to Route 33, that they were practically ignored in his draft.

     By way of contrast, Michael Shapiro, the current chair of "Stop the Trucks," wrote in an op ed piece last summer:

     "After months of stalling, CalTrans has responded to Ojai’s request for a safety study of Route 33, finally releasing six-pages to conclude that the highway is, in fact, safe and appropriate for heavy, large-scale, industrial trucking. Taking its cue from the industry and industry lobbyists who desired that finding - without regard to the health, safety and welfare of the people here in the Ojai Valley - the CalTrans “study” is a patently outrageous travesty and a whitewash."

You be the judge, Ojai…

 

2008 Ozena Analysis
January 27, 2008

 Executive Summary:  

     Over the past few weeks we have received and reviewed numerous documents and reports relating to the Ozena Valley Mine Project that have a direct bearing on the viability and legal status of this C.U.P.

     This analysis is aimed at giving a preliminary overview of the entire project as it impacts the citizens of the Ojai Valley.

     It is the belief of this author based on the analysis that follows that the Ozena Valley Mine has been in repeated and regular non-compliance with the existing C.U.P. and that the documentation previously used to assess compliance fails to meet any legal standard of sufficiency.

     This analysis concludes that based on this preliminary review there appears to be good cause to terminate the existing C.U.P. and deny the application for a further modification.

     What we find is numerous inconsistencies in many of the following, including: 

1)  The application for a project modification;
2)
  The manner in which the Ozena Mine operators have interpreted the existing regulations and guidelines;
3)
  The manner in which the Ozena operators report compliance with those guidelines;
4)
The documentation alleging compliance that has been provided to the Ventura County Planning Division;
5)
  And the analysis of that documentation provided by the mine operator in regards compliance. 

 There is also a question about ownership rights: 
6) Does the current applicant, Tony Virgilio, have the legal right to make this application due to the death of the purported owner of the land and mine, Mike Virgilio.  As of January 24, 2008, no one at the Planning Division had seen any legal documents indicating who might be the rightful heirs to the land to which the CUP is attached. 

     Without proper documentation there is no way to know who rightfully speaks for the new owner(s) and that owner(s) could theoretically be anyone, from the proverbial “Aunt Tilley in Topeka,” to Mike’s son, Stephen.  Stephen Virgilio was arrested last year after an ATF raid on his father’s gun stores in Compton and Oak View on a federal criminal complaint that alleges Stephen sold firearms and ammunition to straw buyers who were purchasing the weapons on behalf of convicted felons and other prohibited persons.

     Our legal consultants are of the opinion that the Planning Division should cease all communications with anyone who purports to represent the mine operation until such time as their legal authority to do so is established and properly confirmed in writing. 

7) Has the applicant, who is also proposing to excavate a new pond, effectively tripling the size of their mining operation as part of an Aquaculture CUP, complied with both the existing 2005 agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game and the terms of the CUP?  According to Natasha Lohmus of that department in a January 22, 2008 email, “We are going to go over the reveg plan and why they did not comply last year.” 

 A list of all the documents reviewed and/or referenced is at the end of this analysis.

 

 Analysis:

      In Kim Rodriguez’s response letter of January 17, 2008 to Scott Eicher of “Stop the Trucks,” she makes several key declarations and acknowledgements. First that although there was some past confusion among department staff as to the interpretation of the hours listed in  the 2003 CUP Modification #1 of 2003, the Planning Division has determined that Condition 72 (Days and Hours of Operation) will be enforced using a strict and literal reading of the conditions which prohibit “All Project Related Travel on Highway 33 between Casitas Springs and the City of Ojai on weekdays at any time other than 6:00am to 7:00 am and 9:00 am to 3:00 pm and Saturdays from 6:00 am to 5:00 pm.

      Ms. Rodriguez goes on further to indicate that if Ozena was in regular and routine violation of the CUP that the Department would take appropriate action against the mine, beginning with a hearing before the Planning Commission to either modify, suspend, or revoke the permit for cause.  If corrective action were not taken it is unlikely that the Planning dependent staff would recommend approval of the CUP Modification Request to the Planning Commission.

      The Planning Division implements reasonable and feasible conditions that can be enforced and uses techniques that are considered the best to fulfill that objective.

     In Ms. Rodriguez’s September 27th letter to Howard Smith (prepared by Pat Richards) the department denies Mr. Smith’s complaint (and that of John Broesamle) of early morning and late afternoon CUP truck violations by citing the weigh tickets provided to the Planning Department by Ozena. 

     Weigh tickets, created and distributed by the mine operators appear to be the sole tool used by the department to monitor truck traffic.

     The real question then is simply this:  Are the weigh tickets a valid and reliable tool for this purpose?

     After an analysis of the weigh tickets found in the Division’s Ozena Complaint File, we believe the use of self-prepared weigh tickets is not valid.  It is a method in which the results seemingly can be manipulated at will by the mine operator and may result in fraud or misrepresentation of the facts.

     For example: For August 14th, John Hecht of West Coast Environmental & Engineering working on behalf of the applicant provided the department with a list of 11 trips and their respective weigh tickets. 

 (It should be noted that Hecht and West Coast also prepared all the analysis of the Troesh Diamond Rock Mine Proposal in Santa Barbara.)

      The first three tickets, items 11118, 11119 and 11120 had punch clock times indicating that all three 80,000 pound double hopper gravel trucks were:

 1)  All weighed empty;
 2)  Filled manually by a skip loader;
 
3)  And then weighed again within three minutes of each other.

Even a casual observer would probably conclude this is a physical impossibility. 

 4)  Also, the amount of gravel loaded in 11118 and 11119 was in both cases, exactly 57,540 pounds.  Getting a skip loader to fill twin hoppers on two separate trucks down to the identical pound is also probably a physical impossibility. 

 5)  In the afternoon we have the same issue with two trucks, tickets 11127 and 11128.  Both had punch clock times indicating that both 80,000 pound double hopper gravel trucks were weighed empty; filled manually by a skip loader and then weighed again with in two minutes of each other. Both come up with an identical gross weight to the very pound, 80,000 each.  Again the odds of this occurring are virtually impossible, especially given that one truck was supposedly loaded with 3/8ths gravel and the other with 1” rock.

 6)  On ticket 11122 we have the weights being “Hand Written” in instead of being punch stamped as on the other ten tickets.

 7)  It appears then that the information on these weigh tickets can be manipulated at will by the mine operator.  Clearly they fail the test as the evidentiary basis for any claims, pro or con. 

 8)  Furthermore, we have no evidence that these were all the tickets for that day.  In his cover letter to Pat Richards, Mr. Hecht carefully parses his words to say “…please find attached weigh tickets from August 14, 2007.”  Although Hecht then claims that all of the trips for the tickets he did enclose fall within the approved hours of operation, he makes no claim that these were the only tickets for that day. 

 9)  We have no evidence from the day before or the day after to review the sequence of numbers and no way of confirming that these 11 trips were the only ones on August 14th. 

 10)  Finally, a reasonable person might conclude that there is no way the Planning Division could have adequately determined whether the observations that Mr. Broesamle and Mr. Smith independently made that day were correct or not. 

 11)  Despite the fact that the gravel truck issue is a highly contentious one, the dismissal of the complaints by two highly respected citizens was clearly unfounded and casts aspersion on their respective characters.

 12)  Given that the very fate of the Ozena permit and renewal rests in part upon the question of whether or not there are in violation of their existing CUP, the use of highly suspect weigh tickets is not only debatable but fails to meet any reasonable legal standard.

 13)  Concerns about the Ozena operation were previously raised by Howard Smith in his June letter to Chief Deputy DA Jeffrey Bennett when he asked for an investigation into possible criminal behavior.

      In his response to Mr. Smith’s complaint, DA Bennett took the same position that Ms. Rodriguez stated above, that the schedule in item 72 was to be interpreted strictly.  Trucks outside the stated times would clearly be in violation.

 14)  Although County officials have been rather clear about this to date, it appears from various correspondence and permit applications that Ozena continues to interpret these rules differently, so differently in fact that they may well have been operating in regular and continuous violation of the CUP all along. 

 15)  Again, let’s go back to the weigh tickets of August 14, 2007.  In his analysis of John Hecht’s letter of September 11, 2007, and the accompanying 11 weigh tickets, Mr. Richards astutely notices that four of the 11 trips that day (36% of the trips) likely had to pass through Ojai either coming or going to the mine during restricted hours. 

 (Again, think about this, 36% of the trips on a day when supposedly only 11 trips were made and documented, were in possible violation.)

 This is in addition to the five truck trips going north that day between 3 am and 5 am, and the three truck trips witnessed that afternoon by Mr. Smith; and the two double hopper trucks witnessed by Mr. Broesamle near the mine between 3:30 am and 6:30 am on the 14th.

 Mr. Richards writes to Mr. Hecht and asks for an explanation. 

 16)  Mr. Hecht’s response of October 10, 2007, is not only enlightening into the thinking of the Ozena operators, he also lays the ground work for the proposals in the recently received CUP Modification Request #2 that essentially dismisses the existing guidelines.  His remarks can only been seen as misguided and in clear violation of Condition #72.

 16-a)  In his first paragraph, Mr. Hecht asserts that in regards Condition 72, that he believes that the only conditions imposed are “are directional.  (i.e. traffic is only restricted southbound between 7 and 9 in the morning and northbound after 3 pm.)

 Hecht goes on in his next paragraph to assert this “directional” defense for both the possible morning and afternoon trips. 

 16-b)  In the CUP Modification #2 that was just received, Hecht guts the old Condition #72 and replaces it with his “directional” language, which he describes as merely a “clarification.”

 16-c)  In his second defense of these probable violations, he also repeats another canard, that Ozena has no control over the truckers who come to the mine – this despite that fact that elsewhere Ozena acknowledges that most of its regular daily deliveries are transported by either Valley Bulk trucks to the batch plant in Oxnard or by Swader Trucking for local Ojai delivers.  Given that these are regular ongoing contracts, it stretches credibility to say any business can not influence the firms that come and deliver it’s product on a daily basis for what is now almost seven straight years.

 The applicant even directly contradicts himself and goes so far as to assert control over trucks when he states in Condition #5.1 of the Modification #2: “Therefore, the Applicant is proposing to limit AM deliveries through Ojai such that no more than 8 trucks will be loaded during that time that will pass through the Ojai Valley to the south.  All trucks passing through Ojai during this time will be of a recent model year with low noise characteristics.”

 16-d)  In his third defense of Ozena’s possible violations, Hecht then, incredulously attempts to cite Google Maps as a source for the length of time it takes for an 80,000 double hopper gravel truck to travel the 46+ miles from the mine to the end of Casitas Springs (the restricted zone).  Hecht uses a time of 1 hour and 11 minutes; which ignores the fact that you have huge trucks coming down a mountain road with over a dozen hairpin turns followed by heavy traffic and stop lights in the Ojai Valley itself.

 This contradicts an internal Planning Division memo of January 25th, 2007 in which a member of the Planning Division actually drove up and down the mountain in a car – not a fully loaded truck – and ascertained that it would require a minimum of one hour and 30 minutes to make that same trip.  The time differences are significant as it would have put those last two trips of August 14th in the Ojai Valley during restricted times – and that’s presuming the weigh tickets were accurate, a fact we can clearly no longer take for granted.  Those may well have been the trips spotted that day by Mr. Smith.

 16-e)  That same memo of January 25th also notes that Tony Virgilio contracts with “Valley Bulk” to ship to a batch plant in Oxnard daily and that Valley Bulk typically assigns between 3 and 5 trucks to make THREE round trips between Ozena and Oxnard every day.

 Do the math: If the run from Casitas Spring to Oxnard is another half hour, then one could safely calculate that travel alone one way from Ozena to the mine takes in excess of two hours with round trips taking four hours.  Three trips a day per truck equates to 12 hours per day per truck and that does not include time to load, unload, lunch, refueling or even bathroom breaks.  There is no way Ozena can legally be doing this day in and day out for many years without having trucks violating the restricted hours, which come to only seven per day.

 16-f)  Hecht’s fourth defense is to then claim that the Planning Department staff have agreed and approved his interpretation of his first defense, that of directional limits only. He tries to bolster this claim by citing “verbal concurrence from staff” and work on an early draft of the CUP Modification #2 that were discussed but – importantly – never approved that would have allowed trucks to travel north in violation of Condition #72.

 16-g) Hecht’s fifth defense is also somewhat specious. He claims that when the mine was cited for violations in 2006, they were not cited for all the violations they had in fact incurred – which is a bit like a criminal committing “Assault and Battery” while committing a “Robbery” but only being charged for “Robbery” and acting as if laws against “Assault and Battery” no longer apply to him in the future.

 16-h)  Last but most important of all is Hecht’s sixth defense and here in lies the crux of the entire matter.  He states in that October letter, “The applicant has relied on the county’s staff’s previous actions and interpretations in operating the project.  If staff positions on Condition 72 changes and the limitations become absolute and bi-directional, it will severely harm the applicant and render this project un-economic.”

 Conclusions & Action Steps:

 A)  Not only is Ozena trying to shift blame onto the department for any possible non-compliance, they have clearly put themselves in a double bind:   

 B)  If Ozena has been running a successful and economically viable operation for seven years without violating the terms of the CUP, there is no need for them to expand the scope of their operations or change the limitations on hours as proposed in the new Modification #2.

 C)  If on the other hand they have been economically viable only because they have been interpreting the CUP in their own (and unjustified) manner), then it is clear that they have been in violation of the terms of the original CUP and Modification #1 and they should have their permit terminated and the request for Modification #2 denied.

 D)  Based on this analysis and prior to any Planning Division EIR of Modification #2, there should be a thorough, open and public  investigation of whether or not Ozena has in fact complied with the existing CUP conditions. 

 E)  The review should include at a minimum 2 continuous months worth of weigh tickets and billing records for the same time period.  Preferably these tickets should be from July and August of 2007 and should specifically include the days immediately before and after the August 14th Complaints.  Although we have raised serious questions about the credibility of the weigh tickets, obtaining two months worth along with financial data such as billing records for the same time period should enable a credible analyst to determine if in fact there was true compliance.

 F)  If in fact the operators are found to be out of compliance, proceedings should be initiated to immediately suspend their current permit and deny their request for Modification #2 and the Aquaculture CUP.

 G)  There should be a review by Planning Division staff and County Counsel, if needed, to assess the ownership rights of Tony Virgilio.  If found lacking, the permits should be denied.

 H)  There should be a review by California Fish and Game to determine compliance with that agreement and again, if found lacking all permits should be terminated and/or denied.

 I)  Should the Mine be found in compliance then better means for reasonable and feasible monitoring of the mine operation must be implemented at the operator’s cost.  This should include cameras not only at the mine but also in Casitas Springs, in Ojai and at the junction of Lockwood Valley Road and Route 33. Cameras should be accessible online by the public with digital back ups for every day archived by the County for later review.  Under no circumstances should the cameras be under the control of the operator.

 J)  The “Stop the Trucks” Coalition should be prepared to take whatever steps are necessary, including legal action to insure that a full review as noted in B) – H) occur as soon as possible and prior to any other consideration of the Ozena permits.

 

 Documents Review and those Cited Above:

 1)         Letter, January 17,2008, from Kim Rodriguez, Planning Director of the Ventura County Planning Department, to Scott Eicher, Chair of the “Stop the Trucks” in response to the Coalition’s 15 questions to the department.

 2)         Letter, October 10, 2007, from John Hecht, President of West Coast Environmental and Engineering on behalf of the Ozena Mine, to Patrick Richards, Manager of the Commercial Industrial Section of the Ventura County Planning Department in response to Mr. Richards letter of September 11, 2007.

 3)         Letter, September 11, 2007 from Patrick Richards to John Hecht asking for clarification of Hecht’s response to Alleged Violations of the CUP on August 14, 2007.

 4)         Letter, August 30, 2007 from Hecht to Richards in response to alleged violations of the CUP 5170.

 5)         Letter, September 27, 2007, from Kim Rodriguez but signed by Patrick Richards to Howard Smith in response to his complaint regarding the Ozena CUP on August 14, 2007.

 6)         Letter, August 19, 2007, from Howard Smith, Ojai resident, to Kim Rodriguez, complaining about possible CUP violations on August 14, 2008.

 7)          Complaint Form, August 17, 2007 by John Broesamle, Ojai resident to the Planning Department regarding possible CUP violations on August 14, 2008.

 8)          Letter, September 13, 2007, from Ventura County Chief Deputy District Attorney, Jeffrey Bennett to Howard Smith about allegations of possible criminal activities in regards the Ozena CUP.

 9)          Letter, June 23, 2007, from Howard Smith to Jeffrey Bennett, about allegations of possible criminal activities in regards the Ozena CUP.

 10)        CUP 5170 Modification Request Number 2, January 2, 2008, submitted by Tony Virgilio and prepared by West Coast Environmental & Engineering.

 11)        CUP 5170 Modification Number 1 of June 13, 2003.

 12)         Planning Division Memo, “January 25, 2007, “Early Morning Truck Runs Through the Ojai Valley,”

 13)         Agreement Memo, December 19, 2005, California Department of Fish and Game, 1600-2005-254-R5

 14)        CUP Request, January 2, 2008, Ozena Valley Ranch Aquaculture, LU04-0072

 15)        E-mail, January 22, 2008, from Natasha Lohmus, Environmental Scientist, CA. Dept of Fish & Game to Steve Offerman at the request of “Stop the Trucks”

 

 

Ojai, CA 93023
W:805-278-3645
August 19, 2007

Kim Rodriguez, Planning Director
County of Ventura
Planning Division
800 South Victoria Ave,
Ventura, CA 93009

Dear Kim Rodriguez:

     Please consider this letter my formal complaint regarding C.U.P violations in the operation of gravel trucks in conjunction with the Ozena Valley Sand and Gravel Mine owned and operated by Michael Virgilio of Huntington Beach, California.

     Ozena’s violations are on such a massive level, that we believe that their permit should be immediately rescinded.

     In the Ozena C.U.P. from 2003, Item #72 specifically set “Days & Hours of Operation.”  All project related travel on Highway 33 between Casitas Springs and the City of Ojai (Mon. – Fri) was restricted to 6:00am to 7:00am and from 9:00am to 3:00pm.  Total hours of all truck hours through Ojai come to seven hours.  On Saturday trucking is limited from 6:00am to 5:00pm, a total of 11 hours.

     On Monday, August 14th of this year, I personally witnessed multiple violations of the C.U.P. on at least three separate occasions. 

      Round One: I was awoken by a gravel truck heading north through Ojai on Route 33 just north of El Roblar at 2:55am.  Staying awake for the next two hours I saw four more heading north.  Two were of the red and white type that Valley Bulk uses with Ozena.  The others were the double hopper dump truck style used by Ortiz Trucking and Cardenas Trucking.  My observations of these trucks were later confirmed by John Broesamly  of Ojai, who spent the early hours of the morning truck spotting just outside the Ozena facility in Cuyama.

     Round Two: Leaving Ojai at 7:00am via Route 33 South on my way to work in Oxnard I saw one loaded truck from Cardenas heading south and spotted three more heading north.  Two were Valley Bulk, the other was from Ortiz.  These vehicles were all in violation of the next blackout period (7-9am).

     Round Three: On my way home from work,  I entered Casitas Springs at 3:45pm and spotted one empty truck from Cardenas heading north and saw two more loaded double hopper type trucks heading south. These trucks were of the style used by Ozena in their own website photos which apparently have absolutely no corporate markings on them, a seemingly common practice.  These were also during a black out period for Ozena, which is not allowed to ship in either direction through Ojai after 3:00pm on weekdays.

      Although these violations were recorded on a single day, in fact they could have been recorded on any single weekend since Route 33 was reopened after the Day Fire. 

     Despite the fact that since March of 2007, the Ojai “Stop the Trucks” Coalition has sent over 35 public letters and emails to Mr. Ellison and that there have been over 25 news stories about the gravel truck situation, the department has apparently informed Supervisor Bennett that there has only been one complaint against Ozena last year and that it was supposedly investigated. 

     These news stories have appeared in the LA Times, the Ventura County Star, the Ojai Valley News, the Pacific Coast Business Times, the Ventura Reporter, the Santa Barbara News Press, the Santa Barbara Independent,; and the Santa Maria Times.  Additionally the Ventura Planning Department staff was sent copies of over 350 letters complaining about trucks that were originally sent to the Santa Barbara Planning Commission along with a copy of an Ojai City Council meeting in January of 2007 in which dozens of citizens complained about truck operations.

     That any intelligent public employee would consider Ozena’s violations non-existent, minimal or a non-issue, is too ludicrous to be given any credibility at all.  That, we the citizens of the Ojai Valley are forced to do the monitoring of a permit issued by the County, also borders on the absurd.   

     The constant violation of the hours of trucking has created an intolerable situation for the residents of the Ojai Valley.  It has increased the not only the number and hours of trucking, but has potentially increased air pollution and noise pollution; diminished the quality of life and property values of all those who live along the Route 33 corridor; increased the odds of accidents on all stretches of Route 33; perhaps inflated the profits of Mr. Virgilio and possible others and opened up the County to civil liability lawsuits.

     Further, the Ozena mining operation is now in ongoing and massive violation of their C.U.P. for regularly running trucks at hours outside the limits.  There exists no reason for them to even be in business now while they are awaiting the EIR process.  Given the enormity of their violations it is inappropriate that they would even be considered for a new C.U.P.

     I respectfully ask you to investigate this matter and to take appropriate actions that lead to a termination of the Ozena C.U.P.

 Sincerely,

 Howard Smith

 

 

  “Stop the Trucks”
c/o Ojai Chamber of Commerce
P.O. Box 1134
Ojai, CA 93024
February 1, 2008

Kim Rodriguez, Planning Director
Pat Richard, Acting Director
County of Ventura
Planning Division
800 South Victoria Ave,
Ventura, CA 93009

Dear Kim Rodriguez & Pat Richards:  

     Please consider this letter on behalf of Ojai residents, John Broesamle, Howard Smith and the “Stop the Trucks” coalition a formal request to re-open the investigation of possible C.U.P violations on August 14, 2007 in the operation of gravel trucks in conjunction with the Ozena Valley Sand and Gravel Mine.

     The Ojai “Stop the Trucks Coalition is comprised of the City of Ojai; Forestwatch; the Ojai Valley Chamber of Commerce; the Ojai Valley School District; the Ojai Valley Board of Realtors; and many hundreds of private citizens.

     In your  September 27, 2007 letter to Howard Smith (prepared by Pat Richards) and your January 8, 2008 letter to John Broesamle, the department denies both complaints of early morning and late afternoon CUP truck violations by citing the weigh tickets provided to the Planning Department by Ozena. 

     After an extensive forensic study of the weigh tickets turned over to the Planning Division by the agent for Ozena, John Hecht of West Coast Environmental & Engineering, “Stop the Trucks,” now firmly believes that the use of self-prepared weigh tickets, which appear to be the sole tool used by the division to monitor truck traffic, is not valid.  It is a method in which the results can seemingly be manipulated at will by the mine operator; and/or the weigh master; the trucking contractor; and/or their designated drivers; and may result in fraud or misrepresentation of the facts.  Clearly they fail the test as the evidentiary basis for any claims, pro or con. 

     Details of our review are in the  “Analysis” provided both below and attached separately.   Copies of the original complaints by Broesamle and Smith are also attached.

      In your letter to “Stop the Trucks” on January 17, 2008, you declared that the Planning Division will enforce Condition 72 (Days and Hours of Operation) using a strict and literal reading of the conditions and that if Ozena was in regular and routine violation of the CUP that the Division would take appropriate action against the mine, beginning with a hearing before the Planning Commission to either modify, suspend, or revoke the permit for cause.  If corrective action were not taken it is unlikely that the Planning dependent staff would recommend approval of the CUP Modification Request #2 that is currently under review by Division to the Planning Commission.

     As part of this request, “Stop the Trucks,” is asking that:

 1)  Based on this analysis and prior to any Planning Division EIR of Modification #2, there should be a thorough, open and public  investigation of whether or not Ozena has in fact complied with the existing CUP conditions. 

 2)  The review should include at a minimum 2 continuous months worth of weigh tickets and billing records for the same time period.  Preferably these tickets should be from July and August of 2007 and should specifically include the days immediately before and after the August 14th Complaints.  Although we have raised serious questions about the credibility of the weigh tickets, obtaining two months worth along with financial data such as billing records for the same time period should enable a credible analyst to determine if in fact there was true compliance.

 3)  If in fact the operators are found to be out of compliance, proceedings should be initiated to immediately suspend their current permit and deny their request for Modification #2 and the Aquaculture CUP.

 Additionally:

 4)  Given the recent death of Mike Virgilio, there should be a review by Planning Division staff and County Counsel, if needed, to assess the “Authority” of anyone who purports to represent Ozena. If testamentary documentation is found lacking, the permits should be denied.

 5)  There should be a review in conjunction with California Fish and Game to determine compliance with that agreement and again, if found lacking all permits should be terminated and/or denied.

     “Stop the Trucks” salutes you and Pat Richards as well as the entire Planning Division for being courageous enough to stand up to this assault on the CUP.

     The “Stop the Trucks” Coalition is prepared to take whatever steps are necessary, including legal action to insure that a full review as noted above occurs as soon as possible and prior to any other consideration of the Ozena permits.

 

Sincerely,

 Howard Smith,
Vice Chair
“Stop the Trucks” Coalition

cc:  Steve Bennett; Kathy Long; Peter Foy; Linda Parks; John Flynn; Marty Robinson; Jeffrey Bennett; Carole Aragon

 

THE GRAVEL TRUCK THREAT

Little Victories in a Long War


      Overview: After the gravel mines in Oxnard were played out and closed, the Cuyama Valley, which straddles both Ventura and Santa Barbara County, was identified as a potential new source. This is a permanent change and the immediate trigger for this new threat. 

     There are six mines working or in the application phase. Permits approved or pending would allow 600-800 gravel truck trips per day through Ojai on both Routes 33 to Ventura & Oxnard and 150 through downtown and the East End to Santa Paula. That is one truck every 3-5 minutes of the day, seven days a week, 24 hours a day. A new asphalt plant is going into Santa Paula that could haul all its supplies from Cuyama through Ojai on 150.

     Each double hopper truck weighs up to 80,000 pounds. According to recent Federal government reports one such truck does as much damage at 9,600 cars.  This volume of trucking through Ojai could permanently destroy our three key industries, tourism, agriculture and education, turn our town into an industrial truck road and irreparably transform the valley.

     In addition to the danger of having this many trucks on 33 & 150, carcinogenic particulate matter combined with gaseous diesel exhaust will dangerously pollute the fragile Ojai Valley air shed dramatically increasing health concerns for what is already the second worse air quality in Ventura County.

     Who Controls the Road: 

     While most cities, towns and municipalities are able to control traffic and ban vehicles with more than two axels from using their roads as byways and thoroughfares – because both Route 150 and Highway 33 are state roads, CalTrans has jurisdiction over who can travel on them and not the city of Ojai. Prior to 2001 total vehicle traffic to Cuyama over Route 33 was only 250 cars per day.

     Who Issues Permits and Monitors Compliance: 

     Trucking and gravel mine permits are issued by separately by both Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties.

     Although permits with many restrictions are put in place by the two counties, currently there is virtually no monitoring, no enforcement and virtually no penalties issued. Permits on paper have little reality with what is happening on the ground. All monitoring is left up to the public, which is almost impossible as there are currently no way to identify which mines trucks are coming from or going to. 

     What are the Alternatives: 

     Highway 166, an already-established route for heavy trucking, connects the Cuyama Valley to both the 101 Freeway to the west and the 5 Freeway to the east. Going around this way will cost gravel truck drivers no more than 45 extra minutes on the road each way. 

     What is Ojai’s Fair Share: 

     For decades Ojai has supported a small quarry in the Valley, the Mossler Rock Quarry, just north of town on 33 and we handle our fair share of trucking.

     Who Are the Members of the “Stop the Trucks Coalition”: 

     The “Stop the Trucks” coalition is composed entirely of citizen volunteers such as yourselves. The coalition and its executive board represent the Ojai Valley Chamber of Commerce; the City of Ojai; the Ojai Valley Unified School District; the Ojai Valley Board of Realtors; Los Padres Forestwatch and many other citizens and affiliated groups. We are represented by a top environmental law firm.

     What Actions has the Coalition Undertaken in the Media & Press: 

     Since January of 2007, the Ojai “Stop the Trucks” Coalition has generated over 350 letters that were sent to both the Santa Barbara & Ventura County Planning Departments. We have sent out more than 35 press releases and web page postings. We have been behind over 25 news stories that have appeared in the LA Times, the Ventura County Star, the Ojai Valley News, the Pacific Coast Business Times, the Ventura Reporter, the Santa Barbara News Press, the Santa Barbara Independent,; and the Santa Maria Times. “Stop the Trucks” also broke the news story back in March that the Ozena Mine in Ventura County is controlled by the same owner, Mike Virgilio, whose two gun stores in Compton and Oak View were recently raided and shut down by Federal ATF agents for allegedly selling guns to felons. 

     What Actions has the Coalition Undertaken about the Diamond Rock Mine: 

     Since last June with the assistance of our environmental law firm, the coalition has been negotiating with the Troesh family’s Diamond Rock mine to have them agree not to send their mine transport trucks through the Ojai Valley for many years to come.

     What About the Asphalt Plant in Santa Paula: 

     Rather than face off with the Ojai community, Granite Construction has voluntarily offered to place a ban on sending trucks through Ojai for their proposed Santa Paula asphalt plant.

     What About the Ozena Mine in Ventura County: 

     Ozena pulled out of a Mitigated Negative Declaration this spring and is now undergoing a full EIR. We have met with and filed numerous complaints with the Ventura County Planning Department regarding possible permit violations by trucks from Ozena. We have also filed for and obtained a Public Records Request to review all monitoring efforts taken by the County. This past summer the Ventura County District Attorney’s office met with the Planning Department at our request to review allegations of possible inappropriate actions by county staffers who oversaw the Ozena permit. Although no criminal behavior was found, the department subsequently changed staffing assignments for the Ozena permit.

     What About Imposing Limits on Heavy Trucking on Routes 150 and 33: 

     We have had various discussions with CalTrans officials and have obtained Public Records Request (Freedom of Information) documents from the agency which we will use as the basis for an application with the State of California to have both Routes 33 and 150 closed to all heavy trucking. We are working with the City of Ojai and doing the preliminary research needed to specifically make an application that could potentially impose some sort of weight, length, size or axle restrictions on thru trucking on both Routes 150 and 33. We view this as the only long term solution to the gravel truck crisis.

     What About Monitoring of Trucks: 

     We are working with both counties and the Ventura County Board of Supervisors to insure that adequate monitoring of all mine and trucking operations goes into place, including a requirement that three point camera monitoring of traffic and regular, monthly or quarterly audits of all truck operations take place with those cameras and records available to the public. Remember, without 1) Monitoring; 2) Enforcement; and 3) Penalties; all C.U.P. are nothing more than words on paper.

     Why are you Raising Money: 

     Members of the coalition are all volunteers who have donated their time because like you, they believe the Ojai is worth saving. Our fundraising efforts help pay mounting legal expenses in our efforts to challenge the Ozena Mine and others from trying to gain approval to send hundreds of mine transport double hopper trucks through Ojai as well as our efforts to challenge CalTrans so that the City of Ojai may end up reasserting control and jurisdiction on whether or not massive industrialization or our two major road arties can proceed. 

     How can I Help or Donate Funds: 

     The Ojai Valley Chamber of Commerce is helping the coalition collect funds. Please either call the office at 640-2524 or see our “Pledge Form” at: 


http://www.ojaipost.com/2007/05/stop_the_trucks_pledge_form.shtml


     How can I File a Complaint about Trucks that Appear to be Violating the Rules: 

     We have posted a “Catch the Trucks” complaint form at:    http://www.ojaipost.com/2007/06/catch_a_truck_violation_report.shtml

     What are the Rules:    

     Some of the mines currently have little or no restrictions imposed upon them. On weekdays Ozena is limited to sending trucks in either direction between Casitas Springs and Ojai from 6:00 am to 7:00am and from 9:00 am to 3:00 pm.


     How can I Contact “Stop the Trucks”:        You can call “Stop the Trucks” at 640-2524. Leave a message if no one is available or you can email at smythe@ojai.net and we will try to direct your query to the right person. For periodic news updates or for background information .


These answers are as accurate as we can provide as of 11/7/07, and are subject to revision.

 

Donate to Stop the Trucks              Stop the Trucks Blog